RDFCoreWGCharter 13.2 KB
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
  <head>
    <meta name="generator"
    content="HTML Tidy for Linux/x86 (vers 1st March 2002), see www.w3.org" />
    <title>
      W3C Semantic Web: RDF Core Working Group Charter
    </title>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
    content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
    <link href="/StyleSheets/base.css" rel="stylesheet"
    type="text/css" />
    <link href="charter.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
    <p>
      <a href="http://www.w3.org/"><img border="0"
      src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/WWW/w3c_home" alt="W3C" /></a>
    </p>
    <h1>
      W3C RDF Core Working Group Charter
    </h1>
    <blockquote> <em>Per section <a
    href="http://www.w3.org/2003/06/Process-20030618/groups.html#GAGeneral">6
    Working Groups, Interest Groups, and Coordination Groups</a> of
    the W3C Process, this charter, and any changes to it, take effect
    by way of an announcement to the W3C Membership via <a
    href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/">w3c-ac-members</a>.</em></blockquote>

    <h2>
      1. Purpose and Scope
    </h2>
    <p>
      This is the charter for an <a href="RDFCore/">RDF Core Working
      Group</a>, managed under the <a href="/2001/sw/">W3C Semantic Web
      Activity</a>. Implementor feedback concerning the RDF <a
      href="http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/">Model
      and Syntax Recommendation</a> points to the need for a number of
      fixes, clarifications and improvements to the specification of
      RDF's abstract model and XML syntax. There is also considerable
      interest in the exploration of alternative XML serialization
      mechanisms for RDF data. The role of the RDF Core WG is to
      prepare the way for such work by stabilizing the core RDF
      specifications. The RDF Core WG is neither chartered to develop a
      new RDF syntax, nor to reformulate the RDF model. However, the
      group is expected to re-articulate the RDF model and syntax
      specification in such a way as to better facilitate future work
      on alternative XML encodings for RDF.
    </p>
    <p>
      The RDF Core WG is chartered to complete the work on RDF
      vocabulary description present in the <a
      href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000327/">RDF
      Schema Candidate Recommendation</a>. The Working Group will
      address questions and issues raised on the public comments
      feedback list and the RDF Interest Group list during the
      Candidate Recommendation period and will produce an updated W3C
      specification. The specific type of Technical Report to publish;
      whether Working Draft, updated Candidate Recommendation, or
      Proposed Recommendation will be decided by consensus of the
      Working Group according to the number and nature of any changes
      that are made to the previous version.
    </p>
    <p>
      Following the <a
      href="http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/NOTE-schema-arch-19991007">Cambridge
      Communique</a> meeting, feedback received on the RDF Schema
      Candidate Recommendation, and ongoing discussions in the XML and
      RDF developer community, the RDF Core WG must provide an account
      of the relationships between the basic components of RDF (Model,
      Syntax, Schema) and the larger XML family of recommendations.
    </p>
    <h2>
      2. Requirements
    </h2>
    <p>
      RDF provides a common framework for representing metadata across
      many applications. The semantics and structure of many varieties
      of metadata will be specified by independent communities. RDF
      provides an infrastructure that is sufficiently general and
      flexible to support these disparate applications.
    </p>
    <p>
      In order to support interoperability across these disparate
      applications, a clarification and re-articulation of the core RDF
      specifications is required. The RDF Core WG must address the
      issues raised on www-rdf-comments against the RDF Schema 1.0
      Candidate Recommendation and the RDF Model and Syntax
      Recommendation.
    </p>
    <h3>
      Deployment Considerations
    </h3>
    <p>
      Backwards compatibility with existing RDF applications is a
      priority for the RDF Core Working Group. Since the web is in
      continuous operation, it is the responsibility of this working
      group to ensure graceful deployment of corrections to the RDF
      specifications by carefully considering both the impact of new
      RDF documents on extant software, and the impact of revised
      software on extant documents.
    </p>
    <p>
      At the same time, since the web is growing rapidly, it is the
      responsibility of this group to not let near-term deployment
      considerations grossly increase the future costs (to
      implementors, authors, users, etc.) of new features.
    </p>
    <h3>
      RDF Model and Syntax Requirements
    </h3>
    <p>
      The RDF Core WG must address the issues listed in the <a
      href="http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/">RDF Issue
      Tracking</a> document, liaising (via the Semantic Web
      Coordination Group) with other W3C groups where issues need to be
      addressed at a cross-WG level.
    </p>
    <p>
      The RDF Core group must take into account the various
      formalizations of RDF that have been proposed since the
      publication of the RDF Model and Syntax Recommendation. The group
      is encouraged to make use both of formal techniques and
      implementation-led test cases throughout their work.
    </p>
    <h3>
      RDF Schema Requirements
    </h3>
    <p>
      The goal of RDF Schema is to support an incrementally extensible
      approach to representing semantics in machine understandable form
      and to provide a simple base that can be extended by more
      powerful representational systems. The RDF schema system must
      provide an extensibility mechanism to allow future work (for
      example on Web Ontology and logic-based Rule languages) to
      provide richer facilities.
    </p>
    <p>
      RDF Schema must be expressed in terms of the RDF model, and must
      use W3C RDF syntax. RDF Schema must use and build upon XML Schema
      datatypes to the fullest extent that is practical and
      appropriate. Specifically, the RDF Core Working Group is not
      chartered to develop a separate data typing language that
      duplicates facilities provided by XML Schema data types.
    </p>
    <h2>
      3. Relationships and Dependencies
    </h2>
    <p>
      Coordination with other groups will be managed through the <a
      href="http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/CGcharter">Semantic Web
      Coordination Group</a>.
    </p>
    <p>
      The Topic Maps community have produced an XML-based Topic Map
      serialization syntax (XTM), and the W3C XML Protocol Working
      Group is already chartered to produce a similar mechanism. The
      XML Protocol Working Group Charter lists as a goal the creation
      of a <a
      href="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/XML-Protocol-Charter#representation">
      "mechanism for serializing data representing non-syntactic data
      models such as object graphs and directed labeled graphs, based
      on the datatypes of XML Schema"</a>. The RDF Core WG will need to
      liaise with the XML Protocol Working Group and XTM communities to
      ensure that the RDF Core specifications are produced with
      consideration for possible future work on alternate RDF syntaxes.
    </p>
    <h2>
      4. Deliverables
    </h2>
    <p>
      The RDF Core WG is expected to begin work upon announcement of
      the Semantic Web Activity, and to meet face to face between two
      and four times prior to completion of their work in <span class="mod">mid  2004</span>.
    </p>
    <h3>
      Deliverables
    </h3>
    <p>
      The deliverables of RDF Core WG are as follows.
    </p>
    <ul>
      <li>
        update and maintain the RDF <strong>Issue Tracking</strong>
        document
      </li>
      <li>
        publish a set of machine-processable <strong>test
        cases</strong> corresponding to technical issues addressed by
        the WG
      </li>
      <li>
        provide an update of the <strong>errata and status
        pages</strong> for the RDF specifications
      </li>
      <li>
        update the RDF <strong>Model and Syntax Specification</strong>
        (as one, two or more documents) clarifying the model and fixing
        issues with syntax
      </li>
      <li>
        complete work on <strong>RDF Schema</strong> 1.0 Specification
      </li>
      <li>
        provide an account of the <strong>relationship between RDF and
        the XML family of technologies</strong> (particularly Schemas
        and Infoset/Query)
      </li>
    </ul>
    <h3>
      Schedule
    </h3>
    <div class="mod">
      <p>
        The following schedule is planned. Revisions of this schedule
        must be agreed through the Semantic Web <a
        href="CGcharter">Coordination Group</a>.
      </p>
      <ul>
        <li>
          Last Call : Jan 2003
        </li>
        <li>
          Proposed Recommendations: June 2003
        </li>
        <li>
          Recommendation : 10 Feb 2004
        </li>
        <li>
          Errata / Wrap-up : Feb 2004 - May 2004
        </li>
      </ul>
      <p>
        The group is expected to close down in mid 2004.
      </p>
    </div>
    <h2>
      5. Meetings and WG Membership
    </h2>
    <p>
      The Working Group will conduct its primary discussion via
      electronic mail. The mail archive will be publicly readable,
      however posting to the mailing list will be restricted to Working
      Group participants. Public input should be via the <a
      href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/">www-rdf-comments</a>
      list, to which this Working Group will be expected to read and
      respond.
    </p>
    <p>
      Working Group members will need to be familiar with the RDF Model
      and Syntax Specification, RDF Schema 1.0 Specification, and other
      related XML specifications (particularly XML Schema), and will
      ideally have implementation experience with RDF-based
      applications.
    </p>
    <p>
      Teleconferences and face to face meetings will be scheduled as
      necessary to facilitate the work. Two to four face to face
      meetings are anticipated. Participants will be expected to
      typically devote a minimum of twelve hours per week, exclusive of
      face-to-face meetings, to this working group. Maintaining
      communication with the wider RDF developer community through <a
      href="/RDF/Interest/">RDF Interest Group</a> channels (<a
      href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/">www-rdf-interest</a>,
      <a
      href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/">www-rdf-logic</a>,
      <a href="http://www.w3.org/RDF/Interest/#irc">IRC chat</a>) will
      also be important aspects of the group's work.
    </p>
    <p>
      Participation in the Working Group is available to individuals
      nominated by their W3C Advisory Representatives. The Working
      Group chairs may grant <a
      href="/Consortium/Process/Process-19991111/organization.html#invited-expert">
      invited expert</a> status to other members of the Web community
      at their discretion.
    </p>
    <h2>
      <a id="IPR" name="IPR">6. Intellectual Property</a>
    </h2>
    <p>
      W3C promotes an open working environment. Whenever possible,
      technical decisions should be made unencumbered by intellectual
      property right (IPR) claims.
    </p>
    <p>
      This is a Royalty Free Working Group, as described in W3C's <a
      href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-patent-practice-20020124">Current
      Patent Practice</a>, dated 24 January 2002.
    </p>
    <p>
      Working Group participants disclose patent claims by sending
      email to <tt>patent-issues@w3.org</tt>; please see <a
      href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-patent-practice-20020124">Current
      Patent Practice</a> for more information about disclosures.
    </p>
    <p>
      W3C promotes an open working environment. Whenever possible,
      technical decisions should be made unencumbered by intellectual
      property right (IPR) claims. W3C's policy for intellectual
      property is set out in <a
      href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/#ipr">section 2.2 of
      the W3C Process Document</a>.
    </p>
    <h2>
      7. Contacts
    </h2>
    <p>
      The chairs of the group are <a
      href="mailto:brian_mcbride@hp.com">Brian McBride</a> (<a
      href="http://www.hpl.hp.com/">HP Labs</a>) and <a
      href="mailto:danbri@w3.org">Dan Brickley</a> (<a
      href="http://www.w3.org/">W3C</a>/<a
      href="http://ilrt.org/">ILRT</a>)
    </p>
    <p>
      The W3C staff contact is <a href="mailto:em@w3.org">Eric
      Miller</a>, Semantic Web Activity lead.
    </p>
    <hr />
    <!-- keep -->
    $Revision: 1.15 $ of $Date: 2004/02/24 22:11:23 $ by <!-- -->
    $Author: connolly $ <!-- /keep -->
  </body>
</html>