15-mediafrag-minutes.html
53.5 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html lang='en' xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">
<head>
<meta name="generator" content=
"HTML Tidy for Linux (vers 6 November 2007), see www.w3.org" />
<title>Media Fragments Working Group Teleconference -- 15 Jun
2010</title>
<link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET" href=
"http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/base.css" />
<link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET" href=
"http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/public.css" />
<link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET" href=
"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/minutes-style.css" />
<meta content="Media Fragments Working Group Teleconference"
name="Title" />
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=
"Content-Type" />
</head>
<body>
<p><a href="http://www.w3.org/"><img src=
"http://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_home" alt="W3C" border="0" height=
"48" width="72" /></a></p>
<h1>- DRAFT -</h1>
<h1>Media Fragments Working Group Teleconference</h1>
<h2>15 Jun 2010</h2>
<p><a href=
'http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/SixthF2FAgenda'>Agenda</a></p>
<p>See also: <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-irc">IRC log</a></p>
<h2><a name="attendees" id="attendees">Attendees</a></h2>
<div class="intro">
<dl>
<dt>Present</dt>
<dd>Jacob, Jack, Yves, Raphael, Erik, davy, Wim, Franck,
Silvia</dd>
<dt>Regrets</dt>
<dd>Michael</dd>
<dt>Chair</dt>
<dd>Raphael, Erik</dd>
<dt>Scribe</dt>
<dd>raphael</dd>
</dl>
</div>
<h2>Contents</h2>
<ul>
<li>
<a href="#agenda">Topics</a>
<ol>
<li><a href="#item01">1. Administrative</a></li>
<li><a href="#item02">2. Firefox plugin demo</a></li>
<li><a href="#item03">3. Media Fragments URI
syntax</a></li>
<li><a href="#item04">4. Protocol Handling</a></li>
<li><a href="#item05">5. Other dimensions (track, id,
xywh)</a></li>
<li><a href="#item06">6. Handling track and id</a></li>
<li><a href="#item07">7. Housekeeping</a></li>
</ol>
</li>
<li><a href="#ActionSummary">Summary of Action Items</a></li>
</ul>
<hr />
<div class="meeting">
<p class='phone'></p>
<p class='phone'></p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> Date: 15 June
2010</p>
<h3 id="item01">1. Administrative</h3>
<p class='irc'><<cite>scribe</cite>> scribe: raphael</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>scribe</cite>> scribenick:
raphael</p>
<p class='phone'>The agenda is at <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/SixthF2FAgenda">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/SixthF2FAgenda</a></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>scribe:</cite> agenda approved</p>
<h3 id="item02">2. Firefox plugin demo</h3>
<p class='phone'>Plugin and demos are available in the CVS
repository</p>
<p class='phone'>Jakub is presenting what the plugin can do</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>scribe:</cite> do temporal and spatial
fragments<br />
... compliant with the current spec, generate the good headers
and interact with the client media player<br />
... use of custom controls for the media player in the UA from
Davy<br />
... connect to the ninsuna proxy server</p>
<p class='phone'>Jakub showing HTTP traces</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jakub:</cite> first demo, <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/code/plugin/demos/temporal/demo_10-20.html">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/code/plugin/demos/temporal/demo_10-20.html</a><br />
... if you click elsewhere on the timeline, nothing happened
... we should fix this in the future<br />
... second demo, <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/code/plugin/demos/temporal/demo_5-15.html">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/code/plugin/demos/temporal/demo_5-15.html</a><br />
... what you get is the closest interval</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> let's keep this in mind,
since I think we should have the smallest interval, not
necesarily the closest<br />
... let's keep this open and decide later on, since we might
need more test cases</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jakub:</cite> third demo: <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/code/plugin/demos/spatial/demo_spatial1.html">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/code/plugin/demos/spatial/demo_spatial1.html</a><br />
... just an overlay on the UA player ... no request sent to the
server<br />
... problem here: the server does not send X-Content-Duration
header so no length written in the firefox timeline<br />
... fourth demo: not yet there, a combination of temporal and
spatial which nicely highlights the blackboard</p>
<p class='phone'>Jakub is using Fiddler, <a href=
"http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2/">http://www.fiddler2.com/fiddler2/</a></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>scribe:</cite> but only on Windows<br />
... you can use any HTTP proxy<br />
... slightly more reliable than a firebug which is a firefox
extension</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> good stuff!</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jakub:</cite> now showing the plugin
options<br />
... you will see the settings, where you can put a proxy
address<br />
... by default: Ninsuna<br />
... so it can works for any video (e.g. YouTube) since they are
proxying to Ninsuna<br />
... Ninsuna can process on the fly any videos encoded in
MP4<br />
... ogg will follow soon</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> some questions regarding
how the plugin works</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jakub:</cite> the plugin uses the
Firefox javascript API ... nothing standardized for setting up
the headers</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> s/?Wim/Wim/</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> who should detect stupid
request? e.g. #t=30,20<br />
... currently, the plugin is sending a request</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Silvia:</cite> I think the plugin /
browser should detect such mal-formed requests</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> Yes Silvia, as it is
written in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/TemporalDimension">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/TemporalDimension</a>,
TC03</p>
<p class='phone'>Jakub showing a very interesting example ...
from the Mozilla web site, a video of Firefox 3.6</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>scribe:</cite> where at one point, we
get a 416 answer instead of a 200!</p>
<p class='phone'>Yves pretends that the server is wrong in this
case</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> what is the
request?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> EACCcc server seems to
be misbehaving</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>jsendor</cite>> <a href=
"http://videos-cdn.mozilla.net/firefox/3.6/whatsnewin36.ogv">http://videos-cdn.mozilla.net/firefox/3.6/whatsnewin36.ogv</a></p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hackerjack</cite>> Jakub, use this
URL for the non-mf-aware webserver example: <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/media/fragf2f.ogv">http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/media/fragf2f.ogv</a></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Yves:</cite> the issue is that when
Jakub is sending a valid range but unknown by the server, the
server is sending back a 416 instead of a 200</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>jsendor</cite>> I am sending
exactly something like this: <a href=
"http://html5demos.com/assets/dizzy.ogv#t=0:00:05">http://html5demos.com/assets/dizzy.ogv#t=0:00:05</a>,0:00:20
+ proper headers</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Yves:</cite> this is not the problem of
Apache<br />
... but a problem of this server</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>erik</cite>> scribe: Raphael</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>erik</cite>> ScribeNick:
Raphael</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>erik</cite>> chair: Raphael,
Erik</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>erik</cite>> agenda: <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/SixthF2FAgenda">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/SixthF2FAgenda</a></p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>erik</cite>> Date: 15 June 2010</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> which recipes are
implemented ?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jakub:</cite> the one with
;include-setup<br />
... I'm not playing with the cache currently</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> if you click on the seeking
bar, nothing is happening, right?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jakub:</cite> yes</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> limitation of the plugin
= works in firefox, thus with theora codec (no h.264) ... will
talk about the Chrome plugin later</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> precision, if you click on
the seeking bar outside of the range the browsers knows
about</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> So only the recipe at
5.2.2 is implemented<br />
... Actually: 5.2.2.2</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jakub:</cite> I try to investigate how
to do a Chome plugin<br />
... it is much newer, so currently we can do less things<br />
... many requests from developers and Chrome is giving more and
more power to developers but currently buggy<br />
... might be difficult to have custom controls too on
Chrome<br />
... so rendering in UA will be difficult</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Davy:</cite> Chrome has already
implemented some smart media retrieval<br />
... live demo: open <a href=
"http://ninsuna.elis.ugent.be/MediaFragmentsPlayerHTML?url=http%3A//ninsuna.elis.ugent.be/DownloadServlet/apple/10%2C000_BC_trailer_2.mp4%3Ftrack%3D1%3B2%23t%3D100%2C110%26xywh%3Dpercent%3A10%2C10%2C50%2C50&ajax=1&height=375&width=1180">
http://ninsuna.elis.ugent.be/MediaFragmentsPlayerHTML?url=http%3A//ninsuna.elis.ugent.be/DownloadServlet/apple/10%2C000_BC_trailer_2.mp4%3Ftrack%3D1%3B2%23t%3D100%2C110%26xywh%3Dpercent%3A10%2C10%2C50%2C50&ajax=1&height=375&width=1180</a>
on Chrome<br />
... even though the range is at the end, it plays immediately
!<br />
... chrome behaves differently with ogg, but just for
MP4!<br />
... the ability to jump immediately to a timepoint</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> last issue, our demo is
a HTML page that contains one video, is it or use case?<br />
... what's happening if multiple videos on the page?<br />
... what's happening if the URI is not an html document but a
ogg resource?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jakub:</cite> the fragments is applied
to ALL <video> elements of the html page<br />
... for the plugin, it does not know if the video resource has
been directly requested or through a page</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> shouldn't the URI in
the video element contain the fragment rather than the html
page?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jakub:</cite> it just adds headers<br />
... the browser is requesting all elements contained in a
page</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> each resource
separately, as it should</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> I agree<br />
... what's happening when the URI in the browser bar is a media
resource</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jakub:</cite> Firefox treats this
separately, it is not a page<br />
... headers are modified, so it works<br />
... but we cannot have custom controls, so the UA cannot really
render the fragment</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> you mean: the plugin
cannot render the fragment?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> it can ... with some
tricks<br />
... removing the default controls of firefox<br />
... and use the contextual menu to enforce custom
controls<br />
... the issue Silvia is that Firefox does not consider <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/media/fragf2f.ogv">http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/media/fragf2f.ogv</a>
as a page<br />
... you need to hide the default controls and enforce yours</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> yes, I understood
that - I was wondering how you managed to get around it</p>
<p class='phone'>Room applauses Jakub</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> I applaud Jakub, too
:)</p>
<h3 id="item03">3. Media Fragments URI syntax</h3>
<p class='phone'>ACTION-152?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> ACTION-152 -- Yves
Lafon to change the formal syntax to reflect that we don't need
a subdelim for selecting multiple tracks but we allow multiple
track= in the URI + change the top level part to reflect the
latest change on the mediasegment production -- due 2010-03-16
-- OPEN</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/152">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/152</a></p>
<p class='phone'>When the action has been given: <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2010/03/09-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01">http://www.w3.org/2010/03/09-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01</a></p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#naming-track">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#naming-track</a></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Yves:</cite> OK, I need to modify the
grammar</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> the semantics is a and,
right?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> we need to look at the
prose to make sure that because of this, the media can get
'bigger', since we are collecting potentially many tracks</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> I have an
announcement</p>
<p class='phone'>ACTION-119?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> ACTION-119 -- Yves
Lafon to request admins to set up a cvs notifications mailing
list and notifications -- due 2009-10-14 -- OPEN</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/119">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/119</a></p>
<p class='phone'>The mailing list has been setup</p>
<p class='phone'>It is:
member-media-fragment-notifications@w3.org</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>scribe:</cite> you must subscribe to it
if you wish to get notifications in our repository</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> <a href=
"http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-media-fragment-notifications/">
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-media-fragment-notifications/</a></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>scribe:</cite> for example, get
notifications for all the demo files uploaded this
morning<br />
... but also chaanges in the spec<br />
... this is an opt-in mailing list, so far, only Yves and I are
subscribed</p>
<p class='phone'>close ACTION-119</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> ACTION-119 Request
admins to set up a cvs notifications mailing list and
notifications closed</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> Yves is working now on
the ACTION-152<br />
... formal grammar fixed now for the URI syntax<br />
... allow multiple 'track=' in the URI<br />
... nothing to change in the header syntax since Silvia has
already foreseen the case<br />
... i.e: track-ranges-specifier = trackprefix "=" trackparam *(
";" trackparam )</p>
<p class='phone'>close ACTION-152</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> ACTION-152 Change
the formal syntax to reflect that we don't need a subdelim for
selecting multiple tracks but we allow multiple track= in the
URI + change the top level part to reflect the latest change on
the mediasegment production closed</p>
<p class='phone'>ACTION-160?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> ACTION-160 -- Yves
Lafon to send an email reporting the issue for track names --
due 2010-04-14 -- OPEN</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/160">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/160</a></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Yves:</cite> mail has not been
sent<br />
... I will explain the issue</p>
<p class='phone'>we are seeing more and more IRIs, so what
should be the encoding of a fragment in a IRI?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>scribe:</cite> how do we specify that
track names should be encoded in UTF-8 if the IRIs is encoded
differently ?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Yves:</cite> there are mappings between
IRIs and URIs<br />
... IRIs can be a different character set</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> <a href=
"http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987.txt">http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987.txt</a></p>
<p class='phone'>Jack is giving an example mixing latin2
(Polish with /L), utf8 and Big5 (Chinese) encoding</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> I think it is not a unique
problem for us<br />
... I'm pretty sure actually<br />
... so other groups must have faced this issue</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> suggest that Yves's
action is transformed into a mail to the Internationalization
WG cc-ing us to flag the issue we have</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> <a href=
"http://tools.ietf.org/wg/idnabis/">http://tools.ietf.org/wg/idnabis/</a></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> suggest that Yves does
this action after lunch break</p>
<p class='phone'>ACTION-170?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> ACTION-170 -- Yves
Lafon to send an email about metadata headers and 206 responses
-- due 2010-06-09 -- OPEN</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/170">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/170</a></p>
<p class='phone'>See Yves's email at <a href=
"http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jun/0007.html">
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jun/0007.html</a></p>
<p class='phone'>See Silvia's understanding of the issue:
<a href=
"http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jun/0009.html">
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jun/0009.html</a></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Yves:</cite> first issue, if you have
the header data of the media file, and try to get now a
fragment of it, you need to make sure the representation of the
resouce has not changed<br />
... works with if-range and etag</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> <a href=
"http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-09#section-5.3">
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-09#section-5.3</a></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Yves:</cite> second issue, drawing on
the blackboard<br />
... request a first fragment (request 1) triggers a reply with
a Content-Range-Mapping header<br />
... request a second fragment (request 2) triggers another
reply with another Content-Range-Mapping header<br />
... the Content-Range-Mapping is an Entity Header ... so it
will be saved<br />
... that's why I think we should NOT add any new headers in the
spec<br />
... summary, IF-RANGE is an orthogonal issue ... it is just to
ensure that we have a fresh copy<br />
... headers apply to the full resource</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> I understand the issue ...
but we need paragraphs in the spec<br />
... perhaps a new section of how caches must work, similar to
section 7 for clients<br />
... drawing will put in the wiki in lunch</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> after lunch break,
continuing on ACTION-170<br />
... now, we have a drawing on the wiki<br />
... see <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/File:F2f-jun2010-cr-crm-caching.jpg">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/File:F2f-jun2010-cr-crm-caching.jpg</a><br />
... I think the discussion should now interest both Silvia and
Conrad ... we are discussing a proper use of the
Content-Range-Mapping header</p>
<p class='phone'>ACTION-170?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> ACTION-170 -- Yves
Lafon to send an email about metadata headers and 206 responses
-- due 2010-06-09 -- OPEN</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/170">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/170</a></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> further explanation ... in
the 3rd solution of the picture, the CR has just bytes ...
while the CRM has both bytes + seconds</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Conrad:</cite> your problem is you have
just one request header (Range) and several reply headers (for
handling caching)</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Yves:</cite> if you have a Vary header,
the cache will not cache anything at all</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> Req1: Get time range
0-5, reply bytes 0-2048 + crm 0-5, a nmf-aware cache will cache
this</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> req2: Get time range
5-10, reply byte 2048-4096 + crm 5-10. a nmf-aware cache will
cache it and update crm to be 5-10 only</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> req3: get byte range
0-4096, cache will reply with bytes 0-4096 with crm 5-10</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> so the client will
think that 5-10s == 0-4096 bytes which is wrong</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> the CRM header is a
solution for optimizing the case where old caches will be able
to cache media fragments expressed in seconds, but will be able
to serve it only when a subsequent request is expressed in
terms of byte ranges</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> hance the need to put
in CRM 2048-4096 = 5s-10s</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>conrad</cite>> so a UA or cache
that understands time ranges must be able to understand byte
ranges, and can effectively ignore the c-r-m response header
and just deal with byte ranges?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> is it not a corner
case?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> conrad: yes, that's
the idea</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> an UA that understands
time ranges can do what it wants</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> an UA knowing only
byte ranges won't give misleading information</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> that's the only
point</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>conrad</cite>> well, a ua that only
understands byte ranges isn't going to make the time range
request in the first place</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> Adding a Vary: Range,
on each request, the cnon-mf aware cache will clear its current
entry</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>conrad</cite>> Yves, I don't
understand what you mean by "can do what it wants"</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>conrad</cite>> obviously the only
thing to do is to accept the body and play it</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>conrad</cite>> yes, i wouldn't vary
on range on this response</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>conrad</cite>> yes, i wouldn't vary
on range on this request</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> A mf-aware UA may
ignore the byte range, and take only the range in second form
the CRM, (but receiving a 206 means that the server understood
and sent the right fragment)</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Yves:</cite> if a client has sent time
range request, and receives a 200 with a CRM because the cache
does not understand Media Fragments, then the client should not
cache the CRM that does not belong to the 200 response</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#processing-protocol-server-mapped-default">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#processing-protocol-server-mapped-default</a></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> we are discussing now
recipes described in 5.2.2.1 and 5.2.2.2<br />
... headlines are wrong, since all 5.2.2.x solutions are
cacheable in some sense</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Davy:</cite> CRM is useless in the case
of a 200 response<br />
... or if the UA makes a byte ranges request</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> we need to add a
paragraph for explaining this clearly in the spec<br />
... the rationale for the introduction of this new header</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> Next to the
introduction of new dimensions for the HTTP Range request
header, we also introduce a new HTTP response header, called
Content-Range-Mapping, which provides the mapping of the
retrieved byte range to the original Range request, which was
not in bytes. It serves two purposes:</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> • It Indicates the
actual mapped range in terms of fragment dimensions. This is
necessary since the server might not be able to provide a byte
range mapping that corresponds exactly to the requested range.
Therefore, the User Agent needs to be aware of this
variance.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> It provides context
information regarding the parent resource in case the Range
request contained a temporal dimension. More specifically, the
header contains the start and end time of the parent resource.
This way, the User Agent is able to understand and visualize
the temporal context of the media fragment.</p>
<p class='phone'><strong class='resolution'>RESOLUTION: adopt
the third solution drawn on the wiki</strong></p><a name=
"action01" id="action01"></a>
<p class='irc'><<cite>scribe</cite>>
<strong>ACTION:</strong> Yves to modify the ABNF syntax of the
Content-Range-Mapping header to take into account this
resolution [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01">http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01</a>]</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> Created ACTION-171
- Modify the ABNF syntax of the Content-Range-Mapping header to
take into account this resolution [on Yves Lafon - due
2010-06-22].</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Silvia:</cite> I support very much a
section for caches</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> I would suggest we rename
the section 7 into a "Note for Implementers"<br />
... with 7.1: For UA implementers ... how to render Media
Fragments<br />
... with 7.2: For cache implementers ... how to handle Media
Fragments</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>conrad</cite>> how about for each
example, you show how you would retrieve the first 10k of a
media fragment request, ie. the first 10k of "this video from
time 5-10min" ... then the next 10k ... then the next 10k ...
of that</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>conrad</cite>> if you can do that,
it's probably usefully cacheable, and streamable</p><a name=
"action02" id="action02"></a>
<p class='irc'><<cite>scribe</cite>>
<strong>ACTION:</strong> Jack to work on the existing Section
7, and draft 7.2 [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html#action02">http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html#action02</a>]</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> Created ACTION-172
- Work on the existing Section 7, and draft 7.2 [on Jack Jansen
- due 2010-06-22].</p>
<p class='phone'>close ACTION-170</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> ACTION-170 Send an
email about metadata headers and 206 responses closed</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> to conrad, bytes range are
absolute with respect to the original resource, so no
cascading</p>
<h3 id="item04">4. Protocol Handling</h3>
<p class='phone'><cite>Wim:</cite> issue for non multiplexed
file ... the video is in the beginning and the audio starts in
the middle<br />
... the time ranges correspond to multiple byte ranges<br />
... how this should be represented in the CRM header?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Erik:</cite> Wim, can you write an
example on IRC?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> Wim: <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#processing-protocol-server-mapped-setup">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#processing-protocol-server-mapped-setup</a>
is your answer</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Wim</cite>> Content-Range-Mapping:
t:npt 10-20;include-setup=bytes 0-2000,4000-10000/20000</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> ah, yes, that needs
to be included in CRM with multiple byte ranges - that's
correct IMHO</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Wim</cite>> Content-Range-Mapping:
t:npt 10-20/0-38;include-setup=bytes
0-2000,4000-10000/20000</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> no, you cannot ask
for multiple time ranges</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>davy</cite>> 0-38 is the total
duration</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> ah,ok, fine</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> how about this:</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>>
Content-Range-Mapping: t:npt 10-20/0-38;include-setup eq bytes
0-2000,4000-10000/20000</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> a keyword "eq" in
the middle with spaces around</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>conrad</cite>> in 5.2.2.3, can you
receive multiple byte-ranges in the Range-Redirect response
header?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>conrad</cite>> ah yes you can
:)</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>conrad</cite>> (the example only
had one)</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>FD</cite>> Assuming bytes 0-2000
correspond to include-setup, I would prefer:
Content-Range-Mapping: t:npt 10-20/0-38;include-setup eq bytes
4000-10000,0-2000/20000</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>>
Content-Range-Mapping: (t:npt 10-20/0-38;include-setup)
eq (bytes 0-2000,4000-10000/20000) ?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> let's use
<...></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> then replace 'eq' by
'equal'?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>>
Content-Range-Mapping: <t:npt 10-20/0-38;include-setup>
eq <bytes 0-2000,4000-10000/20000></p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> Yves: it looks a bit
ugly, to be honest...</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> no need for
parenthesis</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> CRM: t:npt
10-20/0-38;include-setup = bytes 0-2000,4000-1000/2000</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>>
Content-Range-Mapping: t:npt 10-20/0-38;include-setup
equals bytes 0-2000,4000-10000/20000</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> a=b is usually
readable</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> CRM: (t:npt
10-20/0-38;include-setup) = (bytes 0-2000,4000-1000/2000)</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> and more efficient</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Wim:</cite> '=' is better to parse</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> only one = is allowed
=> no need for parenthesis</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> remember that it has
to be parsed by machines</p>
<p class='phone'>We need a primary separator (e.g. =) and a
secondary one (the ';')</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> (and debugged only by
knowledgeable humans :) )</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hackerjack</cite>> Would this work?
CRM: t:npt 10-20/0-38;include-setup bytes
0-2000,4000-1000/2000</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> please let's have a
separator or some soft</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hackerjack</cite>> ok, you've
convinced me:-)</p>
<p class='phone'>First option: Content-Range-Mapping: t:npt
10-20;include-setup=bytes 0-2000,4000-10000/20000</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> why not removing
';'</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> Content-Range-Mapping:
t:npt 10-20 include-setup=bytes 0-2000,4000-10000/20000</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>FD</cite>> Content-Range-Mapping:
t:npt 10-20,include-setup=bytes 0-2000,4000-10000/20000</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> CRM: (t:npt
10-20/0-38;include-setup) (bytes 0-2000,4000-1000/2000)</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> {} instead?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>davy</cite>> Content-Range-Mapping:
t:npt 10-20 include-setup>bytes 0-2000,4000-10000/20000
?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> if we remove ';' ,
we should just make it a series of statements:</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>>
Content-Range-Mapping: t:npt 10-20 include-setup bytes
0-2000,4000-10000/20000</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> silvia, yes hence the
{ token* }</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hackerjack</cite>> §, anyone?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>PROPOSES:</cite> CRM: {t:npt
10-20/0-38;include-setup} {bytes 0-2000,4000-1000/2000}</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> better with an = in
the middle (clearer in the intend), but no big deal if it's not
there</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>PROPOSED:</cite> CRM: {t:npt
10-20/0-38;include-setup}={bytes 0-2000,4000-1000/2000}</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>davy</cite>> +1</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>erik</cite>> +1</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> sounds good to me</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Wim</cite>> +1</p>
<p class='phone'>+1</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>>
Content-Range-Mapping: t:npt 10-20; include-setup; bytes
0-2000,4000-10000/20000</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hackerjack</cite>> -0</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> based on:</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> Set-Cookie:
UserID=JohnDoe; Max-Age=3600; Version=1</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> I checked how other
headers work at <a href=
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_headers">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_headers</a></p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> ok</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> +1 on the above</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> it's the talkative
header ;)</p>
<p class='phone'><strong class='resolution'>RESOLUTION: new
syntax for the Content-Range-Mapping header,
"Content-Range-Mapping: {t:npt 10-20/0-38;include-setup}={bytes
0-2000,4000-1000/2000}"</strong></p>
<p class='phone'>ACTION-166?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> ACTION-166 -- Yves
Lafon to review the ABNF syntax of the HTTP headers introduced
by the Media Fragment URI spec -- due 2010-06-02 -- OPEN</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/166">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/166</a></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Yves:</cite> I will produce the code for
checking the grammar of the ABNF syntax of the headers as for
the URI syntax</p>
<p class='phone'>close ACTION-166</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> ACTION-166 Review
the ABNF syntax of the HTTP headers introduced by the Media
Fragment URI spec closed</p><a name="action03" id=
"action03"></a>
<p class='irc'><<cite>scribe</cite>>
<strong>ACTION:</strong> Yves to produce the code that will
check the grammar of both the URI syntax and the Headers syntax
[recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html#action03">http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html#action03</a>]</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> Created ACTION-173
- Produce the code that will check the grammar of both the URI
syntax and the Headers syntax [on Yves Lafon - due
2010-06-22].</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> there is common bits
between the uri syntax and the header syntax<br />
... could we split this into 3 blocks: common syntax, uri
syntax and header syntax ?</p><a name="action04" id=
"action04"></a>
<p class='irc'><<cite>scribe</cite>>
<strong>ACTION:</strong> Yves to produce the common syntax
block [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html#action04">http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html#action04</a>]</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> Created ACTION-174
- Produce the common syntax block [on Yves Lafon - due
2010-06-22].</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> we are also
repeating some code from the HTTP spec</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> so it's 4 blocks
really</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Yves:</cite> we are importing some stuff
as a convenience ... but the normative is in the HTTP spec
referenced</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> except where we
extend it ;)</p>
<p class='phone'>ACTION-137?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> ACTION-137 -- Jack
Jansen to check that section 5.2 is implementable using the
protocol -- due 2010-02-10 -- OPEN</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/137">
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/137</a></p>
<p class='phone'>We found back what was the
<strong>ACTION:</strong>-)</p>
<p class='phone'>It is actually to read and review the
_current_ section 5.1!</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> I will put this into the
section 7!<br />
... I think the section 7 will not be normative ... but this
important stuff that needs to be said</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> ACTION-137 is
ongoing<br />
... now rephrased into: Merge the content of section 5.1in the
future section 7 (and check whether it is implementable using
the protocol?)</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> 3:13pm here</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> looking back at some past
actions we should close</p>
<p class='phone'>drop ACTION-34</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hackerjack</cite>> trackbot,
help</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> See <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc">http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/irc</a>
for help</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hackerjack</cite>> thanks!</p>
<p class='phone'>close ACTION-34</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> ACTION-34 Look at
python-url library to see whether he could implement the logic
on client side closed</p>
<p class='phone'>comment ACTION-35 we might come back to these
if we are lacking implementations, but no resources on this
now</p>
<p class='phone'>close ACTION-35</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> ACTION-35 Look at
curl and/or wget to see whether the logic could be implemented
on client side closed</p>
<h3 id="item05">5. Other dimensions (track, id, xywh)</h3>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> I would like to make a
disctinction between the URI syntax part and the HTTP handling
part<br />
... the first being well thought, sort-of<br />
... the second hasn't been enough discussed</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> let's talk first about
the xywh dimension<br />
... we have implementation on client (Jakub)<br />
... purely on client side<br />
... nothing transmitted over the wire</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> I prefer it to stay
that way actually</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> xywh will only be
standardized in URI and not in protocol</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> yes silvia, question is
whether we put strong statements or not in the spec</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> reason being that
right now there are no codecs I believe where spatial cropping
can be done by byte ranges</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> but we should add a
note that it is possible to extend this in the future?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> well there is no need
to bind that to byte ranges</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> but not saying
anything means that the door is not closed</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> agreed</p>
<p class='phone'>OK, we have the text already written in the
spec</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>scribe:</cite> for the explanation</p>
<p class='phone'>"Note that the specification does not foresee
a Range dimension for spatial media fragments since they are
typically resolved and interpreted by the User Agent (i.e.,
spatial fragment extraction is not performed on server-side)
due to the following reasons: "</p>
<p class='phone'>Perfect!</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> two use cases for this, the
grey overlay and the sprite that CSS people want to do</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> track dimension<br />
... clear use cases in the accessibility community</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Davy:</cite> implementation problem with
tracks when we want to cache it ... too many characters to
store!</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Wim:</cite> we can always have the
problem, a time range yields too many byte ranges! ... but it
is rare for a time range, while it happens for a track
range</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Davy:</cite> how Ninsuna currently
works, is via the '?' ... a redirect from a hash to the
query</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Jack:</cite> should we write this in our
new section 7?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> discussion how to handle
track and id ... appealing solution from Jack</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hackerjack</cite>> Silvia, you
still here?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> do a redirect in the
HTTP sense (30x)<br />
... to a URI with a query</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> a redirect can
always be performed - I think we should describe this
generally</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> we are documenting the
solution ... which in a nutshell comes back to always do a
redirection when there is track or id selection<br />
... solution is cacheable but not 'mergeable'</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> "mergeable"?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>silvia</cite>> you can always
combine a query with a fragment request</p>
<p class='phone'>yeah yeah, we are not talking about this</p>
<h3 id="item06">6. Handling track and id</h3>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> I'm giving a try to
describe what is the envisionned solution for parsing Media
Fragment URI that contains a track or an id selection<br />
... Case 1: URI requested is under the form: <a href=
"http://www.example.com/video.ogg#track=1">http://www.example.com/video.ogg#track=1</a>
or <a href=
"http://www.example.com/video.ogg#track=myaudio">http://www.example.com/video.ogg#track=myaudio</a><br />
... The UA sends a Range request to the server<br />
... this request has a Range header, "Range:
track=myaudio"<br />
... the server sends a 30x reply indicating a Redirect<br />
... this reply has a Location header, "Location: <a href=
"http://www.example.com/video.ogg?track=myaudio">http://www.example.com/video.ogg?track=myaudio</a>"<br />
... (where the # has been transformed by a ? per server
decision)<br />
... the UA sends another request, a normal one this time:
<a href=
"http://www.example.com/video.ogg?track=myaudio">http://www.example.com/video.ogg?track=myaudio</a><br />
... the server will serve a complete new resource (per the use
of the query parameter) with a 200 reply<br />
... in addition, we enforce that the second reply contains a
Link header, pointing to the original resource, i.e. <a href=
"http://www.example.com/video.ogg">http://www.example.com/video.ogg</a><br />
... Case 2: Combination of track selection and time
ranges<br />
... URI requested under the form: <a href=
"http://www.example.com/video.ogg#track=myaudio&t=20">http://www.example.com/video.ogg#track=myaudio&t=20</a>,50<br />
... The UA sends a Range request to the server<br />
... this request has again a Range header, e.g., "Range:
track=myaudio,t:npt=20-50"</p>
<p class='phone'>the server sends a 30x reply indicating a
Redirect because of the presence of the track selection</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>scribe:</cite> this reply has a Location
header that points to a Media Fragment URI, "Location: <a href=
"http://www.example.com/video.ogg?track=myaudio#t=20">http://www.example.com/video.ogg?track=myaudio#t=20</a>,50"<br />
... the UA sends another request, a RANGE request because of
the presence of the '#': <a href=
"http://www.example.com/video.ogg?track=myaudio#t=20">http://www.example.com/video.ogg?track=myaudio#t=20</a>,50<br />
... the server will serve a Partial Content reply (206) of a
newly constructed resource<br />
... in addition, we enforce that the second replu contains a
Link header, pointing to the original resource, i.e. <a href=
"http://www.example.com/video.ogg">http://www.example.com/video.ogg</a></p>
<p class='phone'>s/replu.reply</p>
<p class='phone'>s/replu/reply</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Raphael:</cite> In summary, we _always_
handle the track and id selections by a Redirection<br />
... we keep the original author intention of using a hash by
putting back a link to the original resource with the Link
header<br />
... this solution is cacheable by the current
infrastructure<br />
... This needs to be approved tomorrow</p>
<h3 id="item07">7. Housekeeping</h3>
<p class='phone'>close ACTION-169</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> ACTION-169 Reserve
the bridge for 15&16 June mediafrag f2f closed</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> just finishedchanges
for Content-Range-Mapping, including examples</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Yves</cite>> can someone check
this? (especially examples, the 307 case of remapping being of
interest)</p><a name="action05" id="action05"></a>
<p class='irc'><<cite>scribe</cite>>
<strong>ACTION:</strong> Yves to update the grammar parsing
automatically generated code for the URI syntax [recorded in
<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html#action05">http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html#action05</a>]</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> Created ACTION-175
- Update the grammar parsing automatically generated code for
the URI syntax [on Yves Lafon - due 2010-06-22].</p>
<p class='phone'>ACTION-70?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> ACTION-70 -- Jack
Jansen to commit in CVS (code directory) his python code doing
the parsing on client side of the media fragment -- due
2009-10-14 -- OPEN</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/70">http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/tracker/actions/70</a></p>
<p class='phone'>close ACTION-137</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> ACTION-137 Merge
the content of section 5.1in the future section 7 (and check
whether it is implementable using the protocol?) closed</p>
<p class='phone'>close ACTION-172</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> ACTION-172 Work on
the existing Section 7, and draft 7.2 closed</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>ALL:</cite> we need to review the
section 7</p>
<p class='phone'>close ACTION-70</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> ACTION-70 Commit
in CVS (code directory) his python code doing the parsing on
client side of the media fragment closed</p>
<p class='phone'>close ACTION-160</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> ACTION-160 Send an
email to the Internationalization WG + us reporting the issue
for track names closed</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>See:</cite> <a href=
"http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jun/0022.html">
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Jun/0022.html</a></p>
<p class='phone'>close ACTION-171</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>trackbot</cite>> ACTION-171 Modify
the ABNF syntax of the Content-Range-Mapping header to take
into account this resolution closed</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Tomorrow:</cite> come back to the
discussion on handling tracks and id<br />
... go through all ISSUES<br />
... + demo of test cases framework from Davy / Wim</p>
<p class='phone'>[meeting adjourned]</p>
</div>
<h2><a name="ActionSummary" id="ActionSummary">Summary of Action
Items</a></h2><!-- Action Items -->
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> Jack to work on
the existing Section 7, and draft 7.2 [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html#action02">http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html#action02</a>]<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> Yves to modify
the ABNF syntax of the Content-Range-Mapping header to take into
account this resolution [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01">http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html#action01</a>]<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> Yves to produce
the code that will check the grammar of both the URI syntax and
the Headers syntax [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html#action03">http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html#action03</a>]<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> Yves to produce
the common syntax block [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html#action04">http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html#action04</a>]<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> Yves to update
the grammar parsing automatically generated code for the URI
syntax [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html#action05">http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html#action05</a>]<br />
<br />
[End of minutes]<br />
<hr />
<address>
Minutes formatted by David Booth's <a href=
"http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm">
scribe.perl</a> version 1.135 (<a href=
"http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/">CVS log</a>)<br />
$Date: 2010/06/15 15:34:42 $
</address>
<div class="diagnostics">
<hr />
<h2>Scribe.perl diagnostic output</h2>[Delete this section
before finalizing the minutes.]<br />
<pre>
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20
Check for newer version at <a href=
"http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/">http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/</a>
Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)
Succeeded: s/mediua/media/
Succeeded: s/showinf/showing/
FAILED: s/???/Wim/
Succeeded: s/that Apache/that the server/
Succeeded: s/sililar/similar/
Succeeded: s/??/Wim/
Succeeded: s/respnse/response/
Succeeded: s/or/of/
Succeeded: s/and server (Ninsuna)//
WARNING: Bad s/// command: s/replu.reply
FAILED: s/replu/reply/
Found Scribe: raphael
Inferring ScribeNick: raphael
Found ScribeNick: raphael
Found Scribe: Raphael
Found ScribeNick: Raphael
WARNING: Replacing list of attendees.
Old list: +33.4.93.00.aaaa Meeting_Room
New list: +61.2.801.2.aaaa silvia
Default Present: +61.2.801.2.aaaa, silvia
WARNING: Replacing previous Present list. (Old list: Jakub, Jack, Yves, Raphael, Erik, Davy, Wim, Franck, Silvia_(remote))
Use 'Present+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list,
such as: <dbooth> Present+ Jacob, Jack, Yves, Raphael, Erik, davy, Wim, Franck, Silvia
Present: Jacob Jack Yves Raphael Erik davy Wim Franck Silvia
Regrets: Michael
Agenda: <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/SixthF2FAgenda">http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/SixthF2FAgenda</a>
Found Date: 15 Jun 2010
Guessing minutes URL: <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html">http://www.w3.org/2010/06/15-mediafrag-minutes.html</a>
People with action items: jack yves
</pre>[End of <a href=
"http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm">
scribe.perl</a> diagnostic output]
</div>
</body>
</html>