fixing-html-with-html5.html
21 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<style type="text/css" media="all">
@import "/QA/2006/01/blogstyle.css";
</style>
<meta name="keywords" content='conformance, html, html5, quality, specification' />
<meta name="description" content="Is there a way to improve the HTML ecosystem in a way that creates more adoption of HTML 5? From parsing to serialization to fixing, how do we recover broken Web documents?" />
<meta name="revision" content="$Id: fixing-html-with-html5.html,v 1.52 2011/12/16 03:03:02 gerald Exp $" />
<link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml" title="Atom" href="http://www.w3.org/QA/atom.xml" />
<link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="RSS 1.0" href="http://www.w3.org/QA/news.rss" />
<title>HTML 5 And The Hear-Write Web - W3C Blog</title>
<link rel="start" href="http://www.w3.org/QA/" title="Home" />
<link rel="prev" href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/09/slideshow-must-go-on.html" title="The Slideshow Must Go On" />
<link rel="next" href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/10/understanding-http-put.html" title="Understanding HTTP PUT" />
<!--
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<rdf:Description
rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/09/fixing-html-with-html5.html"
trackback:ping="http://www.w3.org/QA/sununga/mt-tb.cgi/223"
dc:title="HTML 5 And The Hear-Write Web"
dc:identifier="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/09/fixing-html-with-html5.html"
dc:subject="HTML"
dc:description="Is there a way to improve the HTML ecosystem in a way that creates more adoption of HTML 5? From parsing to serialization to fixing, how do we recover broken Web documents?"
dc:creator="Karl Dubost"
dc:date="2008-09-26T06:44:29+00:00" />
</rdf:RDF>
-->
<!-- <script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.w3.org/QA/mt.js"></script>-->
</head>
<body class="layout-one-column">
<div id="banner">
<h1 id="title">
<a href="http://www.w3.org/"><img height="48" alt="W3C" id="logo" src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/WWW/w3c_home_nb" /></a>
W3C Blog
</h1>
</div>
<ul class="navbar" id="menu">
<li><strong><a href="/QA/" title="W3C Blog Home">[ W3C Blog ]</a></strong></li>
<li><a href="/QA/Library/" title="Documents and Publications on Web and Quality">Documents</a></li>
<li><a href="/QA/Tools/" accesskey="3" title="Validators and other Tools">Tools</a></li>
<li><a href="/2007/12/qa-blog-help/index#feedback">Feedback</a></li>
</ul>
<div id="searchbox">
<form method="get" action="http://www.google.com/custom" enctype="application/x-www-form-urlencoded">
<p id="formbox"><input type="text" size="15" class="textfield" name="q" accesskey="E" maxlength="255" /> <input type="submit" class="submitfield" value="Search" id="goButton" name="sa" accesskey="G" /> <input type="hidden" name="cof" value="T:black;LW:72;ALC:#ff3300;L:http://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_home;LC:#000099;LH:48;BGC:white;AH:left;VLC:#660066;GL:0;AWFID:0b9847e42caf283e;" /><input type="hidden" id="searchW3C" name="sitesearch" checked="checked" value="www.w3.org/QA" /><input type="hidden" name="domains" value="www.w3.org/QA" /></p>
</form>
</div>
<div id="main"><!-- This DIV encapsulates everything in this page - necessary for the positioning -->
<p class="content-nav">
<a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/09/slideshow-must-go-on.html">« The Slideshow Must Go On</a> |
<a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/">Main</a>
| <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/10/understanding-http-put.html">Understanding HTTP PUT »</a>
</p>
<h2 class="entry-header">HTML 5 And The Hear-Write Web</h2>
<div class="entry-body">
<p>HTML 5 working draft defines a parsing algorithm which is robust enough that it will not break for the most common types of errors. Many computing engineers and Web designers think that this feature encourages bad quality for documents. Point taken. But let's look a bit further at what proposes HTML 5 in terms of input and output.</p>
<p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/victoriapeckham/266268495/"><img style="margin:1em;float:left;" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/83/266268495_209a6bfbbb_m.jpg" alt="How do we understand typos. "/></a> I do mistakes very often. English is not my mother tongue. I try to fix spelling mistakes as much as possible. Still, my English grammar is still behind. Oh, not looking for any excuses, I do mistakes in French too. But I'm glad that our brains have a very robust parsing mechanism which helps us to recover from broken sentences (bad spelling and clumsy grammar). Just imagine for the experiment, that your brain was not able to parse any sentences that would not be grammatically correct. How many sentences in our daily conversation are 100% correct? Not that much. </p>
<p>At W3C, we take meetings minutes (a lot) of discussions happening over a phone. During these teleconferences, there are people from different nationalities, different accents, different levels of English and on top of that in different time zones (fatigue). Still the scribe (minute taker) writes down, most of the time, correct English sentences after parsing them. The scribe creates a serialization of what he heard, but modifies it to be correct.</p>
<p>An HTML 5 Tidy library could do the same thing. It could parse a broken document and create a DOM following the <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/parsing.html#parsing" title="HTML 5">HTML 5 parsing algorithm</a>. Then it could serialize it (writes it down) following the <strong>HTML 5 content model</strong>. That would create a conformant HTML 5 document.</p>
<p>This is an important part of the process. <strong>What you hear is not what you write</strong>. You are stricter, once you have recovered the meaning. The same way what the HTML 5 Tidy library has parsed is not what it will serialize. Let's take a practical example with the infamous <code>center</code> element.</p>
<pre><code><!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<title>a broken document</title>
<center><p>I want to be in the center of the page.</p></center>
</html>
</code></pre>
<p>The innerHTML view (using <a href="http://livedom.validator.nu/" title="HTML5 Live DOM Viewer">HTML 5 Live DOM viewer</a>) is:</p>
<pre><code><!DOCTYPE HTML>
<html>
<head>
<title>a broken document</title>
</head>
<body>
<center><p>I want to be in the center of the page.</p></center>
</body>
</html>
</code></pre>
<p>But the document will be invalid and the message given by the <a href="http://qa-dev.w3.org/wmvs/HEAD/" title="The W3C Markup Validation Service">experimental HTML 5 validator instance</a> will be</p>
<pre><code>Validation Output: 1 Error
# Error Line 4, Column 7: The center element is obsolete..
</code></pre>
<p>Why? Because nowhere in the content model of HTML 5, the center element is defined. You can't write an HTML 5 conformant document containing the <code>center</code> element. An HTML 5 Tidy library would emit only elements which are compatible with the HTML 5 content model. In this case that could be</p>
<pre><code><!DOCTYPE HTML>
<html>
<head>
<title>a broken document</title>
</head>
<body>
<p>I want to be in the center of the page.</p>
</body>
</html>
</code></pre>
<p>Some people will argue that everyone will want different rules. Indeed that is possible. Some will want to have double quotes around attributes, some single quotes. And if we take into account the set of documents which have complex mixed markup, it will indeed create a lot of headaches. But it's why I think it would be interesting to define a set of basic rules for emitting HTML 5 after it has been parsed.</p>
<p>Some might propose solutions of the following type for the <code>center</code> element. </p>
<pre><code><!DOCTYPE HTML>
<html>
<head>
<title>a broken document</title>
</head>
<body>
<p style="text-align:center;">
I want to be in the center of the page.
</p>
</body>
</html>
</code></pre>
<p>Daniel Glazman <a href="http://www.glazman.org/weblog/dotclear/index.php?post/2008/09/25/HTML-attributes-inline-styles-or-style-rules" title="HTML attributes, inline styles or style rules - <Glazblog/>">proposed recently</a> something quite similar for HTML attributes, inline style or style rules.</p>
<p>Are there any engineers which would be ready to take the challenges of designing an HTML 5 Tidy Library (and the canonic rules to fix the output) using the content model of HTML 5? I <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/09/top-500-html5-validity.html" title="Alexa Global Top 500 against HTML 5 validation - W3C Q&A Weblog">showed</a> recently that there will be <strong>less</strong> document validating with the HTML 5 doctype than with their current doctype. Henri Sivonen <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/09/top-500-html5-validity.html#c166027" title="Henri's comment on QA blog">rightly commented</a> that HTML 5 content model was stricter than previous versions of HTML. This will not leverage the adoption of conformant HTML 5. </p>
<p>An HTML 5 Tidy Library (even not perfect) would help people to move forward. If there are no benefits, people will continue to use HTML 4.01 and/or XHTML 1.0 because, in the end it doesn't matter, </p>
<ul>
<li>it will still be parsed correctly by browsers. </li>
<li>Authors can use the existing XHTML books out there, rely on their years of experience of the language and business practices, </li>
<li>and, last but not least, they will benefit of the tools which fix their invalid content.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div id="more" class="entry-more">
</div>
<p class="postinfo">Filed by <a href="http://www.w3.org/People/karl/">Karl Dubost</a> on September 26, 2008 6:44 AM in <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/archive/technology/html/">HTML</a>, <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/archive/web_spotting/opinions_editorial/">Opinions &amp; Editorial</a>, <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/archive/w3cqa_news/technology_101/">Technology 101</a>, <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/archive/w3cqa_news/tools/">Tools</a><br />
<span class="separator">|</span> <a class="permalink" href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/09/fixing-html-with-html5.html">Permalink</a>
| <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/09/fixing-html-with-html5.html#comments">Comments (10)</a>
| <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/09/fixing-html-with-html5.html#trackback">TrackBacks (0)</a>
</p>
<h3 class="comments-header" id="comments">Comments</h3>
<div class="comment" id="comment-166061">
<p class="comment-meta" id="c166061">
<span class="comment-meta-author"><strong>estelle </strong></span>
<span class="comment-meta-date"><a href="#c166061">#</a> 2008-09-26</span>
</p>
<div class="comment-bulk">
<p>in the case of redefining the CENTER element to be an inline style, the question arises as to the cascade. My suggestion for such an example would be </p>
<pre><!DOCTYPE HTML>
<html>
<head>
<title>a broken document</title>
</head>
<body>
<div style="text-align:center;">
<p>I want to be in the center of the page.</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
</pre>
<p>Suggestion: convert deprecated inline elements, such as FONT, to SPANs, and block level elements, such as CENTER, to DIVs. </p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="comment" id="comment-166073">
<p class="comment-meta" id="c166073">
<span class="comment-meta-author"><strong>S </strong></span>
<span class="comment-meta-date"><a href="#c166073">#</a> 2008-09-28</span>
</p>
<div class="comment-bulk">
<p>Couldn't you just write:</p>
<pre><!DOCTYPE HTML>
<html>
<head>
<title>a broken document</title>
</head>
<body>
<p align="center">
I want to be in the center of the page.
</p>
</body>
</html>
</pre>
<p>Or is that obsolete too?</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="comment" id="comment-166305">
<p class="comment-meta" id="c166305">
<span class="comment-meta-author"><strong>Blair </strong></span>
<span class="comment-meta-date"><a href="#c166305">#</a> 2008-10-03</span>
</p>
<div class="comment-bulk">
<p>The align attribute is deprecated in HTML 4.01. Most modern HTML viewers do recognize it and will render your example as intended (and will doubtless continue to do so for the foreseeable future).</p>
<p>But with the movement to use HTML for structure and CSS to control the actual presentation, creating a style attribute is preferable.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="comment" id="comment-167009">
<p class="comment-meta" id="c167009">
<span class="comment-meta-author"><strong>salzi </strong></span>
<span class="comment-meta-date"><a href="#c167009">#</a> 2008-10-17</span>
</p>
<div class="comment-bulk">
<p>I would love to get this back:</p>
<pre><!DOCTYPE HTML>
<html>
<head>
<title>a broken document</title>
</head>
<body>
<p>I want to be in the center of the page.</p>
</body>
</html>
</pre>
<p>In my point of view, that is the only clean way. As you said before, everyone will want different rules. The discussion about convert deprecated element and so on, will never end.</p>
<p>With this solution, you would get HTML 5 Code, nothing more, nothing less. If the reslut doesn't fit you expectances, you can find out what is missing and find a solution for it (i.e. using stlye="" attributes)</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="comment" id="comment-167897">
<p class="comment-meta" id="c167897">
<span class="comment-meta-author"><strong>Lee Goddard </strong></span>
<span class="comment-meta-date"><a href="#c167897">#</a> 2008-10-27</span>
</p>
<div class="comment-bulk">
<p>To avoid losing potentially-significant mark-up, I would appreciate an option to allow inline elements such as 'font' to become spans, perhaps with a class attribute of 'font.' Equally, block-level elements might become divs.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="comment" id="comment-168564">
<p class="comment-meta" id="c168564">
<span class="comment-meta-author"><strong>David </strong></span>
<span class="comment-meta-date"><a href="#c168564">#</a> 2008-11-12</span>
</p>
<div class="comment-bulk">
<p>I would prefer to get the clean html 5 markup back with no presentation (styles, or otherwise) in it at all. If important markup will be removed I can always copy the old markup before running tidy.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="comment" id="comment-168580">
<p class="comment-meta" id="c168580">
<span class="comment-meta-author"><strong>Karl Dubost <a class="commenter-profile" href="http://www.w3.org/People/karl/"><img alt="Author Profile Page" src="http://www.w3.org/QA/sununga/mt-static/images/comment/mt_logo.png" width="16" height="16" /></a></strong></span>
<span class="comment-meta-date"><a href="#c168580">#</a> 2008-11-13</span>
</p>
<div class="comment-bulk">
<p>I can see the benefits of translating the style information or to just get the clean markup. I guess for some people, the step for fixing their code without the style information will be too high. For example, if you remove all center and do not replace them by anything, the layout will be destroyed and they will feel that the Web standards are inferior to their own choices.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="comment" id="comment-169134">
<p class="comment-meta" id="c169134">
<span class="comment-meta-author"><strong>steven christopher </strong></span>
<span class="comment-meta-date"><a href="#c169134">#</a> 2008-11-22</span>
</p>
<div class="comment-bulk">
<p>i would prefer the font's to become family font src="......./...../ etc
the "pre" tags to become "fixed"(fxd) body background to become = "bbgsrc="color" or "img".html etc
do away with the <div> tags and just use <br />
also it's about time we do away with all the old html and stick to 3.2 and upwards. out with old ! in with the new !</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="comment" id="comment-181782">
<p class="comment-meta" id="c181782">
<span class="comment-meta-author"><strong>Larry Masinter </strong></span>
<span class="comment-meta-date"><a href="#c181782">#</a> 2009-05-19</span>
</p>
<div class="comment-bulk">
<p>It makes more sense to specify first what writers should write, and then secondly give advice about what hearers are expected to understand to be compatible with what is currently written. </p>
<p>The current HTML5 specification intentionally doesn't do that: it defines how hearers are supposed to listen, and, as an afterthought, gives some restrictions as to what should be written.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="comment" id="comment-182392">
<p class="comment-meta" id="c182392">
<span class="comment-meta-author"><strong>Izek </strong></span>
<span class="comment-meta-date"><a href="#c182392">#</a> 2009-06-16</span>
</p>
<div class="comment-bulk">
<p>DIVs don't like to center block level content just so you know (Such as other DIVs.) Text-align:center won't always work.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="comments-open" id="comments-open">
<h3 class="comments-open-header">Leave a comment</h3>
<div class="comments-open-moderated">
<p>
Note: this blog is intended to foster <strong>polite
on-topic discussions</strong>. Comments failing these
requirements and spam will not get published. Please,
enter your real name and email address. Every
individual comment is reviewed by the W3C staff.
This may take some time, thank you for your patience.
</p>
<p>
You can use the following HTML markup (a href, b, i,
br/, p, strong, em, ul, ol, li, blockquote, pre)
and/or <a href="http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax">Markdown syntax</a>.</p>
</div>
<div id="comments-open-data">
<form method="post" action="http://www.w3.org/QA/sununga/beach.pl" id="comments-form">
<h4>Your comment</h4>
<div id="comments-open-text">
<textarea id="comment-text" name="text" rows="20" cols="100"></textarea><br />
<label for="comment-text">Write your comment text here. Remember, keep the discussion on topic and courteous.</label>
</div>
<h4>About you</h4>
<div id="comment-form-name">
<input type="hidden" name="static" value="1" />
<input type="hidden" name="entry_id" value="233" />
<input type="hidden" name="__lang" value="en" />
<label for="comment-author">Your Name</label>
<input id="comment-author" name="author" size="30" value="" />
</div>
<div id="comment-form-email">
<label for="comment-email">Your Email Address</label>
<input id="comment-email" name="email" size="30" value="" />
</div>
<div id="comments-open-footer">
<input type="submit" accesskey="s" name="post" id="comment-submit" value="Submit" />
</div>
</form>
</div>
</div>
<p id="gentime">This page was last generated on $Date: 2011/12/16 03:03:02 $</p>
</div><!-- End of "main" DIV. -->
<address>
This blog is written by W3C staff and working group participants,<br />
and maintained by <a href="/People/CMercier/">Coralie Mercier</a>.<br />
Authorized parties may <a href="/QA/new">log in</a> to create a new entry.<br/>
<span id="poweredby">Powered by Movable Type, magpierss and a lot of Web Technology</span>
</address>
<p class="copyright">
<a rel="Copyright" href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Copyright">Copyright</a> © 1994-2011
<a href="http://www.w3.org/"><acronym title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C</acronym></a>®
(<a href="http://www.csail.mit.edu/"><acronym title="Massachusetts Institute of Technology">MIT</acronym></a>,
<a href="http://www.ercim.eu/"><acronym title="European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics">ERCIM</acronym></a>,
<a href="http://www.keio.ac.jp/">Keio</a>),
All Rights Reserved.
W3C <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Legal_Disclaimer">liability</a>,
<a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#W3C_Trademarks">trademark</a>,
<a rel="Copyright" href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-documents">document use</a>
and <a rel="Copyright" href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software">software licensing</a>
rules apply. Your interactions with this site are in accordance
with our <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/privacy-statement#Public">public</a> and
<a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/privacy-statement#Members">Member</a> privacy
statements.
</p>
</body>
</html>