Preface.html 4.21 KB
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
  <head>
    <meta name="generator" content=
    "HTML Tidy for Mac OS X (vers 31 October 2006 - Apple Inc. build 13), see www.w3.org" />
    <title>
      Preface - World Wide Web Design Issues
    </title>
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="di.css" type="text/css" />
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <hr />
    <p>
      <a href="Overview.html">Design Issues</a>
    </p>
    <h1>
      Preface
    </h1>
    <h2>
      Architectural and philosophical points
    </h2>
    <blockquote>
      <i>These statements of architectural principle explain the
      thinking behind the specifications. These are personal notes
      by Tim Berners-Lee: they are not endorsed by W3C. They are
      aimed at the technical community, to explain reasons, provide
      a framework to provide consistency for for future
      developments, and avoid repetition of discussions once
      resolved.</i>
    </blockquote>
    <p>
      I have found that, having started this set of notes in 1990
      in the (for me) novel medium of hypertext, it has been
      difficult to tear free of it: my attempts to lend hierachical
      or serial order have been doomed to failure. Further, as
      ideas and these web pages have evolved, it has been important
      for me to be able to reorganize my thoughts, grab a new leaf,
      shake the tree and regard it as the root. So the reader needs
      to be aware of this, that each page may be an attempt to put
      across a given concept serially, but if you are looking for
      an order of concepts and subconcepts, you have as much hope
      as you would with words in the dictionary. I can sympathise
      with Ted Nelson whose <cite>Litterary Machines</cite> has "a
      Chapter Zero, several Chapters One, one Chapter Two, and
      several Chapters Three", not to mention with Ludwig
      Wittgenstein whose <cite>Philosophical Investigations</cite>
      have only paragraph numbers for structure.
    </p>
    <p>
      The notes are in a constant state of flux, sometimes minute
      by minute, sometimes decade by decade. Their status varies -
      some have typos and spelling errors, and represent thoughts
      half expressed, wheras others described resolved issues which
      have become fundamental architectural decisions in the
      conceptual infrastructure of the Web. Again, something in me
      resists the urge to draw a line and move things from here
      into a "done deals" space. I try to represent accurately the
      status of a given page in the section above the rule at the
      top. Definitive documents, reviewed by W3C members and
      others, you will find elsewhere.
    </p>
    <p>
      Neither have I found it easy to restrict myself to separated
      technical or philosophical arguments and somehow this I feel
      is also important, the sharpening happening, after all, where
      the knife meets the stone.
    </p>
    <p>
      I did draw a line between the really old ones whose dates I
      couldn't necessarily even find, and which were too out of
      date to find themselves linked into any current discussion.
      Hence the brown archival section on the contents page, and
      the brown archived notes it points to. These are really only
      available for completeness of archival, and not suggested
      reading. The other remarks here do not apply to them.
    </p>
    <p>
      For all its (or because of its) lax flexibility, I have
      personally found this space a useful one. I have used it to
      place opionions and explanations which I have needed to
      express, and have found it useful to be able to express them
      later to others. But also I have found it a personally useful
      excercie to review the state of order and disporder from time
      to time, part of the intuitive process of making a new step.
      But that is all personal use and, and for the hestiations I
      have just outlined, I have never felt that the whole
      collection has been worthy of recommeding as reading as a
      work in itself.
    </p>
    <p>
      Tim BL October 1998
    </p>
    <hr />
    <p>
      <small>$Id: Preface.html,v 1.5 1999/01/06 18:12:59 timbl Exp
      $</small>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>