01-swxg-minutes.html 36.3 KB
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<html lang='en'>
<head>
  <title>SWXG Minutes -- 07 Jul 2009</title>
  <link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET" href="http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/base.css">
  <link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET" href="http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/public.css">
  <link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET" href="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/minutes-style.css">
  <meta content="SV_MEETING_TITLE" name="Title">  
  <meta content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>

<body>
<p><a href="http://www.w3.org/"><img src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_home" alt="W3C" border="0"
height="48" width="72"></a> 

</p>

<h1>SWXG Minutes</h1>
<h2>07 Jul 2009</h2>





<h2><a name="attendees">Attendees</a></h2>

<div class="intro">
<dl>
<dt>Present</dt>
<dd></dd>
<dt>Regrets</dt>
<dd>Hakan, PeterF, bblfish</dd>
<dt>Chair</dt>
<dd>DKA and hhalpin</dd>
<dt>Scribe</dt>
<dd>Carine</dd>

</dl>
</div>

<h2>Contents</h2>
<ul>
  <li><a href="#agenda">Topics</a>
	<ol>
	<li><a href="#item01">Convene, Approval of last week's minutes</a></li>
<li><a href="#item02">General Organization - Actions</a></li>
<li><a href="#item03">User Stories</a></li>

<li><a href="#item04">Invited Guest Invitations</a></li>
<li><a href="#item05">Privacy Jungle</a></li>

	</ol>
  </li>
  <li><a href="#ActionSummary">Summary of Action Items</a></li>
</ul>
<hr>
<div class="meeting">

<p class='phone'>


</p>

<p class='phone'>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; zakim mute me
</p>

</p>

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>scribe</cite>&gt; Scribe: Carine
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>scribe</cite>&gt; scribenick: caribou
</p>

<h3 id="item01">Convene, Approval of last week's minutes</h3>
<p class='irc'>

&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; PROPOSED: to approve SWXG WG Weekly -- 24 June 2009 as a true record
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; RESOLVED: approved SWXG WG Weekly -- 24 June 2009 as a true record
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; PROPOSED: to meet again Wed, 8th July
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tinkster</cite>&gt; Minutes are here BTW - <a href="http://www.w3.org/2009/06/24-swxg-minutes.html">http://www.w3.org/2009/06/24-swxg-minutes.html</a>

</p>

<h3 id="item02">General Organization - Actions</h3>
<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; RESOLVED: to meet again Wed, 8th of July
</p>

<a name="action01"></a>
<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>scribe</cite>&gt; <strong>ACTION:</strong> bblfish and hhalpin to write up kaliya's talk for future report

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; Created ACTION-47 - And hhalpin to write up kaliya's talk for future report [on Henry Story - due 2009-07-08].
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>scribe</cite>&gt; <strong>[PENDING]</strong>
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>DKA:</cite> Do we endorse the Identity Commons Purpose and Principles?

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; <a href="http://wiki.idcommons.net/Purpose_And_Principles">http://wiki.idcommons.net/Purpose_And_Principles</a>
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>jsalvachua</cite>&gt; +1 sounds good (as principles)
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>AndreaP</cite>&gt; +1 from me too

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; The only issue is that we're not a long-standing group.
</p>

<p class='phone'>
Self-organization?
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tinkster</cite>&gt; +1
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>hhalpin:</cite> I don't know what that means <br>
... I mostly agree with the principles
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>DKA</cite>&gt; PROPOSED RESOLUTION: The SWXG supports and endorses the Identity Commons purposes and principles; we share these principles as part of the core values of our effort.
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>hhalpin:</cite> but we should be clear that we do have a charter

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; perhaps we could feed back to the ID commons
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>DKA</cite>&gt; +1
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; +1

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>AndreaP</cite>&gt; +1
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>jsalvachua</cite>&gt; +1
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>MacTed</cite>&gt; +1

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mattroweshow</cite>&gt; +1
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tinkster</cite>&gt; +1
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>FabGandon</cite>&gt; +1

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>DKA</cite>&gt; RESOLUTION: The SWXG supports and endorses the Identity Commons purposes and principles; we share these principles as part of the core values of our effort.
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; +1
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<strong class='resolution'>RESOLUTION: The SWXG supports and endorses the Identity Commons purposes and principles; we share these principles as part of the core values of our effort</strong>

</p>

<a name="action02"></a>
<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; <strong>ACTION:</strong> hhalpin to send e-mail to id commons saying we endorse their principles, have a link to us
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; Created ACTION-48 - Send e-mail to id commons saying we endorse their principles, have a link to us [on Harry Halpin - due 2009-07-08].
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/RequirementsAndUseCases">http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/RequirementsAndUseCases</a>
</p>

<a name="action03"></a>
<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>scribe</cite>&gt; <strong>ACTION:</strong> <strong>[DONE]</strong> hhalpin to create draft use-case document in W3C cvs
</p>

<a name="action04"></a>
<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>scribe</cite>&gt; <strong>ACTION:</strong> <strong>[CONTINUES]</strong> danbri follow up re whether to use survey tool at w3c or elsewhere
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; +1
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; +1
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; +1
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; It's just a form without content, but it does look pretty and shows you can edit a full W3C spec using a wiki.

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>DKA</cite>&gt; +1
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>AndreaP</cite>&gt; +1
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; yes, Harry, i think that was the spirit/intent

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; The audience of the survey is non-W3C member.
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; or surveying businesses which are NOT currently part of W3C
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>DKA:</cite> if we want to do survey, it makes sense to use the W3C tool

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; It's a survey of *non*-members
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>DKA:</cite> but beyond the WG, another tool would be easier
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; yes, makes sense

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tinkster</cite>&gt; yes, makes sense to me.
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; I use surey gizmo
</p>

<p class='phone'>
WBS has capability for public questionnaires, AFAIK
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; surveygizmo.com
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; are we intending to send these surveys to end users or to service providers ?
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Christine:</cite> I use surveygizmo, it's free, lots of reporting capabilities

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; sounds like an endorsement to me
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Christine:</cite> very flexible
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>DKA</cite>&gt; Another one Techcrunch seems to be using:  Polldaddy.com

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Since Christine is probably going to taking the lead on the survey, then I'd say survey gizmo is right.
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; ah hah!
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; :)

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>DKA</cite>&gt; PROPOSED RESOLUTION: We'll use internal WBS tool for internal W3C polls, we'll use some tbd external system (e.g. surveymonkey, surveygizmo) to do external surveys.
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Sounds good to me.
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; +1

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>AndreaP</cite>&gt; +1
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>DKA</cite>&gt; +1
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; +1

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>jsalvachua</cite>&gt; +1
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; +1
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tinkster</cite>&gt; +1

</p>

<p class='phone'>
<strong class='resolution'>RESOLUTION: We'll use internal WBS tool for internal W3C polls, we'll use some tbd external system (e.g. surveymonkey, surveygizmo) to do external surveys.</strong>
</p>

<h3 id="item03">User Stories</h3>
<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; i wish user stories were called use cases
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; tpa?

</p>

<a name="action05"></a>
<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>scribe</cite>&gt; <strong>ACTION:</strong> <strong>[DONE]</strong> tpa to W3C-style "edit" user stories
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; can someone past the URI to the wiki page with user stories?

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; paste!
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Tim:</cite> not much to say, first round of editing done
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/UserStories">http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/UserStories</a>

</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Tim:</cite> transformed in templates, people should fill in blanks <br>
... we may allow more time for adding more stories
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; i have a couple i could add
</p>

<p class='irc'>

&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; I think it needs to be expanded
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>DKA:</cite> it seems that we need more material
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; what about having use cases be an item in the survey?
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; Oshani and I came up with some we think are interesting
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; i am happy to go through / edit the Privacy and Context  subsection, we will see if have any use cases in Garlik with we use to protect our customers privacy
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; question on survey: rank these use cases? are there any use cases missing?
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; what about stories of the past?
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>DKA:</cite> there are stories about the present and about the future
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>Tim</cite>&gt; I like the idea of prioritization - this could be an internal survey at first.

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; there are good stories around Jennifer Rigley and context
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; in the past
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; +1 on noticing "future" vs "past" issue

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; yes, prioritization
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; can we just add metadata describing the type of use case?
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; +1

</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>DKA:</cite> maybe we want to let more user stories be added before prioritization
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tinkster</cite>&gt; I still have one user story I need to add.
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tinkster</cite>&gt; close ACTION-19

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; ACTION-19 Document developer stories on wiki. closed
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; maybe generate more cases first before prioritization.
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; I like adding some metadata to the general template (suggestion by ron)

</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>DKA:</cite> anybody who wants to add a story can take an action
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; we could add metadata to the stories
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tinkster</cite>&gt; ACTION-42?

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; ACTION-42 -- Toby Inkster to document danbri's microblogging provenance question as a user story. -- due 2009-06-24 -- OPEN
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; <a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/track/actions/42">http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/track/actions/42</a>
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; Ill take an action to add a usecase

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; unless Oshani  wants it
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Tim:</cite> talk in a week or two when we have more stories
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; can we add to the template an element about the user's device/access network? or do we assume that all are PC + mobile access?

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tpa</cite>&gt; cperey, good point
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tpa</cite>&gt; cperey, basically we don't have any stories that hinge upon differences in access
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; but would it not be valuable for there to be such differences?

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; i dont know how to action on myself
</p>

<a name="action06"></a>
<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tpa</cite>&gt; <strong>ACTION:</strong> tpa to look for similar use cases list to expand ours
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; Sorry, couldn't find user - tpa
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Christine:</cite> In the template, can we note if it is assumed that the service is accessed by PC or mobile
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>DKA:</cite> "is it a use case primarily in mobile?"
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; should we define what is meant by mobile vs PC?, like the criteria cperey just mentioned
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>DKA:</cite> I'd not categorize as PC vs. Mobile
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; ok, then let's just add metadata. yeah pre-conditions

</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>DKA:</cite> mobile environnement vs. "desk"
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>jsalvachua</cite>&gt; perhaps could be scenario with a moblie part on it
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Christine:</cite> "this user is mobile"

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; +1 cperey
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Christine:</cite> before we edit stories, add it to the template
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Soren:</cite> it's more about which data is available <br>

... e.g. location
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; but would bandwidth be the "quality of the data"?
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; who was speaking ?
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tinkster</cite>&gt; Maybe that should be the beginning of a user story - i.e. why don't we have the same information available whether mobile or otherwise?

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; quality of data seems ambiguous to me?
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Soren:</cite> conditions in which the network is accessed
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; i think the possible preconditions might be enumerated

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; ff 3.5 gives geolocation
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; hehe
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; context could be "I'm in  call"

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; that's probably something that phone (device) knows but a PC does not
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>DKA:</cite> it's becoming an increasingly fuzzy distinction
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; you can be on a call on skype your PC could know that

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; but isn't it our responsiblity to clarify its defnition?
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>DKA:</cite> we should have something in the template
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; haha!

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; who is speaking?
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; :)
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; ?

</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Soren:</cite> I agree, browsers everywhere, not only on PC
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; but would bandwidth be the "quality of the data"?
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; yes, I agree

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; can we please get the name of speaker?
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Soren:</cite> differences in data transmission (bandwidth, security...)
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; I would like to work/collaborate on that

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; with someone else
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; bandwidth is variable
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; I would like to collaborate on additional definition on template for use cases

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; ?
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; my phone switches between networks everywhere i go thereby giving me different bandwidth all the time
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; to clarify use case mobile/fixed

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Notice that we're already 30 minutes in....
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; Ronald Reck
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; im muted

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; I will be happy to work with Ron on this. Misha spoke?
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; me ?
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; no i wasn't speaking

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; the person sounded germna
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; german to me
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; ok, thanks for clarifcation

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; ah!! thank you!
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; I am happy to assist/collaborate but no actions for me
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; agreed

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; :-)
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; I'm learning
</p>

<a name="action07"></a>
<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>scribe</cite>&gt; <strong>ACTION:</strong> Sören to propose addition to the template for user stories for conditions

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; Sorry, couldn't find user - Sören
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tinkster</cite>&gt; happy to leave them
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tinkster</cite>&gt; danbri not on call, but on IRC.

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; I can suggest some another speaker
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>DKA</cite>&gt; Danbri do you have someone from Opera to talk about widgets?
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Eran Hammer-Lahav

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; OASIS XRDS-Simple
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tinkster</cite>&gt; Now called "XRD" IIRC.
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; harry, can you please adjust your microphone/mouth piece?

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; better
</p>

<h3 id="item04">Invited Guest Invitations</h3>
<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; XRIs ?
</p>

<p class='irc'>

&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; LRDD Update (Resource Descriptor Discovery)
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; they are they used in OAuth endpoints
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; &lt;yawn&gt;..how relevant to SWXG?
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; HTTP and HTML.
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Link Headers and Link elements in HTML.
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>hhalpin:</cite> we need a standardised way to discover info about someone on the web

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; it is used in Oauth and in openid, as far as i am aware
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Mischa - what's your opinion of XRD-Simple implementations?
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; I can report on this

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tinkster</cite>&gt; XRDS is in OpenID 2, but not 1.x. XRD/XRDS-Simple is not.
</p>

<p class='phone'>
Kaliya?: XRDS is part of OpenID spec
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; agree 100%
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; excellent
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>Adam</cite>&gt; some quick overview: <a href="http://www.hueniverse.com/hueniverse/2009/03/the-discovery-protocol-stack.html">http://www.hueniverse.com/hueniverse/2009/03/the-discovery-protocol-stack.html</a> and the internet draft: <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hammer-discovery-03">http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hammer-discovery-03</a>
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; privacy jungle +1
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>danbri</cite>&gt; DKA, re opera people ... yes once we send a formal invite... should i just invite an agenda topic and invite them?
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>danbri</cite>&gt; ie. it's agreed in principle and definite interest

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; move ahead go Soren/Joseph
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>danbri</cite>&gt; but they want to see exact topics before deciding who to send
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>danbri</cite>&gt; and when

</p>

<a name="action08"></a>
<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; <strong>ACTION:</strong> hhalpin to contact eran to talk, also about LRDD.
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>trackbot</cite>&gt; Created ACTION-50 - Contact eran to talk, also about LRDD. [on Harry Halpin - due 2009-07-08].
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; danbri - I just thought Eran could explain hook up between LRDD and XRD/XRD-Simple
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>Adam</cite>&gt; +1
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>DKA:</cite> we need to articulate why openness is good for social network business
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>Adam</cite>&gt; good for businesses +1 :)
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>danbri</cite>&gt; sure. am talking re opera action only
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Since he is already actively seeking comments on it.

</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>DKA:</cite> I'd like to take the resolution that we will work on that
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Oh, I thought opera action was based on w3c widgets/open social compatibility
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; yes

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; I've posted to the mailing list
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>DKA:</cite> if we want to convince people of the relevance of the work and also bring industry people to the group
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tinkster</cite>&gt; Michael Hausenblas (DERI) is also pretty interested/informed on LRDD/XRD/etc.

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; it would be nice if there was work item which is focusing on why good for business
</p>

<h3 id="item05">Privacy Jungle</h3>
<p class='phone'>
<a href="http://preibusch.de/publications/social_networks/privacy_jungle_dataset.htm">http://preibusch.de/publications/social_networks/privacy_jungle_dataset.htm</a>
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; agree...

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; soren: if we look at alexa, it's unclear if it's social networking sites
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; blogging service is that a socialnetwork?
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; soren: stripped it down to 45 sites, got rid of site not in English as we can't discover then.

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; i dont see why not, you have trackbacks
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; I agree with this premise 100%
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Soren:</cite> only sites where you can make friends on the site

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>Adam</cite>&gt; <a href="http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html">http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html</a>
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; IMHO, the paper is very impressive
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; +1 rreck

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; social networking platforms= white label social networking servers
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; quick question - why exclude content-sharing sites like Flickr?
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>jsalvachua</cite>&gt; +1 rreck too

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; user counts unreliable
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Joseph:</cite> some sites that claim to be "leading" sites are not
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; good question hhalpin

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; I wonder if Joe and Soren are on the IRC
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; maybe not.
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; it doesnt seem like they are

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; i hadnt even thought of that
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tinkster</cite>&gt; Joseph: statistical data about social networks given to advertisers seems more reliable than data given in press releases and to general public.
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Joseph:</cite> categories for the sites: languages, metadata, data collected, privacy controls offered to users <br>

... key aspects of privacy policy of the sites
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; "advertise on us" links or sites put through "advertising networks"
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>ZZZ:</cite> how did you access this info? (number of users...)
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Joseph:</cite> fact sheets or surveys <br>

... we could have included flickr <br>
... their main use cases is vacation pictures to be shared with friends <br>
... you can consider a site to be a SN depending on how people use it <br>
... it's hard to draw a line
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; and there could be more user populations on any service
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Joseph:</cite> the research in privacy is not new, and the lock-in effect has existed before <br>

... e.g. Amazon <br>
... in SN it's worse because there are all your friends and they would not follow you if you change
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tinkster</cite>&gt; Hopefully you'd just lose your links to your friends - you wouldn't actually lose all your friends.
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; agree with this definition
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; of lock-in effects of services
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Joseph:</cite> Users can't take data to another network <br>
... sites do not promote privacy as an argument on the front page
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; +1 on that this is a problem

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; +1 for sure
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>AndreaP</cite>&gt; +1
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; problem but the user education is not there

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; i think they are pandering to the lowest common denominator
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>oshani</cite>&gt; I think "privacy as an argument on the front page" will chase some users away
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Joseph:</cite> it's not that it is not mentioned at all. You can still dig up a privacy policy <br>

... they claim how good their practices are
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; i think Soren is speaking now
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Joseph:</cite> sites communicate on privacy depending on the targeted audience
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; i think this means -&gt;privacy doesnt sell

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; :)
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; this was very useful stuff
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; I think we should keep going

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; but people can leave...
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; great question
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Mischa:</cite> did you study what happens when you delete info from the sites? <br>
... e.g. if data is really removed?
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Joseph:</cite> most sites don't claim they will remove the data <br>
... some sites do it partially, but most sites don't make any claim
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; how does Joe conduct this research?
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Mischa:</cite> EU regulations? govt regulations?
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Joseph:</cite> experiment on photos, they are still there
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>DKA</cite>&gt; Chair: HHalpin
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Joseph:</cite> some sites outsource the photos hosting <br>

... to delivery networks <br>
... facebook uses akamai
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; No problem DKA
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Joseph:</cite> so if you delete the photo on Facebook, the photo might be available for 30 days after
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>rreck</cite>&gt; i concur 30 days is not reasonable
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Joseph:</cite> privacy policy says "it will be deleted after a reasonable period of time" <br>
... the UK data protection act and EU data protection directive lay out things <br>
... it is questionnable if 30 days would be ok
</p>

<p class='phone'>

<cite>Mischa:</cite> Do they tell if data will be sent to other countries for storage?
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Joseph:</cite> No. The "content delivery network" is under their control, they have the master copy, but the rest is unknown <br>
... once a photo has been seen in the UK from the akamai, there's local caching <br>
... it's a huge grey area legally <br>
... the larger sites are the tip of the iceberg in privacy practices <br>
... the smaller sites often started with bad privacy

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; been interesting, very good work, we should build on this.
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>mischat</cite>&gt; dito in orkut is massive in iran too
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; ++ to what Joe is saying about a broad view of what social networking should be defined. Great deal of diversity

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>cperey</cite>&gt; our responsibility is to have broad view
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Mischa:</cite> recent story about last.fm <br>

... are there different levels of privacy?
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Soren:</cite> problem with affiliate companies <br>
... law is less strict when it comes to transferring info to affiliated companies <br>
... it's difficult for the user to follow where the info is going
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>oshani</cite>&gt; another similar story: <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/06/26/1331218/Of-Catty-Rants-and-Copyrights?from=rss">http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/06/26/1331218/Of-Catty-Rants-and-Copyrights?from=rss</a>

</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Soren:</cite> it's very hard to make a guess from their terms and conditions <br>
... never seen 'affiliates' defined anywhere
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>hhalpin:</cite> geographical diversity pb <br>
... from the W3C perspective, interest in i18n <br>

... in some of your metrics, balance in non-english sites?
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Soren:</cite> assessed the sites on accessibility, mobile OK, ... <br>
... low scores, disappointing news <br>
... we included non-english sites but difficult to assess privacy policies in foreign languages, and also vs. local culture
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>hhalpin:</cite> unclarity of privacy policy phrasing

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; harry: can we cluster privacy practices?
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Soren:</cite> it was hard to distinguish clusters
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; harry: due to privacy policy?

</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Soren:</cite> it's hard to see prevalent practices
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Joseph:</cite> we might try to diff the privacy texts, to see the %age of wording reuse
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; And POWDER?

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; P3P hasn't taken off.
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>FabGandon</cite>&gt; beleives Lorry Cranor did a lot on that subject indeed when working on P3P
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Soren:</cite> P3P was designed to communicate privacy policies, but less than 10% of the sites implement P3P <br>

... and some are doing it wrong
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>harry:</cite> is it doable to present a human-readable privacy policy?
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Soren:</cite> several projects going this way
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>AndreaP</cite>&gt; POWDER might be good if you would like to state which are the privacy policies adopted by a given set of resources.

</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Soren:</cite> it's worth investigating <br>
... also somewhere where W3C could step in
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Harry:</cite> I'm interested in links to these projects?
</p>

<cite>Soren:</cite> I will try to put something together
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tinkster</cite>&gt; Perhaps a cut-down dialect of P3P in RDFa might increase update? I think danbri was looking at something like that.
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>harry:</cite> Can we use some of your results in the XG?
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Soren:</cite> yes, publicly available
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; that was a pretty hacky list :)
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Mischa:</cite> .... list of SN
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; should blogging be under social networking?
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Joseph:</cite> we did look at some of the ones you have on your list
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tinkster</cite>&gt; danbri, while you were gone I said: Perhaps a cut-down dialect of P3P in RDFa might increase update? I think danbri was looking at something like that.

</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; soren: youtube, blogger, take off
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Joseph:</cite> youtube not really a SN <br>
... friends' communication is limited
</p>

<p class='phone'>

<cite>harry:</cite> whatever has a friends list could be a SNS
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; soren: Gmail is pretty huge social network
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; mischa: gmail using facebook connect
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Mischa:</cite> there's a connect between facebook and gmail
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Joseph:</cite> 2 ideas in textual analysis of policies <br>
... identify reuse of boilerplate text <br>
... difficulty to read <br>
... it might also be interesting to identify relevant dimensions of a privacy policy <br>

... and see how they differ
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>melvster</cite>&gt; in the uk i believe they have to give you all the data they have on you, but you need to pay a small fee
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>Joseph:</cite> for some observations you need a real account
</p>

<p class='phone'>
<cite>harry:</cite> the study is very educational <br>

... interested in discussion on the mailing list
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>tinkster</cite>&gt; melvster, organisations have the right to charge a £10 fee for gathering, printing and sending your data, but many will waive that.
</p>

<p class='irc'>
&lt;<cite>hhalpin</cite>&gt; Call adjourned
</p>


</div>
<h2><a name="ActionSummary">Summary of Action Items</a></h2>

<!-- Action Items -->
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> bblfish and hhalpin to write up kaliya's talk for future report <br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> hhalpin to contact eran to talk, also about LRDD. <br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> hhalpin to send e-mail to id commons saying we endorse their principles, have a link to us <br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> Sören to propose addition to the template for user stories for conditions <br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> tpa to look for similar use cases list to expand ours <br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>[PENDING]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> danbri follow up re whether to use survey tool at w3c or elsewhere <br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>[DONE]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> hhalpin to create draft use-case document in W3C cvs <br />
<strong>[DONE]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> tpa to W3C-style "edit" user stories <br />
&nbsp;<br />

[End of minutes] <br>

<hr>

<address>
  Minutes formatted by David Booth's 
  <a href="http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm">scribe.perl</a> version 1.133 (<a href="http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/">CVS log</a>)<br>
  $Date: 2009/07/07 12:37:45 $ 
</address>
</div>
</body>
</html>