13-swxg-minutes.html
41.1 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html lang='en' xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">
<head>
<meta name="generator" content=
"HTML Tidy for Linux/x86 (vers 12 April 2005), see www.w3.org" />
<title>Social Web Incubator Group -- 13 May 2009</title>
<link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET" href=
"http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/base.css" />
<link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET" href=
"http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/public.css" />
<link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET" href=
"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/minutes-style.css" />
<meta content="Social Web Incubator Group" name="Title" />
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=
"Content-Type" />
</head>
<body>
<p><a href="http://www.w3.org/"><img src=
"http://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_home" alt="W3C" border="0" height=
"48" width="72" /></a></p>
>
<h1>Social Web Incubator Group</h1>
<h2>13 May 2009</h2>
<p><a href=
'http://www.w3.org/mid/b3be92a00905121430x5f524560rfaa58328694779d3@mail.gmail.com'>
Agenda</a></p>
<p>See also: <a href="http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-irc">IRC
log</a></p>
<h2><a name="attendees" id="attendees">Attendees</a></h2>
<div class="intro">
<dl>
<dt>Present</dt>
<dd>AdamB, tinkster, AlexPassant, FabGandon, wonsuk, karl,
dom, oshani, jsalvachua, cperey, +0797094aaaa, petef,
+03539149aabb, mischat, +39.011.228.aacc, pchampin, uldis,
+49.899.5.aaee, raphael, Julian, +39.011.228.aaff, danbri,
hhalpin, MacTed, +1.510.931.aagg, Hakan, yuk</dd>
<dt>Regrets</dt>
<dd>Ronald, BenG, JeffS, PhilA, AlexKorth</dd>
<dt>Chair</dt>
<dd>DKA</dd>
<dt>Scribe</dt>
<dd>Toby</dd>
</dl>
</div>
<h2>Contents</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="#agenda">Topics</a></li>
<li><a href="#ActionSummary">Summary of Action Items</a></li>
</ul>
<hr />
<div class="meeting">
<p class='phone'> </p>
<p class='phone'>7994</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>jsalvachua</cite>> Hello, to
all</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>karl</cite>> <a href=
"http://w3csocialweb.tumblr.com/">Last Week in Social Web
Incubator Group</a></p>
<p class='phone'>Does it just involve typing what's spoken to
IRC?</p>
<p class='phone'>If so, I can do that - I can type pretty
quickly.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>dom</cite>> ScribeNick:
tinkster</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>dom</cite>> Scribe: Toby</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>karl</cite>> cheers for
tinkster</p>
<p class='phone'>danbri and hhalpin details, so I'm
scribing.</p>
<p class='phone'>Harry's agenda had a typo for IRC channel.
This is the correct one.</p>
<p class='phone'>No roll call. Anyone new?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>AlexPassant</cite>> I was there
only on IRC last week</p>
<p class='phone'>Alex Passant - <a href=
"http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-social-web-talk/2009May/0020.html">
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-social-web-talk/2009May/0020.html</a></p>
<p class='phone'>DERI Galway.</p>
<p class='phone'>Interested in social/semantic stuff.</p>
<p class='phone'>Do we approve minutes from last meeting?</p>
<p class='phone'>Any objections?</p>
<p class='phone'>We'll generally assume minutes approved unless
we hear otherwise.</p>
<p class='phone'>First, we'll hear about Christine's taskforce
proposal.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>dom</cite>> <a href=
"http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-socialweb/2009May/0051.html">
Christine's TF proposal</a></p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>dom</cite>> <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/05/06-swxg-minutes.html">Last week
meeting minutes</a></p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Christine:</cite> task forces concept
not just my idea. Helped to write it and adopted formula from
workshops.</p>
<p class='phone'>People at workshops and after expressed
interest in specific topics.</p>
<p class='phone'>Task forces illustrate depth and bredth of
topics.</p>
<p class='phone'>Christine doesn't percieve "mobile" as
separate topic. Is relevant to all task forces.</p>
<p class='phone'>This is why she doesn't propose such a task
force.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>DKA</cite>> +1 to not splitting
mobile off.</p>
<p class='phone'>Christine's task force proposal is not the
only way this could be split up.</p>
<p class='phone'>Distributed and privacy/trust seem to have a
lot of people interested.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>jsalvachua</cite>> +1 not splitting
mobile</p>
<p class='phone'>Julian from Vodaphone has joined us and will
be introducing himself.</p>
<p class='phone'>Vodaphone R&D, research initiatives
group.</p>
<p class='phone'>Interested in context and standardising that
here.</p>
<p class='phone'>DKA notes task forces have been successful in
Mobile Web Best Practices.</p>
<p class='phone'>MWBP task forces have sometimes had own calls,
own face to faces.</p>
<p class='phone'>DKA speaks about definition of task
forces.</p>
<p class='phone'>Key feature is that they have a lead.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> task force has
leader and people/participants!</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>raphael</cite>> +1 to not split
mobile too</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> we need to have a
critical number of experts</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Dom:</cite> leader + charter. People can
decide whether to join.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> make sure task force
scope is well defined</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> hi</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> sorry late, trying
join</p>
<p class='phone'>Needs more than 1 participant.</p>
<p class='phone'>For every task force we want to launch, there
is an overhead - identify leader, etc.</p>
<p class='phone'>e.g. a mobile web task force was set up for an
open source implementation. Made sense to split it off, have
own calls, have face to faces to work on code.</p>
<p class='phone'>Different deliverables from main working
group.</p>
<p class='phone'>Any software development would certainly make
sense as a task force.</p>
<p class='phone'>Let's identify one or two task forces to split
off and then phase in others if/when needed.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> ..ooOO( 7 task
forces, vs 7 email threads...? )</p>
<p class='phone'>What are people's priorities for task
forces?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> It is not required
that all task forces begin at the start of the incubator's
activity. There may be delays either due to lack of appropriate
leader or contributors, dependencies or lack of time on behalf
of the incubator group's members.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>AdamB</cite>> how should the task
forces map back to the XG charter?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Christine:</cite> sorry for echo on
line. Agrees that some can be spun off later - sometimes
deirable when there are dependencies.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>AdamB</cite>> or should i ask, do
they need to?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Christine:</cite> important to have a
higher level "Landscape" task force. How does everything look
big picture?<br />
... I want to be invoolved in that one.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> yes, I would like to
lead that</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> agrees landscape tf makes
sense.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> looks like he is</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> I am online.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> both are on line</p>
<p class='phone'>Thanks.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> i'm not getting
audio here</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> agrees on having task
forces.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> may i make my point
by irc please?: for now re "task forces", let's start by seeing
them as email threads ...</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>jsalvachua</cite>> +1 for task
forces to start and focus the work</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> I'd say 2 or 3.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> agree that they need
to be clarified based on interests</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> if we get > 10
messages in 1 of these threads, and more than 3 participants in
that thread, then let's call it a Task Force ...</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> Scoping for task forces need
more quantification. Don't want to split off 7 immediately. 2
is a good place to start.<br />
... all Christines listed areas are good places, but don't
necessarily need all of them to spin off separately.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> notes that we also
had a poll on task for projected participation in past...</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> let me find that
URI</p>
<p class='phone'>Landscape and Business areas - mergeable?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Christine:</cite> there is overlap, but
Landscape intended to look at technical aspects, and look for
gaps.<br />
... metrics is muddy.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Zakim</cite>> karl, you wanted to
ask about Landscape Task force future?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Karl:</cite> Landscape seems to be about
surveying. Incubator is 1 year (maybe two if we're lucky).</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> Maybe one thing we
can say, if we wanted to start 2 or 3 task forces in order to
get some work done, which 2 or 3 would be best?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Karl:</cite> Should we have a continuing
forum for discussing developments after the XG is finished?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Christine:</cite> Landscape is a "living
framework". On a wiki?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>karl</cite>> <a href=
"http://delicious.com/search?p=socialweb">http://delicious.com/search?p=socialweb</a>
? does it answer the needs or what is needed?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Christine:</cite> capture the state of
the art and then "colour on top of it to make it more
rich".</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> I guess my question
with Landscape is that it's more or less what the entire XG is
supposed to be doing...</p>
<p class='phone'>DKA? agrees with christine about living
document.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>mischat</cite>> agreed hhalpin, the
landscape sounds like what the final report will be</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Adam:</cite> start with charter - this
might reduce number of task forces.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> I think that the
landscape task force will contribute to the final
deliverable</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> yes, section in the
XG report</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> Landscape/Business/other?
task forces will probably contribute chapters to end
deliverables.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> It is central to the
XG's "view" on the world and its own work</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>karl</cite>> Is there a need for a
task force for Landscape when there are already plenty of sites
covering social web?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/99999/SocialWebXGCharter/results">
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/99999/SocialWebXGCharter/results</a></p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> Results of Task
Force Questionnaire from March.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Karl:</cite> plenty of websites out
there about the social web. Some business info, some
development. Do we need yet another website for delivering
information?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> General results
from questionnaire had "business" and "landscape" merge, and
with "Distributed Architecture" and "Interoperability" merging
as well, with context and user-experience kept separate.</p>
<p class='phone'>What should be on the wiki? How do we select
info to include?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>mischat</cite>> hehe</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>Christine:</cite> for people in the
group to decide what's included. She's not married to any
particular structure. Should be technical and lead to us
identifying areas that need more attention.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> On the results of
questionnaire, we had most popular task forces being 1)
interoperability/distributed architecture 2) privacy and 3)
user experience and 4) contextual data</p>
<p class='phone'>Landscape can help us figure out if new
technologies are needed, or maybe that no new technologies
needed.</p>
<p class='phone'>As most people seem to be interested in
privacy, interop, etc, then perhaps not enough people
interested in Landscape to do that work?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>DKA</cite>> PROPOSED RESOLUTION:
the group will create a task force focusing on "landscape and
business." Christine Perey to lead task force and edit task
force report.</p>
<p class='phone'>Landscape would look at obstacles to growth of
social web.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> The whole point of
the XG is future W3C standardization.</p>
<p class='phone'>What work is already being done which could be
standardised?</p>
<p class='phone'>40/50 people telecons are not going to be
productive, so task forces are almost a requirement.</p>
<p class='phone'>How should it be dividided is the real
question?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> 24 ppl on phone?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>karl</cite>> the deliverables of
Task Forces could drive the themes</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>bblfish</cite>> oops sorry for
coming in late</p>
<p class='phone'>The landscape stuff should be what the
*entire* XG is looking at. It's other topics that want task
forces.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>petef</cite>> hhalpin speaking
now</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> task forces
should/would be focused on topics</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>DKA</cite>> PROPOSED RESOLUTION:
the group will three task forces: privacy; user experience and
context.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> Privacy seems to be
very popular</p>
<p class='phone'>Task forces for privacy, interop, another
thing (anyone catch it?)</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>DKA</cite>> PROPOSED RESOLUTION:
the group will three task forces: privacy; user experience and
context. Landscape will be a deliverable of the main working
group.</p>
<p class='phone'>Ah, DKA has.</p>
<p class='phone'>From this structure, the landscape should
organically emerge.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>mischat</cite>> distributed
architecture task force seems important too .</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> what about
distributed/decentralized architectures?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>petef</cite>> DKA< there was a
fourth too: distributed architectures and data portability</p>
<p class='phone'>DKA has proposed a resolution to task forces.
He agrees with hhalpin that Landscape is key.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> Privacy, User
Experience, Context, Distributed Architecture.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> That's 4. Perhaps
too many.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>jsalvachua</cite>> i think that
interoperability and distributed may be interesting
(merged)</p>
<p class='phone'>Landscape still needs a leader even if it's
being worked on by whole XG.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> We could do a WBS
Questionnaire.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> not too many, if
there are sufficient people</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> Landscape leader
will be editor of final report deliverble.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> no need to delay
getting a poll now</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>AlexPassant</cite>> +1 for merging
distributed architecture and interoperability</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> Privacy, User
Experience, Context, Distributed Architecture.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>karl</cite>> <a href=
"http://delicious.com/search?p=social%20web%20privacy">Social
Web Privacy on delicious</a></p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>jsalvachua</cite>> +q</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> Landscape=final
deliverable?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> CPerey, yes.</p>
<p class='phone'>I can't scribe and put myself on the
queue.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> Miguel Martin wanted
to do the distributed architecture</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>jsa:</cite> distributed architecture</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> Distributed
Architecture + Portability.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> it is of high
interest</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> That's popular.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>jsalvachua</cite>> Joaquin
salvachua :)</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> Joaquin.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>karl</cite>> small goals are
achievable.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>uldis</cite>> if landscape /
overview is a deliverable of the main group, will there be
anyone focusing on it? that is, if we don't mention such a
group (for landscape), who will work on it?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>jsalvachua:</cite> reintroduces himself.
Interested in running distrib arch and portability.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> Landscape will be
worked on by the editors.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>petef</cite>> I would be interested
in working on that too, with jsvalchua</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>jsalvachua</cite>> perfect petef
:)</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>mischat</cite>> no</p>
<p class='phone'>Privacy, User Exp, Context - leaders?...
anyone?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> So, in general,
each of the task force will contribute use-cases and add
technical details to technical document.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> Then towards end of
XG lifespan, we synthesize this work collectively.</p>
<p class='phone'>Does is make sense to combine them. Mischa
says no.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> Into landscape.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> Which is given by
the final report.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> hi Claudio!</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>claudio:</cite> interested in context,
but what is the scope?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>claudio:</cite> talking to Philip Oscar
(?) to understand whether Telecom Italia (?) work might fit in
here or another group.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> The mission of this
task force is to document those principles which the task force
members believe to be the appropriate use & approaches to
control of abuse of contextual data in social networks. One of
the deliverables of this task force is a report mapping the
current uses of context in social networking. A best practices
guide could also be envisioned,</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> location,
proximity</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>DKA:</cite> christine's notes mention
context = location, proximity, more.</p>
<p class='phone'>What goes into context information? Mapping
them to existing standards/vocabs.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> For example of
context, look at this:</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/dcontology/">http://www.w3.org/TR/dcontology/</a></p>
<p class='phone'>Wide scope of context - abuse of context info
- is this better handled by privacy task force?</p>
<p class='phone'>claudio is mostly interested in context as in
device capabilities.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> +1</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> maybe think
geolocation API, how does that work with an API like OpenSocial
or Social Data?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>mischat:</cite> people can hear him.</p>
<p class='phone'>He's from Garlik.</p>
<p class='phone'>Looked into life logging and working out
autobiographies from web activity.</p>
<p class='phone'>AlexPassant, I knew it was some kind of silly
spelling.</p>
<p class='phone'>;-)</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>DKA</cite>> +1</p>
<p class='phone'>Interesting = Analysis of photographs to
figure out what people were doing at the time.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>raphael</cite>> Misha refers to
work from Mor Naarman, <a href=
"http://infolab.stanford.edu/~mor/">http://infolab.stanford.edu/~mor/</a>
previously at Yahoo Berkeley now in New York</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> The real key is
that likely all task-forces work will have to merge.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> The entire point of
the task forces is to get small enough groups to allow
productive telecons to produce text.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> for the
deliverables and to have detailed technical conversations as
well.</p>
<p class='phone'>Can mischa lead a task force or edit a
document about this? No, he's still working on PhD and that
takes much of his time. But he'll add his thoughts about
context to the wiki.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> ...but context also
includes more</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>DKA</cite>> PROPOSED RESOLUTION:
the group will four task forces: privacy; user experience;
distributed architecture and context. Landscape will be a
deliverable of the main working group.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>claudio:</cite> Still thinks this is a
little too general. Probably not interested in leading context
task force. Context might have to be something which is
launched further along, not initially. Wait until needs are
clarified?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>mischat</cite>> context related
project in EU : <a href=
"http://livingknowledge-project.eu/">http://livingknowledge-project.eu/</a></p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> We can always
launch a contextual task force later as needed, or do it in
larger group telecons.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>DKA</cite>> ACTION mischat to write
some thoughts into the wiki on context, channeling Mor
Naaman.</p><a name="action01" id="action01"></a>
<p class='irc'><<cite>dom</cite>>
<strong>ACTION:</strong> mischat to write some thoughts into
the wiki on context, channeling Mor Naaman [recorded in
<a href="http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action01">
http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action01</a>]</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>DKA</cite>> PROPOSED RESOLUTION:
the group will four task forces: privacy; user experience;
distributed architecture. Landscape and context documents will
be deliverables of the main working group.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>mischat</cite>> dom that dom :)</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>mischat</cite>> got that dom</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>me:</cite> Could context be an area of
user experience? Providing different experiences based on
context?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> i only see 3
there</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>petef</cite>> DKA s/four/three
?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hakan:</cite> we should have a look at
what's already been done in presence area. Can we use what's
already there?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> "the group will
initiate THREE task forces: privacy; user experience;
distributed architecture."</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hakan:</cite> will add links and info to
wiki about this topic.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> Let's check to see
if we have a lead for privacy and user-experience.</p>
<p class='phone'>How can I add actions?</p><a name="action02"
id="action02"></a>
<p class='irc'><<cite>DKA</cite>>
<strong>ACTION:</strong> hakan to provide some info into the
wiki on existing work on context. [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action02">http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action02</a>]</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>me:</cite> am interested in privacy, but
not enough to lead.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> this (presence work
in the past) is landscape!! thank you!!</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> +1 on 2 or 3 for
starters being fine</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>karl</cite>> It would be good to
have a precise description of what are the deliverables of each
task force.</p>
<p class='phone'>Who wants to lead privacy; and user
experience?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> Volunteers for
privacy task force?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>bblfish</cite>> I will be looking
at Access Control</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>bblfish</cite>> Is that
privacy?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>DKA</cite>> ach hh</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> precise definitions
of task forces are for the participants</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> The key is not just
to list technologies, but to inspect them.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>DKA</cite>> +1 to mischa's
comments</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> To determine what
are compatible with current user and business practice, both on
a social level and technical level.</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>mischat:</cite> XRIs - are people
interested in these? Garlik can provide insight on what sort of
personal info is out there on the web. But what do people
want?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> However, note that
usage of XRIs *may* prove to be sticking point if W3C wanted to
push standards that use XRIs due to RF issues.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> This task force will
explore how specific approaches to ensuring user and user data
privacy and trust can improve the security and reduce risks of
users. This task force is also responsible for the development
of best practices recommendations on privacy in social
networks.</p>
<p class='phone'>"Best Practices for Privacy in Social
Networks" could be an outcome. What are people's perceptions of
privacy?</p>
<p class='phone'>Can mischat provide information about privacy
on Wiki?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>mischat</cite>> yes i can add
to</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>mischat</cite>> wiki</p><a name=
"action03" id="action03"></a>
<p class='irc'><<cite>DKA</cite>>
<strong>ACTION:</strong> mischat to provide some data on
privacy to the wiki. [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action03">http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action03</a>]</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> 6 min to close of
meeting</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> Do we still not
have a Privacy Task Force Leader?</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> Don't we have a privacy
leader??</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>Zakim</cite>> karl, you wanted to
tell about privacy scope</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>karl:</cite> would be happy to lead on
privacy if the scope is very focussed.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> Maybe give Karl an
action to clarify the privacy task force :)</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>karl:</cite> user stories might be a way
to focus on what is needed.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> +1 to user
stories</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>mischat</cite>> +1 to user
stories</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> User stories then
become part of use-case document...</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> how is user stories
= or not to use cases?</p><a name="action04" id="action04"></a>
<p class='irc'><<cite>DKA</cite>>
<strong>ACTION:</strong> Karl to provide some user stories
regarding privacy. [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action04">http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action04</a>]</p>
<p class='phone'>DKA supports the idea of user stories as a way
of exploring these topics - equally works for context.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>pchampin</cite>> same question as
cperey</p>
<p class='phone'>Would someone want to provide context user
stories?</p><a name="action05" id="action05"></a>
<p class='irc'><<cite>DKA</cite>>
<strong>ACTION:</strong> Julian to provide some user stories
regarding context. [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action05">http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action05</a>]</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> Cperey, pchampin:
user stories, once mature, will be part of use-case
document.</p>
<p class='phone'>julian could.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> if someone has a
template, i could probably contrib a tv-related
story</p><a name="action06" id="action06"></a>
<p class='irc'><<cite>DKA</cite>>
<strong>ACTION:</strong> Hakan to provide some user stories
regarding context. [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action06">http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action06</a>]</p>
<p class='phone'>Someone else (who?) could.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> (actions are
good!)</p>
<p class='phone'>DKA = actions equal progress!</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> yes</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>karl</cite>> user stories will help
to refine task forces I guess</p>
<p class='phone'>Will Christine edit the landscape document?
Christine says yes.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> I would be happy to
shape landscape wiki area</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> Note that landscape
wiki = (probably equals) = editor of final report for W3C
:)</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> Oshani, do you want
an action on that context + privacy?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>oshani</cite>> sure</p><a name=
"action07" id="action07"></a>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>>
<strong>ACTION:</strong> Oshani to provide use-cases for
privacy and context on wiki [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action07">http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action07</a>]</p>
<p class='phone'>Editing a document vs contributing to wiki.
Wiki is good to start with, but we need to ultimately provide
documents.</p>
<p class='phone'>Item #3 on agenda.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> danbri: "Can you
hear me? Is this thing on?"</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>mischat</cite>> no we cant hear
you</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> pls continue my
actions</p>
<p class='phone'>Can't hear danbri.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> we should continue
this discussion abou how to work onj the next call</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> noting that harry
made a start, and i tweaked his page ...</p>
<p class='phone'>About time to finish off...</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/InvitedGuests">
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/InvitedGuests</a></p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> re wiki, i am
thinking something a bit like <a href=
"http://esw.w3.org/topic/ScheduledTopicChat">http://esw.w3.org/topic/ScheduledTopicChat</a>
in spirit but less IRC-ish</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>hhalpin:</cite> Was a slow start because
of wiki editing issues, but here's a list of people we could
invite here.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> hhalpin, i edited
that a bit earlier</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> confirm that wiki
editing works now :)</p>
<p class='phone'><cite>me:</cite> I really want to look at OMB
spec.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>jsalvachua</cite>> hhalpin, my w3c
user does not works for the wiki</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> re list of
people/projects, i'd rather have a list of topics and problems
...</p>
<p class='phone'>Do we have consensus on having invited
guests?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>petef</cite>> +1 for biweekly guest
telecons</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> ... which is what i
consider my action to address</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> I would like to
suggest that we have the guest telecons to be separately</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>mischat</cite>> jsalvachua: when
was the last time you checked</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>jsalvachua</cite>> 1 hour ago</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> not: "we'd like you
to come and talk to us. " but "we'd like you to come and talk
about x"</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>DKA</cite>> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: we
should have guest speaker telecons - guests to be organized by
chairs.</p>
<p class='phone'>Guest telecons will be separate from main
telecon. Will be bi-weekly.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>DKA</cite>> +1</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> where my action is
specifying some Xs and a template for X</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> but a task force
telecon could happen in the same week as guest speaker
telecon</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> Maybe test for
consensus or ask questions?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>mischat</cite>> can we add to list
of Guest speakers ?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> mischat: yes,
that's why the guest speakers are on the wiki</p>
<p class='phone'>DKA(?): Main objection was that it might be a
distraction, and information is already available in other
ways, but that shouldn't stop us.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> I would like there
to be an effort to bring in Facebook as an invited guest</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>melvster</cite>> list of speakers
id add: Kevin Marks (opensocial etc.) , Brad Fitzpatrick
(Google social graph API)</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>DKA</cite>> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: we
should have optional guest speaker telecons - guests to be
organized by chairs.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>DKA</cite>> +1 to the proposal.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>petef</cite>> although there are
already enough speakers on the wiki to last a year</p>
<p class='phone'>It's always possible to skip particular guest
telecons if you're not interested.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> lots of them will be
too busy, for sure</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> I have to sign
off</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> we don't know who,
so good to have a nice list</p>
<p class='phone'>Some people listed on wiki might not be
available.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>cperey</cite>> bye</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> Any objections?</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> if we make it very
problem-focussed we could get folk who might otherwise be
unable to justify the time</p>
<p class='phone'>PROPOSED RESOLUTION: we should have optional
guest speaker telecons - guests to be organized by chairs.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>petef</cite>> +1</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> Danbri: we can
tweak the kind and type of inviation...</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>mib_4d0quw9x</cite>> +1 (Hakan)</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>jsalvachua</cite>> +1</p>
<p class='phone'><strong class='resolution'>RESOLUTION: we
should have optional guest speaker telecons - guests to be
organized by chairs.</strong></p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> :)</p><a name=
"action08" id="action08"></a>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>>
<strong>ACTION:</strong> hhalpin and danbri to invite guest
speakers and investigate their schedule [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action08">http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action08</a>]</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> i pinged chris saad
earlier re dataportability too</p>
<p class='phone'>Evan P of OMB interested in contributing.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> i can bring it up on
next week's dataportability call too</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> karl: big news
would definitely be important</p>
<p class='phone'>Next week: pick up discussion on task
forces.</p>
<p class='phone'>Bye everyone!</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>jsalvachua</cite>> karl, looks
interesting</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>mischat</cite>> bye all</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>hhalpin</cite>> bye everyone, only
a few minutes over!</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>petef</cite>> thanks all, bye</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>mib_4d0quw9x</cite>> bye</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>danbri</cite>> cheers, sorry to be
partially conneted</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>jsalvachua</cite>> bye</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>AdamB</cite>> bye</p>
<p class='phone'>Is there anything I need to do as scribe to
finish off?</p>
<p class='phone'>thanks</p>
<p class='phone'>no problem.</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>yuk</cite>> i don't miss me in the
attendee</p>
<p class='irc'><<cite>yuk</cite>> thank you</p>
</div>
<h2><a name="ActionSummary" id="ActionSummary">Summary of Action
Items</a></h2><!-- Action Items -->
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> hakan to provide
some info into the wiki on existing work on context. [recorded in
<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action02">http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action02</a>]<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> Hakan to provide
some user stories regarding context. [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action06">http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action06</a>]<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> hhalpin and
danbri to invite guest speakers and investigate their schedule
[recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action08">http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action08</a>]<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> Julian to provide
some user stories regarding context. [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action05">http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action05</a>]<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> Karl to provide
some user stories regarding privacy. [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action04">http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action04</a>]<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> mischat to
provide some data on privacy and context ( channeling Mor Naaman) to the wiki. [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action03">http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action03</a>]<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> Oshani to provide
use-cases for privacy and context on wiki [recorded in <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action07">http://www.w3.org/2009/05/13-swxg-minutes.html#action07</a>]<br />
<br />
[End of minutes]<br />
<hr />
<address>
Minutes formatted by David Booth's <a href=
"http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm">
scribe.perl</a> version 1.135 (<a href=
"http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/">CVS log</a>)<br />
$Date: 2009/05/13 19:18:20 $
</address>
</body>
</html>