factsheet 11.8 KB
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
  <head>
    <meta name="generator" content="HTML Tidy, see www.w3.org" />
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html" />
    <title>
      SWAD-Europe: Project Fact Sheet -
      http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/factsheet/
    </title>
    <link rel="StyleSheet" type="text/css"
    href="/2001/sw/Europe/style/swad-europe.css" />
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>
      <a href="/" accesskey="W"><img src="/Icons/w3c_home"
      width="72" height="48" align="right" alt="W3C" /></a> <a
      href="http://www.cordis.lu/ist/"><img
      src="/2001/sw/Europe/images/istlogo-thumb.gif" align="right"
      alt="EU IST logo" /></a>
    </p>
    <h2 id="title" class="title">
      SWAD-Europe: Project Fact Sheet
    </h2>
    <h3>
      <a
      href="http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/">http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/</a>
    </h3>
    <p>
      <a href="http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/">SWAD-Europe</a>
      project Fact Sheet version 1.0.
    </p>
    <p>
      (based on the original <a
      href="../plan/proj_objectives.html">Project Objectives</a>
      document)
    </p>
    <!-- 
                  Editorial TODO

                  The fact sheet needs to cover a number of things, some of
                  which are addressed by project overview doc, some aren't. A
                  rough editorial checklist...

                    project rationale
                    covered?

                    objectives
                covered.

                    technical baseline
                    more detail needed? RDF, XML, Namespaces, WebOnt, rules,
                    query etc?

                    target groups
                need more?
                /2001/sw/Europe/plan/workpackages/live/esw-wp-2.html

                    application domains
                    todo (tricky, SW being so general?). emphasise 'scenario
                    led', Web...

                    intermediate / final outputs
                    final output is covered; more on intermediate, ie. what
                    people can expect to see before month 30
                                            -->
    <h4>
      Project Rationale
    </h4>
    <p>
      For the Web to reach its full potential, it must evolve into
      a Semantic Web, providing a universally accessible platform
      that allows data to be shared and processed by automated
      tools as well as by people. The 'Semantic Web' is a recent
      initiative of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), with the
      goal of extending the current Web to facilitate Web
      automation, universally accessible content, and the 'Web of
      Trust'.
    </p>
    <p>
      The SWAD-Europe project aims to support W3C's Semantic Web
      initiative in Europe, providing targeted research,
      demonstrations and outreach to ensure Semantic Web
      technologies move into the mainstream of networked computing.
      The project aims to support the development and deployment of
      W3C Semantic Web specifications through implementation,
      research and testing activities. Semantic Web Advanced
      Development for Europe (SWAD-Europe) aims to play a key role
      in the evolution of the Semantic Web, through education and
      outreach to developers, organisations and content creators;
      through Open Source implementation and testing, and through
      pre-consensus technology development to drive and inform the
      creation of new Semantic Web standards.
    </p>
    <p>
      The period 2002-2004 will see the first wave of mainstream
      Semantic Web applications. SWAD-Europe's role will be to
      ensure that the critical technology components required for
      widespread Semantic Web adoption are readily accessible to
      European industry, consumers, and developers. This involves
      finding and maintaining a balance between "in-house" Open
      Source tool development, community building, outreach and
      evangelism, combined with more technologically advanced
      research and analysis to support and field-test Semantic Web
      standards.
    </p>
    <h4>
      Objectives
    </h4>
    <ul>
      <li>
        Implement scenario-led examples showing the integration of
        multiple Semantic Web technologies drawing practical use
        cases from industry, consumer, developer perspectives.
      </li>
      <li>
        Develop a Semantic Web technology integration strategy that
        emphasises the utility of XML languages (such as SVG, HTML,
        MathML, XLink) as complementary rather than competing
        components of the Web.
      </li>
      <li>
        Ensure that the European developers, citizens and content
        creators are kept aware of Semantic Web technology for
        supporting universal accessibility, device independence and
        internationalisation.
      </li>
      <li>
        Ensure that European Community is kept aware of
        international best practice, and that best practice within
        Europe is recognised internationally.
      </li>
      <li>
        Undertake targeted research and development in support of
        these objectives, and in collaboration with the wider
        European developer community, W3C Member organisations, and
        related Open Source initiatives.
      </li>
    </ul>
    <h4>
      Expected Results
    </h4>
    <p>
      Following a 30 month schedule, by completion the project will
      have:
    </p>
    <ul>
      <li>
        Delivered a series of research demonstrations showcasing
        Semantic Web technology for consumer and industrial
        applications
      </li>
      <li>
        Created a methodology demonstrating the integration of RDF
        and Semantic Web tools with a range of XML and Web
        standards
      </li>
      <li>
        Facilitated significant technology maturation, aiding the
        deployment of Semantic Web-enhanced Web Services
      </li>
      <li>
        Deployed an Education and Outreach programme stimulating
        and disseminating technical developments within the
        European Semantic Web community
      </li>
    </ul>
    <h4>
      Application Domains: A Scenario-led Perspective
    </h4>
    <p>
      RDF, XML, Ontologies and other Semantic Web languages provide
      cross-domain technology to support the exchange and
      exploitation of structured data using the Web. The project
      will draw upon worked scenarios from a number of domains to
      illustrate the use of these standards in the Web, with
      particular emphasis on scenarios that integrate information
      from several domains, technologies and topics.
    </p>
    <p>
      The objectives of the project can best be understood in terms
      of the kinds of user scenarios that will inform the project
      throughout its lifecycle. As longstanding participants in the
      Semantic Web, XML and Web developer communities, the project
      team are familiar with a number of 'frequently asked
      questions' that arise when considering Semantic Web
      technology. These come from technical, consumer, content
      creator and business perspectives, but a common theme recurs:
      technology integration.
    </p>
    <p>
      <em>Which standard should I use?"</em>
    </p>
    <p>
      <em>"How do use RDF with XML Schemas? "</em>
    </p>
    <p>
      <em>"...or Web Services with Web Ontologies? ...MathML with
      RDF-rules?"</em>
    </p>
    <p>
      Such questions are often themselves a means to an end. The
      goal is typically not to integrate two different W3C data
      formats, but to complete some more specific task.
      Technology-oriented questions often mask an
      application-oriented need.
    </p>
    <p>
      We often hear questions such as:
    </p>
    <p>
      <em>"I am re-engineering our Intranet and want a
      standards-based way of exchanging (amongst other things)
      'organisational chart' information about departments and
      groups. The XML Schema Specification seems relevant, since we
      keep much of this data in relational databases, and tools
      exist to export data using XML Schema. Everybody recommends
      the use of XML, but there seem to be so many different ways
      of using it. The XML specification provides DTDs; there is
      also now an XML Namespaces specification, and a number of
      alternative XML Schema languages."</em>
    </p>
    <p>
      <em>"Added to this, articles I read about the Semantic Web
      suggest I should be using an `Ontology language' (instead?),
      based on RDF Schema and(/or) DAML+OIL. Since the information
      we are trying to represent is an organisational chart, we are
      also considering the use of Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) to
      create, exchange and edit this information. It is not clear
      which, if any, of these technologies are most appropriate to
      use, nor what the relationship between them is."</em>
    </p>
    <p>
      While exaggerated here for effect, these concerns are real,
      current and addressable. To answer this, we need a
      combination of advanced technology development and a
      programme of documentation, demonstration, education and
      outreach.
    </p>
    <h4>
      Target Groups
    </h4>
    <p>
      From the concerns of managers and technologists, content
      creators and policy makers, we note this same need. Web
      technology, and now Semantic Web technology in particular,
      presents a daunting array of tools, specifications and
      techniques. The full range of relevant technology, while in
      principle extremely powerful, also risks stifling or delaying
      innovation through providing too much to choose from.
    </p>
    <p>
      The overarching aim of the project is thus to provide,
      through all appropriate means, a body of answers to questions
      that have to date gone unanswered, and to foster grassroots
      communities within which such concerns are addressed. This
      approach informs the project management and overall direction
      of SWAD-Europe, as well as the content of each workpackage.
      It is more important to offer clear answers to these
      questions than it is for us to write software or complex
      technical reports. Our technical research and advanced
      development activities are a means to an end: facilitating
      wide-scale Semantic Web deployment. The project will
      therefore remain responsive to external developments (such as
      the appearance of unanticipated third-party work, software
      libraries etc.), refining the technical focus of the research
      to track the current state of the art, and to respond to the
      concerns of stakeholder communities.
    </p>
    <h4>
      Project Partners
    </h4>
    <ul>
      <li>
        INRIA (<a href="http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/">W3C</a>), <a
        href="http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/">http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/</a>
      </li>
      <li>
        University of Bristol (<a
        href="http://ilrt.org/discovery/">ILRT</a>), <a
        href="http://ilrt.org/discovery/">http://ilrt.org/discovery/</a>
      </li>
      <li>
        <a href="http://www.hpl.hp.com/semweb/">HP Labs</a>, <a
        href="http://www.hpl.hp.com/semweb/">http://www.hpl.hp.com/semweb/</a>
      </li>
      <li>
        CCLRC (<a href="http://www.bitd.clrc.ac.uk/">RAL BITD</a>),
        <a
        href="http://www.bitd.clrc.ac.uk/">http://www.bitd.clrc.ac.uk/</a>
      </li>
      <li>
        <a href="http://www.stilo.com/">Stilo</a>, <a
        href="http://www.stilo.com/">http://www.stilo.com/</a>
      </li>
    </ul>
    <hr />
    <p>
      Maintained by: <a href="http://www.w3.org/People/DanBri/">Dan
      Brickley</a> (<a href="http://www.w3.org/">W3C</a>/<a
      href="http://ilrt.org/discovery/">ILRT</a>)
    </p>
  </body>
</html>