REC-wsdl20-primer-20070626.1
255 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
1438
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1451
1452
1453
1454
1455
1456
1457
1458
1459
1460
1461
1462
1463
1464
1465
1466
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482
1483
1484
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496
1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
1510
1511
1512
1513
1514
1515
1516
1517
1518
1519
1520
1521
1522
1523
1524
1525
1526
1527
1528
1529
1530
1531
1532
1533
1534
1535
1536
1537
1538
1539
1540
1541
1542
1543
1544
1545
1546
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1560
1561
1562
1563
1564
1565
1566
1567
1568
1569
1570
1571
1572
1573
1574
1575
1576
1577
1578
1579
1580
1581
1582
1583
1584
1585
1586
1587
1588
1589
1590
1591
1592
1593
1594
1595
1596
1597
1598
1599
1600
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
1620
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659
1660
1661
1662
1663
1664
1665
1666
1667
1668
1669
1670
1671
1672
1673
1674
1675
1676
1677
1678
1679
1680
1681
1682
1683
1684
1685
1686
1687
1688
1689
1690
1691
1692
1693
1694
1695
1696
1697
1698
1699
1700
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
1708
1709
1710
1711
1712
1713
1714
1715
1716
1717
1718
1719
1720
1721
1722
1723
1724
1725
1726
1727
1728
1729
1730
1731
1732
1733
1734
1735
1736
1737
1738
1739
1740
1741
1742
1743
1744
1745
1746
1747
1748
1749
1750
1751
1752
1753
1754
1755
1756
1757
1758
1759
1760
1761
1762
1763
1764
1765
1766
1767
1768
1769
1770
1771
1772
1773
1774
1775
1776
1777
1778
1779
1780
1781
1782
1783
1784
1785
1786
1787
1788
1789
1790
1791
1792
1793
1794
1795
1796
1797
1798
1799
1800
1801
1802
1803
1804
1805
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812
1813
1814
1815
1816
1817
1818
1819
1820
1821
1822
1823
1824
1825
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
1836
1837
1838
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
1860
1861
1862
1863
1864
1865
1866
1867
1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
1873
1874
1875
1876
1877
1878
1879
1880
1881
1882
1883
1884
1885
1886
1887
1888
1889
1890
1891
1892
1893
1894
1895
1896
1897
1898
1899
1900
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
1908
1909
1910
1911
1912
1913
1914
1915
1916
1917
1918
1919
1920
1921
1922
1923
1924
1925
1926
1927
1928
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2051
2052
2053
2054
2055
2056
2057
2058
2059
2060
2061
2062
2063
2064
2065
2066
2067
2068
2069
2070
2071
2072
2073
2074
2075
2076
2077
2078
2079
2080
2081
2082
2083
2084
2085
2086
2087
2088
2089
2090
2091
2092
2093
2094
2095
2096
2097
2098
2099
2100
2101
2102
2103
2104
2105
2106
2107
2108
2109
2110
2111
2112
2113
2114
2115
2116
2117
2118
2119
2120
2121
2122
2123
2124
2125
2126
2127
2128
2129
2130
2131
2132
2133
2134
2135
2136
2137
2138
2139
2140
2141
2142
2143
2144
2145
2146
2147
2148
2149
2150
2151
2152
2153
2154
2155
2156
2157
2158
2159
2160
2161
2162
2163
2164
2165
2166
2167
2168
2169
2170
2171
2172
2173
2174
2175
2176
2177
2178
2179
2180
2181
2182
2183
2184
2185
2186
2187
2188
2189
2190
2191
2192
2193
2194
2195
2196
2197
2198
2199
2200
2201
2202
2203
2204
2205
2206
2207
2208
2209
2210
2211
2212
2213
2214
2215
2216
2217
2218
2219
2220
2221
2222
2223
2224
2225
2226
2227
2228
2229
2230
2231
2232
2233
2234
2235
2236
2237
2238
2239
2240
2241
2242
2243
2244
2245
2246
2247
2248
2249
2250
2251
2252
2253
2254
2255
2256
2257
2258
2259
2260
2261
2262
2263
2264
2265
2266
2267
2268
2269
2270
2271
2272
2273
2274
2275
2276
2277
2278
2279
2280
2281
2282
2283
2284
2285
2286
2287
2288
2289
2290
2291
2292
2293
2294
2295
2296
2297
2298
2299
2300
2301
2302
2303
2304
2305
2306
2307
2308
2309
2310
2311
2312
2313
2314
2315
2316
2317
2318
2319
2320
2321
2322
2323
2324
2325
2326
2327
2328
2329
2330
2331
2332
2333
2334
2335
2336
2337
2338
2339
2340
2341
2342
2343
2344
2345
2346
2347
2348
2349
2350
2351
2352
2353
2354
2355
2356
2357
2358
2359
2360
2361
2362
2363
2364
2365
2366
2367
2368
2369
2370
2371
2372
2373
2374
2375
2376
2377
2378
2379
2380
2381
2382
2383
2384
2385
2386
2387
2388
2389
2390
2391
2392
2393
2394
2395
2396
2397
2398
2399
2400
2401
2402
2403
2404
2405
2406
2407
2408
2409
2410
2411
2412
2413
2414
2415
2416
2417
2418
2419
2420
2421
2422
2423
2424
2425
2426
2427
2428
2429
2430
2431
2432
2433
2434
2435
2436
2437
2438
2439
2440
2441
2442
2443
2444
2445
2446
2447
2448
2449
2450
2451
2452
2453
2454
2455
2456
2457
2458
2459
2460
2461
2462
2463
2464
2465
2466
2467
2468
2469
2470
2471
2472
2473
2474
2475
2476
2477
2478
2479
2480
2481
2482
2483
2484
2485
2486
2487
2488
2489
2490
2491
2492
2493
2494
2495
2496
2497
2498
2499
2500
2501
2502
2503
2504
2505
2506
2507
2508
2509
2510
2511
2512
2513
2514
2515
2516
2517
2518
2519
2520
2521
2522
2523
2524
2525
2526
2527
2528
2529
2530
2531
2532
2533
2534
2535
2536
2537
2538
2539
2540
2541
2542
2543
2544
2545
2546
2547
2548
2549
2550
2551
2552
2553
2554
2555
2556
2557
2558
2559
2560
2561
2562
2563
2564
2565
2566
2567
2568
2569
2570
2571
2572
2573
2574
2575
2576
2577
2578
2579
2580
2581
2582
2583
2584
2585
2586
2587
2588
2589
2590
2591
2592
2593
2594
2595
2596
2597
2598
2599
2600
2601
2602
2603
2604
2605
2606
2607
2608
2609
2610
2611
2612
2613
2614
2615
2616
2617
2618
2619
2620
2621
2622
2623
2624
2625
2626
2627
2628
2629
2630
2631
2632
2633
2634
2635
2636
2637
2638
2639
2640
2641
2642
2643
2644
2645
2646
2647
2648
2649
2650
2651
2652
2653
2654
2655
2656
2657
2658
2659
2660
2661
2662
2663
2664
2665
2666
2667
2668
2669
2670
2671
2672
2673
2674
2675
2676
2677
2678
2679
2680
2681
2682
2683
2684
2685
2686
2687
2688
2689
2690
2691
2692
2693
2694
2695
2696
2697
2698
2699
2700
2701
2702
2703
2704
2705
2706
2707
2708
2709
2710
2711
2712
2713
2714
2715
2716
2717
2718
2719
2720
2721
2722
2723
2724
2725
2726
2727
2728
2729
2730
2731
2732
2733
2734
2735
2736
2737
2738
2739
2740
2741
2742
2743
2744
2745
2746
2747
2748
2749
2750
2751
2752
2753
2754
2755
2756
2757
2758
2759
2760
2761
2762
2763
2764
2765
2766
2767
2768
2769
2770
2771
2772
2773
2774
2775
2776
2777
2778
2779
2780
2781
2782
2783
2784
2785
2786
2787
2788
2789
2790
2791
2792
2793
2794
2795
2796
2797
2798
2799
2800
2801
2802
2803
2804
2805
2806
2807
2808
2809
2810
2811
2812
2813
2814
2815
2816
2817
2818
2819
2820
2821
2822
2823
2824
2825
2826
2827
2828
2829
2830
2831
2832
2833
2834
2835
2836
2837
2838
2839
2840
2841
2842
2843
2844
2845
2846
2847
2848
2849
2850
2851
2852
2853
2854
2855
2856
2857
2858
2859
2860
2861
2862
2863
2864
2865
2866
2867
2868
2869
2870
2871
2872
2873
2874
2875
2876
2877
2878
2879
2880
2881
2882
2883
2884
2885
2886
2887
2888
2889
2890
2891
2892
2893
2894
2895
2896
2897
2898
2899
2900
2901
2902
2903
2904
2905
2906
2907
2908
2909
2910
2911
2912
2913
2914
2915
2916
2917
2918
2919
2920
2921
2922
2923
2924
2925
2926
2927
2928
2929
2930
2931
2932
2933
2934
2935
2936
2937
2938
2939
2940
2941
2942
2943
2944
2945
2946
2947
2948
2949
2950
2951
2952
2953
2954
2955
2956
2957
2958
2959
2960
2961
2962
2963
2964
2965
2966
2967
2968
2969
2970
2971
2972
2973
2974
2975
2976
2977
2978
2979
2980
2981
2982
2983
2984
2985
2986
2987
2988
2989
2990
2991
2992
2993
2994
2995
2996
2997
2998
2999
3000
3001
3002
3003
3004
3005
3006
3007
3008
3009
3010
3011
3012
3013
3014
3015
3016
3017
3018
3019
3020
3021
3022
3023
3024
3025
3026
3027
3028
3029
3030
3031
3032
3033
3034
3035
3036
3037
3038
3039
3040
3041
3042
3043
3044
3045
3046
3047
3048
3049
3050
3051
3052
3053
3054
3055
3056
3057
3058
3059
3060
3061
3062
3063
3064
3065
3066
3067
3068
3069
3070
3071
3072
3073
3074
3075
3076
3077
3078
3079
3080
3081
3082
3083
3084
3085
3086
3087
3088
3089
3090
3091
3092
3093
3094
3095
3096
3097
3098
3099
3100
3101
3102
3103
3104
3105
3106
3107
3108
3109
3110
3111
3112
3113
3114
3115
3116
3117
3118
3119
3120
3121
3122
3123
3124
3125
3126
3127
3128
3129
3130
3131
3132
3133
3134
3135
3136
3137
3138
3139
3140
3141
3142
3143
3144
3145
3146
3147
3148
3149
3150
3151
3152
3153
3154
3155
3156
3157
3158
3159
3160
3161
3162
3163
3164
3165
3166
3167
3168
3169
3170
3171
3172
3173
3174
3175
3176
3177
3178
3179
3180
3181
3182
3183
3184
3185
3186
3187
3188
3189
3190
3191
3192
3193
3194
3195
3196
3197
3198
3199
3200
3201
3202
3203
3204
3205
3206
3207
3208
3209
3210
3211
3212
3213
3214
3215
3216
3217
3218
3219
3220
3221
3222
3223
3224
3225
3226
3227
3228
3229
3230
3231
3232
3233
3234
3235
3236
3237
3238
3239
3240
3241
3242
3243
3244
3245
3246
3247
3248
3249
3250
3251
3252
3253
3254
3255
3256
3257
3258
3259
3260
3261
3262
3263
3264
3265
3266
3267
3268
3269
3270
3271
3272
3273
3274
3275
3276
3277
3278
3279
3280
3281
3282
3283
3284
3285
3286
3287
3288
3289
3290
3291
3292
3293
3294
3295
3296
3297
3298
3299
3300
3301
3302
3303
3304
3305
3306
3307
3308
3309
3310
3311
3312
3313
3314
3315
3316
3317
3318
3319
3320
3321
3322
3323
3324
3325
3326
3327
3328
3329
3330
3331
3332
3333
3334
3335
3336
3337
3338
3339
3340
3341
3342
3343
3344
3345
3346
3347
3348
3349
3350
3351
3352
3353
3354
3355
3356
3357
3358
3359
3360
3361
3362
3363
3364
3365
3366
3367
3368
3369
3370
3371
3372
3373
3374
3375
3376
3377
3378
3379
3380
3381
3382
3383
3384
3385
3386
3387
3388
3389
3390
3391
3392
3393
3394
3395
3396
3397
3398
3399
3400
3401
3402
3403
3404
3405
3406
3407
3408
3409
3410
3411
3412
3413
3414
3415
3416
3417
3418
3419
3420
3421
3422
3423
3424
3425
3426
3427
3428
3429
3430
3431
3432
3433
3434
3435
3436
3437
3438
3439
3440
3441
3442
3443
3444
3445
3446
3447
3448
3449
3450
3451
3452
3453
3454
3455
3456
3457
3458
3459
3460
3461
3462
3463
3464
3465
3466
3467
3468
3469
3470
3471
3472
3473
3474
3475
3476
3477
3478
3479
3480
3481
3482
3483
3484
3485
3486
3487
3488
3489
3490
3491
3492
3493
3494
3495
3496
3497
3498
3499
3500
3501
3502
3503
3504
3505
3506
3507
3508
3509
3510
3511
3512
3513
3514
3515
3516
3517
3518
3519
3520
3521
3522
3523
3524
3525
3526
3527
3528
3529
3530
3531
3532
3533
3534
3535
3536
3537
3538
3539
3540
3541
3542
3543
3544
3545
3546
3547
3548
3549
3550
3551
3552
3553
3554
3555
3556
3557
3558
3559
3560
3561
3562
3563
3564
3565
3566
3567
3568
3569
3570
3571
3572
3573
3574
3575
3576
3577
3578
3579
3580
3581
3582
3583
3584
3585
3586
3587
3588
3589
3590
3591
3592
3593
3594
3595
3596
3597
3598
3599
3600
3601
3602
3603
3604
3605
3606
3607
3608
3609
3610
3611
3612
3613
3614
3615
3616
3617
3618
3619
3620
3621
3622
3623
3624
3625
3626
3627
3628
3629
3630
3631
3632
3633
3634
3635
3636
3637
3638
3639
3640
3641
3642
3643
3644
3645
3646
3647
3648
3649
3650
3651
3652
3653
3654
3655
3656
3657
3658
3659
3660
3661
3662
3663
3664
3665
3666
3667
3668
3669
3670
3671
3672
3673
3674
3675
3676
3677
3678
3679
3680
3681
3682
3683
3684
3685
3686
3687
3688
3689
3690
3691
3692
3693
3694
3695
3696
3697
3698
3699
3700
3701
3702
3703
3704
3705
3706
3707
3708
3709
3710
3711
3712
3713
3714
3715
3716
3717
3718
3719
3720
3721
3722
3723
3724
3725
3726
3727
3728
3729
3730
3731
3732
3733
3734
3735
3736
3737
3738
3739
3740
3741
3742
3743
3744
3745
3746
3747
3748
3749
3750
3751
3752
3753
3754
3755
3756
3757
3758
3759
3760
3761
3762
3763
3764
3765
3766
3767
3768
3769
3770
3771
3772
3773
3774
3775
3776
3777
3778
3779
3780
3781
3782
3783
3784
3785
3786
3787
3788
3789
3790
3791
3792
3793
3794
3795
3796
3797
3798
3799
3800
3801
3802
3803
3804
3805
3806
3807
3808
3809
3810
3811
3812
3813
3814
3815
3816
3817
3818
3819
3820
3821
3822
3823
3824
3825
3826
3827
3828
3829
3830
3831
3832
3833
3834
3835
3836
3837
3838
3839
3840
3841
3842
3843
3844
3845
3846
3847
3848
3849
3850
3851
3852
3853
3854
3855
3856
3857
3858
3859
3860
3861
3862
3863
3864
3865
3866
3867
3868
3869
3870
3871
3872
3873
3874
3875
3876
3877
3878
3879
3880
3881
3882
3883
3884
3885
3886
3887
3888
3889
3890
3891
3892
3893
3894
3895
3896
3897
3898
3899
3900
3901
3902
3903
3904
3905
3906
3907
3908
3909
3910
3911
3912
3913
3914
3915
3916
3917
3918
3919
3920
3921
3922
3923
3924
3925
3926
3927
3928
3929
3930
3931
3932
3933
3934
3935
3936
3937
3938
3939
3940
3941
3942
3943
3944
3945
3946
3947
3948
3949
3950
3951
3952
3953
3954
3955
3956
3957
3958
3959
3960
3961
3962
3963
3964
3965
3966
3967
3968
3969
3970
3971
3972
3973
3974
3975
3976
3977
3978
3979
3980
3981
3982
3983
3984
3985
3986
3987
3988
3989
3990
3991
3992
3993
3994
3995
3996
3997
3998
3999
4000
4001
4002
4003
4004
4005
4006
4007
4008
4009
4010
4011
4012
4013
4014
4015
4016
4017
4018
4019
4020
4021
4022
4023
4024
4025
4026
4027
4028
4029
4030
4031
4032
4033
4034
4035
4036
4037
4038
4039
4040
4041
4042
4043
4044
4045
4046
4047
4048
4049
4050
4051
4052
4053
4054
4055
4056
4057
4058
4059
4060
4061
4062
4063
4064
4065
4066
4067
4068
4069
4070
4071
4072
4073
4074
4075
4076
4077
4078
4079
4080
4081
4082
4083
4084
4085
4086
4087
4088
4089
4090
4091
4092
4093
4094
4095
4096
4097
4098
4099
4100
4101
4102
4103
4104
4105
4106
4107
4108
4109
4110
4111
4112
4113
4114
4115
4116
4117
4118
4119
4120
4121
4122
4123
4124
4125
4126
4127
4128
4129
4130
4131
4132
4133
4134
4135
4136
4137
4138
4139
4140
4141
4142
4143
4144
4145
4146
4147
4148
4149
4150
4151
4152
4153
4154
4155
4156
4157
4158
4159
4160
4161
4162
4163
4164
4165
4166
4167
4168
4169
4170
4171
4172
4173
4174
4175
4176
4177
4178
4179
4180
4181
4182
4183
4184
4185
4186
4187
4188
4189
4190
4191
4192
4193
4194
4195
4196
4197
4198
4199
4200
4201
4202
4203
4204
4205
4206
4207
4208
4209
4210
4211
4212
4213
4214
4215
4216
4217
4218
4219
4220
4221
4222
4223
4224
4225
4226
4227
4228
4229
4230
4231
4232
4233
4234
4235
4236
4237
4238
4239
4240
4241
4242
4243
4244
4245
4246
4247
4248
4249
4250
4251
4252
4253
4254
4255
4256
4257
4258
4259
4260
4261
4262
4263
4264
4265
4266
4267
4268
4269
4270
4271
4272
4273
4274
4275
4276
4277
4278
4279
4280
4281
4282
4283
4284
4285
4286
4287
4288
4289
4290
4291
4292
4293
4294
4295
4296
4297
4298
4299
4300
4301
4302
4303
4304
4305
4306
4307
4308
4309
4310
4311
4312
4313
4314
4315
4316
4317
4318
4319
4320
4321
4322
4323
4324
4325
4326
4327
4328
4329
4330
4331
4332
4333
4334
4335
4336
4337
4338
4339
4340
4341
4342
4343
4344
4345
4346
4347
4348
4349
4350
4351
4352
4353
4354
4355
4356
4357
4358
4359
4360
4361
4362
4363
4364
4365
4366
4367
4368
4369
4370
4371
4372
4373
4374
4375
4376
4377
4378
4379
4380
4381
4382
4383
4384
4385
4386
4387
4388
4389
4390
4391
4392
4393
4394
4395
4396
4397
4398
4399
4400
4401
4402
4403
4404
4405
4406
4407
4408
4409
4410
4411
4412
4413
4414
4415
4416
4417
4418
4419
4420
4421
4422
4423
4424
4425
4426
4427
4428
4429
4430
4431
4432
4433
4434
4435
4436
4437
4438
4439
4440
4441
4442
4443
4444
4445
4446
4447
4448
4449
4450
4451
4452
4453
4454
4455
4456
4457
4458
4459
4460
4461
4462
4463
4464
4465
4466
4467
4468
4469
4470
4471
4472
4473
4474
4475
4476
4477
4478
4479
4480
4481
4482
4483
4484
4485
4486
4487
4488
4489
4490
4491
4492
4493
4494
4495
4496
4497
4498
4499
4500
4501
4502
4503
4504
4505
4506
4507
4508
4509
4510
4511
4512
4513
4514
4515
4516
4517
4518
4519
4520
4521
4522
4523
4524
4525
4526
4527
4528
4529
4530
4531
4532
4533
4534
4535
4536
4537
4538
4539
4540
4541
4542
4543
4544
4545
4546
4547
4548
4549
4550
4551
4552
4553
4554
4555
4556
4557
4558
4559
4560
4561
4562
4563
4564
4565
4566
4567
4568
4569
4570
4571
4572
4573
4574
4575
4576
4577
4578
4579
4580
4581
4582
4583
4584
4585
4586
4587
4588
4589
4590
4591
4592
4593
4594
4595
4596
4597
4598
4599
4600
4601
4602
4603
4604
4605
4606
4607
4608
4609
4610
4611
4612
4613
4614
4615
4616
4617
4618
4619
4620
4621
4622
4623
4624
4625
4626
4627
4628
4629
4630
4631
4632
4633
4634
4635
4636
4637
4638
4639
4640
4641
4642
4643
4644
4645
4646
4647
4648
4649
4650
4651
4652
4653
4654
4655
4656
4657
4658
4659
4660
4661
4662
4663
4664
4665
4666
4667
4668
4669
4670
4671
4672
4673
4674
4675
4676
4677
4678
4679
4680
4681
4682
4683
4684
4685
4686
4687
4688
4689
4690
4691
4692
4693
4694
4695
4696
4697
4698
4699
4700
4701
4702
4703
4704
4705
4706
4707
4708
4709
4710
4711
4712
4713
4714
4715
4716
4717
4718
4719
4720
4721
4722
4723
4724
4725
4726
4727
4728
4729
4730
4731
4732
4733
4734
4735
4736
4737
4738
4739
4740
4741
4742
4743
4744
4745
4746
4747
4748
4749
4750
4751
4752
4753
4754
4755
4756
4757
4758
4759
4760
4761
4762
4763
4764
4765
4766
4767
4768
4769
4770
4771
4772
4773
4774
4775
4776
4777
4778
4779
4780
4781
4782
4783
4784
4785
4786
4787
4788
4789
4790
4791
4792
4793
4794
4795
4796
4797
4798
4799
4800
4801
4802
4803
4804
4805
4806
4807
4808
4809
4810
4811
4812
4813
4814
4815
4816
4817
4818
4819
4820
4821
4822
4823
4824
4825
4826
4827
4828
4829
4830
4831
4832
4833
4834
4835
4836
4837
4838
4839
4840
4841
4842
4843
4844
4845
4846
4847
4848
4849
4850
4851
4852
4853
4854
4855
4856
4857
4858
4859
4860
4861
4862
4863
4864
4865
4866
4867
4868
4869
4870
4871
4872
4873
4874
4875
4876
4877
4878
4879
4880
4881
4882
4883
4884
4885
4886
4887
4888
4889
4890
4891
4892
4893
4894
4895
4896
4897
4898
4899
4900
4901
4902
4903
4904
4905
4906
4907
4908
4909
4910
4911
4912
4913
4914
4915
4916
4917
4918
4919
4920
4921
4922
4923
4924
4925
4926
4927
4928
4929
4930
4931
4932
4933
4934
4935
4936
4937
4938
4939
4940
4941
4942
4943
4944
4945
4946
4947
4948
4949
4950
4951
4952
4953
4954
4955
4956
4957
4958
4959
4960
4961
4962
4963
4964
4965
4966
4967
4968
4969
4970
4971
4972
4973
4974
4975
4976
4977
4978
4979
4980
4981
4982
4983
4984
4985
4986
4987
4988
4989
4990
4991
4992
4993
4994
4995
4996
4997
4998
4999
5000
5001
5002
5003
5004
5005
5006
5007
5008
5009
5010
5011
5012
5013
5014
5015
5016
5017
5018
5019
5020
5021
5022
5023
5024
5025
5026
5027
5028
5029
5030
5031
5032
5033
5034
5035
5036
5037
5038
5039
5040
5041
5042
5043
5044
5045
5046
5047
5048
5049
5050
5051
5052
5053
5054
5055
5056
5057
5058
5059
5060
5061
5062
5063
5064
5065
5066
5067
5068
5069
5070
5071
5072
5073
5074
5075
5076
5077
5078
5079
5080
5081
5082
5083
5084
5085
5086
5087
5088
5089
5090
5091
5092
5093
5094
5095
5096
5097
5098
5099
5100
5101
5102
5103
5104
5105
5106
5107
5108
5109
5110
5111
5112
5113
5114
5115
5116
5117
5118
5119
5120
5121
5122
5123
5124
5125
5126
5127
5128
5129
5130
5131
5132
5133
5134
5135
5136
5137
5138
5139
5140
5141
5142
5143
5144
5145
5146
5147
5148
5149
5150
5151
5152
5153
5154
5155
5156
5157
5158
5159
5160
5161
5162
5163
5164
5165
5166
5167
5168
5169
5170
5171
5172
5173
5174
5175
5176
5177
5178
5179
5180
5181
5182
5183
5184
5185
5186
5187
5188
5189
5190
5191
5192
5193
5194
5195
5196
5197
5198
5199
5200
5201
5202
5203
5204
5205
5206
5207
5208
5209
5210
5211
5212
5213
5214
5215
5216
5217
5218
5219
5220
5221
5222
5223
5224
5225
5226
5227
5228
5229
5230
5231
5232
5233
5234
5235
5236
5237
5238
5239
5240
5241
5242
5243
5244
5245
5246
5247
5248
5249
5250
5251
5252
5253
5254
5255
5256
5257
5258
5259
5260
5261
5262
5263
5264
5265
5266
5267
5268
5269
5270
5271
5272
5273
5274
5275
5276
5277
5278
5279
5280
5281
5282
5283
5284
5285
5286
5287
5288
5289
5290
5291
5292
5293
5294
5295
5296
5297
5298
5299
5300
5301
5302
5303
5304
5305
5306
5307
5308
5309
5310
5311
5312
5313
5314
5315
5316
5317
5318
5319
5320
5321
5322
5323
5324
5325
5326
5327
5328
5329
5330
5331
5332
5333
5334
5335
5336
5337
5338
5339
5340
5341
5342
5343
5344
5345
5346
5347
5348
5349
5350
5351
5352
5353
5354
5355
5356
5357
5358
5359
5360
5361
5362
5363
5364
5365
5366
5367
5368
5369
5370
5371
5372
5373
5374
5375
5376
5377
5378
5379
5380
5381
5382
5383
5384
5385
5386
5387
5388
5389
5390
5391
5392
5393
5394
5395
5396
5397
5398
5399
5400
5401
5402
5403
5404
5405
5406
5407
5408
5409
5410
5411
5412
5413
5414
5415
5416
5417
5418
5419
5420
5421
5422
5423
5424
5425
5426
5427
5428
5429
5430
5431
5432
5433
5434
5435
5436
5437
5438
5439
5440
5441
5442
5443
5444
5445
5446
5447
5448
5449
5450
5451
5452
5453
5454
5455
5456
5457
5458
5459
5460
5461
5462
5463
5464
5465
5466
5467
5468
5469
5470
5471
5472
5473
5474
5475
5476
5477
5478
5479
5480
5481
5482
5483
5484
5485
5486
5487
5488
5489
5490
5491
5492
5493
5494
5495
5496
5497
5498
5499
5500
5501
5502
5503
5504
5505
5506
5507
5508
5509
5510
5511
5512
5513
5514
5515
5516
5517
5518
5519
5520
5521
5522
5523
5524
5525
5526
5527
5528
5529
5530
5531
5532
5533
5534
5535
5536
5537
5538
5539
5540
5541
5542
5543
5544
5545
5546
5547
5548
5549
5550
5551
5552
5553
5554
5555
5556
5557
5558
5559
5560
5561
5562
5563
5564
5565
5566
5567
5568
5569
5570
5571
5572
5573
5574
5575
5576
5577
5578
5579
5580
5581
5582
5583
5584
5585
5586
5587
5588
5589
5590
5591
5592
5593
5594
5595
5596
5597
5598
5599
5600
5601
5602
5603
5604
5605
5606
5607
5608
5609
5610
5611
5612
5613
5614
5615
5616
5617
5618
5619
5620
5621
5622
5623
5624
5625
5626
5627
5628
5629
5630
5631
5632
5633
5634
5635
5636
5637
5638
5639
5640
5641
5642
5643
5644
5645
5646
5647
5648
5649
5650
5651
5652
5653
5654
5655
5656
5657
5658
5659
5660
5661
5662
5663
5664
5665
5666
5667
5668
5669
5670
5671
5672
5673
5674
5675
5676
5677
5678
5679
5680
5681
5682
5683
5684
5685
5686
5687
5688
5689
5690
5691
5692
5693
5694
5695
5696
5697
5698
5699
5700
5701
5702
5703
5704
5705
5706
5707
5708
5709
5710
5711
5712
5713
5714
5715
5716
5717
5718
5719
5720
5721
5722
5723
5724
5725
5726
5727
5728
5729
5730
5731
5732
5733
5734
5735
5736
5737
5738
5739
5740
5741
5742
5743
5744
5745
5746
5747
5748
5749
5750
5751
5752
5753
5754
5755
5756
5757
5758
5759
5760
5761
5762
5763
5764
5765
5766
5767
5768
5769
5770
5771
5772
5773
5774
5775
5776
5777
5778
5779
5780
5781
5782
5783
5784
5785
5786
5787
5788
5789
5790
5791
5792
5793
5794
5795
5796
5797
5798
5799
5800
5801
5802
5803
5804
5805
5806
5807
5808
5809
5810
5811
5812
5813
5814
5815
5816
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content=
"text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 0:
Primer</title>
<style type="text/css" xml:space="preserve">
/*<![CDATA[*/
code { font-family: monospace; }
div.constraint,
div.issue,
div.note,
div.notice { margin-left: 2em; }
ol.enumar { list-style-type: decimal; }
ol.enumla { list-style-type: lower-alpha; }
ol.enumlr { list-style-type: lower-roman; }
ol.enumua { list-style-type: upper-alpha; }
ol.enumur { list-style-type: upper-roman; }
dt.label { display: run-in; }
li, p { margin-top: 0.3em;
margin-bottom: 0.3em; }
.diff-chg { background-color: yellow; }
.diff-del { background-color: red; text-decoration: line-through;}
.diff-add { background-color: lime; }
table { empty-cells: show; }
table caption {
font-weight: normal;
font-style: italic;
text-align: left;
margin-bottom: .5em;
}
div.issue {
color: red;
}
.rfc2119 {
font-variant: small-caps;
}
div.exampleInner pre { margin-left: 1em;
margin-top: 0em; margin-bottom: 0em}
div.exampleOuter {border: 4px double gray;
margin: 0em; padding: 0em}
div.exampleInner { background-color: #d5dee3;
border-top-width: 4px;
border-top-style: double;
border-top-color: #d3d3d3;
border-bottom-width: 4px;
border-bottom-style: double;
border-bottom-color: #d3d3d3;
padding: 4px; margin: 0em }
div.exampleWrapper { margin: 4px }
div.exampleHeader { font-weight: bold;
margin: 4px}
th { color: #000000; background-color: #CCCC99; }
span.test-assertion { background-color: #FFC0CB; }
span.test-assertion-tr:hover { background-color: #FFC0CB; }
/*]]>*/
</style>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href=
"http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-REC.css" />
</head>
<body>
<div class="head">
<p><a href="http://www.w3.org/"><img src=
"http://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_home" alt="W3C" height="48" width=
"72" /></a></p>
<h1><a name="title" id="title"></a>Web Services Description
Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 0: Primer</h1>
<h2><a name="w3c-doctype" id="w3c-doctype"></a>W3C Recommendation
26 June 2007</h2>
<dl>
<dt>This version:</dt>
<dd><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-primer-20070626">http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-primer-20070626</a></dd>
<dt>Latest version:</dt>
<dd><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-primer">http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-primer</a></dd>
<dt>Previous version:</dt>
<dd><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/PR-wsdl20-primer-20070523">http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/PR-wsdl20-primer-20070523</a></dd>
<dt>Editors:</dt>
<dd>David Booth, W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard</dd>
<dd>Canyang Kevin Liu, SAP Labs</dd>
</dl>
<p>Please refer to the <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2007/06/wsdl20-errata.html"><strong>errata</strong></a>
for this document, which may include some normative
corrections.</p>
<p>This document is also available in these non-normative formats:
<a href="wsdl20-primer.pdf">PDF</a>, <a href=
"wsdl20-primer.ps">PostScript</a>, <a href=
"wsdl20-primer.xml">XML</a>, and <a href=
"wsdl20-primer.txt">plain text</a>.</p>
<p>See also <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2003/03/Translations/byTechnology?technology=wsdl20-primer">
<strong>translations</strong></a>.</p>
<p class="copyright"><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Copyright">Copyright</a> © 2007 <a href="http://www.w3.org/"><acronym title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C</acronym></a><sup>®</sup>
(<a href="http://www.csail.mit.edu/"><acronym title=
"Massachusetts Institute of Technology">MIT</acronym></a>, <a href=
"http://www.ercim.org/"><acronym title=
"European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics">ERCIM</acronym></a>,
<a href="http://www.keio.ac.jp/">Keio</a>), All Rights Reserved.
W3C <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Legal_Disclaimer">liability</a>,
<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#W3C_Trademarks">trademark</a>
and <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-documents">document
use</a> rules apply.</p>
</div>
<hr />
<div>
<h2><a name="abstract" id="abstract"></a>Abstract</h2>
<p>This document is a companion to the WSDL 2.0 specification
(<em>Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 1:
Core Language</em> [<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART1">WSDL 2.0
Core</a></cite>], <em>Web Services Description Language (WSDL)
Version 2.0 Part 2: Adjuncts</em> [<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART2">WSDL
2.0 Adjuncts</a></cite>]). It is intended for readers who wish to
have an easier, less technical introduction to the main features of
the language.</p>
<p>This primer is only intended to be a starting point toward use
of WSDL 2.0, and hence does not describe every feature of the
language. Users are expected to consult the WSDL 2.0 specification
if they wish to make use of more sophisticated features or
techniques.</p>
<p>Finally, this primer is <em>non-normative</em>. Any specific
questions of what WSDL 2.0 requires or forbids should be referred
to the WSDL 2.0 specification.</p>
</div>
<div>
<h2><a name="status" id="status"></a>Status of this Document</h2>
<p><em>This section describes the status of this document at the
time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this
document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest
revision of this technical report can be found in the <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/">W3C technical reports index</a> at
http://www.w3.org/TR/.</em></p>
<p>This is the <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#RecsW3C">W3C
Recommendation</a> of Web Services Description Language (WSDL)
Version 2.0 Part 0: Primer for review by W3C Members and other
interested parties. It has been produced by the <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/">Web Services Description Working
Group</a>, which is part of the <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/Activity">W3C Web Services
Activity</a>.</p>
<p>Please send comments about this document to the public <a href=
"mailto:public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org">public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org</a>
mailing list (<a href=
"http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/">public
archive</a>).</p>
<p>The Working Group released a test suite along with an <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/impl-report/">implementation
report</a>. A <a href="wsdl20-primer-diff.html">diff-marked version
against the previous version of this document</a> is available.</p>
<p>This document has been reviewed by W3C Members, by software
developers, and by other W3C groups and interested parties, and is
endorsed by the Director as a W3C Recommendation. It is a stable
document and may be used as reference material or cited from
another document. W3C's role in making the Recommendation is to
draw attention to the specification and to promote its widespread
deployment. This enhances the functionality and interoperability of
the Web.</p>
<p>This document is governed by the <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-patent-practice-20020124">24
January 2002 CPP</a> as amended by the <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2004/02/05-pp-transition">W3C Patent Policy
Transition Procedure</a>. W3C maintains a <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/04/24-IPR-statements.html">public
list of any patent disclosures</a> made in connection with the
deliverables of the group; that page also includes instructions for
disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a
patent which the individual believes contains <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#def-essential">
Essential Claim(s)</a> must disclose the information in accordance
with <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Disclosure">
section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy</a>.</p>
</div>
<div class="toc">
<h2><a name="contents" id="contents"></a>Table of Contents</h2>
<p class="toc">1. <a href="#Introduction">Introduction</a>
<br />
    1.1 <a href=
"#Prerequisites">Prerequisites</a>
<br />
    1.2 <a href="#PrimerStructure">Structure of
this Primer</a>
<br />
    1.3 <a href="#UseIRI">Use of URIs and
IRIs</a>
<br />
    1.4 <a href="#notation">Notational
Conventions</a>
<br />
2. <a href="#basics">WSDL 2.0 Basics</a>
<br />
    2.1 <a href="#basic-example">Getting
Started: The GreatH Hotel Example</a>
<br />
        2.1.1 <a href=
"#basics-greath-scenario">Example Scenario: The GreatH Hotel
Reservation Service</a>
<br />
        2.1.2 <a href=
"#basics-getting-started">Defining a WSDL 2.0 Target Namespace</a>
<br />
            2.1.2.1
<a href="#example-empty-shell-explanation">Explanation of
Example</a>
<br />
        2.1.3 <a href=
"#basics-types">Defining Message Types</a>
<br />
            2.1.3.1
<a href="#example-initial-types-explanation">Explanation of
Example</a>
<br />
        2.1.4 <a href=
"#basics-interface">Defining an Interface</a>
<br />
            2.1.4.1
<a href="#example-initial-interface-explanation">Explanation of
Example</a>
<br />
        2.1.5 <a href=
"#basics-binding">Defining a Binding</a>
<br />
            2.1.5.1
<a href="#example-initial-binding-explanation">Explanation of
Example</a>
<br />
        2.1.6 <a href=
"#basics-service">Defining a Service</a>
<br />
            2.1.6.1
<a href="#example-initial-service-explanation">Explanation of
Example</a>
<br />
        2.1.7 <a href=
"#basics-documentation">Documenting the Service</a>
<br />
            2.1.7.1
<a href="#example-initial-documentation-explanation">Explanation of
Example</a>
<br />
    2.2 <a href="#wsdl-xml-representation">WSDL
2.0 Infoset, Schema and Component Model</a>
<br />
        2.2.1 <a href=
"#wsdl-infoset-diagram">WSDL 2.0 Infoset</a>
<br />
        2.2.2 <a href=
"#wsdl-schema">WSDL 2.0 Schema</a>
<br />
            2.2.2.1
<a href="#element-order">WSDL 2.0 Element Ordering</a>
<br />
        2.2.3 <a href=
"#component-model">WSDL 2.0 Component Model</a>
<br />
            2.2.3.1
<a href="#import-component">WSDL 2.0 Import and Include</a>
<br />
    2.3 <a href="#more-types">More on Message
Types</a>
<br />
        2.3.1 <a href=
"#more-types-schema-inline">Inlining XML Schema</a>
<br />
        2.3.2 <a href=
"#more-types-schema-import">Importing XML Schema</a>
<br />
        2.3.3 <a href=
"#more-types-import-include-summary">Summary of Import and Include
Mechanisms</a>
<br />
    2.4 <a href="#more-interfaces">More on
Interfaces</a>
<br />
        2.4.1 <a href=
"#more-interfaces-interfaces">Interface Syntax</a>
<br />
        2.4.2 <a href=
"#more-interfaces-inheritance">Interface Inheritance</a>
<br />
        2.4.3 <a href=
"#more-interfaces-faults">Interface Faults</a>
<br />
        2.4.4 <a href=
"#more-interfaces-operations">Interface Operations</a>
<br />
            2.4.4.1
<a href="#more-interfaces-op-attr">Operation Attributes</a>
<br />
            2.4.4.2
<a href="#id2295836">Operation Message References</a>
<br />
                2.4.4.2.1
<a href="#id2295901">The messageLabel Attribute</a>
<br />
                2.4.4.2.2
<a href="#id2295952">The element Attribute</a>
<br />
                2.4.4.2.3
<a href="#id2296126">Multiple infault or outfault Elements</a>
<br />
            2.4.4.3
<a href="#more-interfaces-meps">Understanding Message Exchange
Patterns (MEPs)</a>
<br />
    2.5 <a href="#more-bindings">More on
Bindings</a>
<br />
        2.5.1 <a href=
"#more-bindings-wsdl">Syntax Summary for Bindings</a>
<br />
        2.5.2 <a href=
"#more-bindings-reusable">Reusable Bindings</a>
<br />
        2.5.3 <a href=
"#more-bindings-faults">Binding Faults</a>
<br />
        2.5.4 <a href=
"#bindingOperations">Binding Operations</a>
<br />
        2.5.5 <a href=
"#more-bindings-soap">The SOAP Binding Extension</a>
<br />
            2.5.5.1
<a href="#more-bindings-soap-example-explanation">Explanation of
Example</a>
<br />
        2.5.6 <a href=
"#more-bindings-http">The HTTP Binding Extension</a>
<br />
            2.5.6.1
<a href="#id2297429">Explanation of Example</a>
<br />
        2.5.7 <a href=
"#adv-get-vs-post">HTTP GET Versus POST: Which to Use?</a>
<br />
3. <a href="#advanced-topic_ii">Advanced Topics I: Importing
Mechanisms</a>
<br />
    3.1 <a href=
"#adv-import-and-authoring">Importing WSDL</a>
<br />
    3.2 <a href=
"#adv-multiple-inline-schemas">Importing Schemas</a>
<br />
        3.2.1 <a href=
"#id2298427">Schemas in Imported Documents</a>
<br />
        3.2.2 <a href=
"#id2298802">Multiple Inline Schemas in One Document</a>
<br />
        3.2.3 <a href=
"#adv-schema-location">The schemaLocation Attribute</a>
<br />
            3.2.3.1
<a href="#id2299144">Using the id Attribute to Identify Inline
Schemas</a>
<br />
4. <a href="#advanced-topic_iii">Advanced Topics II: Extensibility
and Predefined Extensions</a>
<br />
    4.1 <a href=
"#adv-extensibility">Extensibility</a>
<br />
        4.1.1 <a href=
"#adv-optional-versus-required">Optional Versus Required
Extensions</a>
<br />
    4.2 <a href="#adv-MEP">Defining New
MEPs</a>
<br />
        4.2.1 <a href=
"#challenge-confirm">Confirmed Challenge</a>
<br />
    4.3 <a href="#adv-RPCstyle">RPC Style</a>
<br />
5. <a href="#advanced-topic_iv">Advanced Topics III:
Miscellaneous</a>
<br />
    5.1 <a href=
"#adv-message-dispatch">Enabling Easy Message Dispatch</a>
<br />
    5.2 <a href="#adv-versioning">Web Service
Versioning</a>
<br />
        5.2.1 <a href=
"#adv-versioning-compatible-evolution">Compatible Evolution</a>
<br />
        5.2.2 <a href=
"#adv-versioning-big-bang">Big Bang</a>
<br />
        5.2.3 <a href=
"#ad-versioing-migration">Evolving a Service</a>
<br />
        5.2.4 <a href=
"#adv-versioning-combined">Combined Approaches</a>
<br />
        5.2.5 <a href=
"#adv-versioning-examples">Examples of Versioning and Extending a
Service</a>
<br />
            5.2.5.1
<a href="#id2301152">Additional Optional Elements Added in
Content</a>
<br />
            5.2.5.2
<a href="#id2301217">Additional Optional Elements Added to a
Header</a>
<br />
            5.2.5.3
<a href="#id2301271">Additional Mandatory Elements in Content</a>
<br />
            5.2.5.4
<a href="#id2301354">Additional Optional Operation Added to
Interface</a>
<br />
            5.2.5.5
<a href="#id2301385">Additional Mandatory Operation Added to
Interface</a>
<br />
            5.2.5.6
<a href="#id2301454">Indicating Incompatibility by Changing the
Endpoint URI</a>
<br />
            5.2.5.7
<a href="#id2301490">Indicating Incompatibility by Changing the
SOAP Action</a>
<br />
            5.2.5.8
<a href="#id2301552">Indicating Incompatibility by Changing the
Element Content</a>
<br />
    5.3 <a href=
"#adv-service-references">Describing Web Service Messages That
Refer to Other Web Services</a>
<br />
        5.3.1 <a href=
"#reservationDetails">The Reservation Details Web Service</a>
<br />
        5.3.2 <a href=
"#reservationList">The Reservation List Web Service</a>
<br />
        5.3.3 <a href=
"#reservationDetails_HTTP">Reservation Details Web Service Using
HTTP Transfer</a>
<br />
        5.3.4 <a href=
"#reservationList_HTTP_GET">Reservation List Web Service Using HTTP
GET</a>
<br />
    5.4 <a href=
"#adv-multiple-docs-describing-same-service">Multiple Interfaces
for the Same Service</a>
<br />
    5.5 <a href="#adv-rdf-mapping">Mapping to
RDF and Semantic Web</a>
<br />
        5.5.1 <a href=
"#adv-rdf-rep-wsdl">RDF Representation of WSDL 2.0</a>
<br />
    5.6 <a href="#adv-notes-on-uris">Notes on
URIs</a>
<br />
        5.6.1 <a href=
"#adv-namespaces-and-schema-locations">XML Namespaces and Schema
Locations</a>
<br />
        5.6.2 <a href=
"#adv-relative-uris">Relative URIs</a>
<br />
        5.6.3 <a href=
"#adv-generating-uris">Generating Temporary URIs</a>
<br />
6. <a href="#References">References</a>
<br />
    6.1 <a href=
"#Normative-References">Normative References</a>
<br />
    6.2 <a href=
"#Informative-References">Informative References</a>
<br /></p>
<h3><a name="appendices" id="appendices"></a>Appendix</h3>
<p class="toc">A. <a href="#acknowledgments">Acknowledgements</a>
(Non-Normative)
<br /></p>
</div>
<hr />
<div class="body">
<div class="div1">
<h2><a name="Introduction" id="Introduction"></a>1.
Introduction</h2>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="Prerequisites" id="Prerequisites"></a>1.1
Prerequisites</h3>
<p>This primer assumes that the reader has the following
prerequisite knowledge:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>familiarity with XML (<em>Extensible Markup Language (XML)
1.0</em> [<cite><a href="#XML10">XML 1.0</a></cite>], <em>XML
Information Set</em> [<cite><a href="#XMLInfoSet">XML Information
Set</a></cite>]) and XML Namespaces (<em>Namespaces in XML</em>
[<cite><a href="#XMLNS">XML Namespaces</a></cite>]);</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>some familiarity with XML Schema (<em>XML Schema Part 1:
Structures</em> [<cite><a href="#XMLSchemaP1">XML Schema
Structures</a></cite>] <em>XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes</em>
[<cite><a href="#XMLSchemaP2">XML Schema
Datatypes</a></cite>]);</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>familiarity with basic Web services concepts such as Web
service, client, and the purpose and function of a Web service
description. (For an explanation of basic Web services concepts,
see <em>Web Services Architecture</em> [<cite><a href="#wsarch">WS
Architecture</a></cite>] <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-ws-arch-20040211/#whatis">Section
1.4</a> and <em>Web Services Glossary</em> [<cite><a href=
"#WSAGLOSS">WS Glossary</a></cite>] <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-ws-gloss-20040211/">glossary</a>.
However, note the <em>Web Services Architecture</em> document uses
the slightly more precise terms "<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-ws-gloss-20040211/#requesteragent">requester
agent</a>" and "<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-ws-gloss-20040211/#provideragent">provider
agent</a>" instead of the terms "client" and "Web service" used in
this primer.)</p>
</li>
</ul>
No previous experience with WSDL is assumed.</div>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="PrimerStructure" id="PrimerStructure"></a>1.2
Structure of this Primer</h3>
<p>Section 2 starts with a hypothetical use case involving a hotel
reservation service. It proceeds step-by-step through the
development of a simple example WSDL 2.0 document that describes
this service:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>The <code>types</code> element describes the kinds of messages
that the service will send and receive.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The <code>interface</code> element describes <em>what</em>
abstract functionality the Web service provides.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The <code>binding</code> element describes <em>how</em> to
access the service.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The <code>service</code> element describes <em>where</em> to
access the service.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>After presenting the example, it moves on to introduce the WSDL
2.0 infoset, schema, and component model. Then it provides more
detailed coverage on defining message types, interfaces, bindings,
and services.</p>
<p>Section 3 explains the WSDL 2.0 importing mechanisms in great
details.</p>
<p>Section 4 talks about WSDL 2.0 extensibility and various
predefined extensions.</p>
<p>Section 5 covers various topics that may fall outside the scope
of WSDL 2.0, but shall provide useful background and best practice
guidances that may be useful when authoring a WSDL 2.0 document or
implementing the WSDL 2.0 specification.</p>
</div>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="UseIRI" id="UseIRI"></a>1.3 Use of URIs and IRIs</h3>
<p>The core specification of WSDL 2.0 supports Internationalized
Resource Identifiers or IRIs [<cite><a href="#RFC3987">IETF RFC
3987</a></cite>]. IRIs are a superset of URIs with added support
for internationalization. The URI syntax [<cite><a href=
"#RFC3986">IETF RFC 3986</a></cite>] only allows the use of a small
set of characters, including upper and lower case letters of the
English alphabet, European numerals and a few symbols. IRIs allow
the use of characters from a wider range of language scripts.</p>
<p>For simplicity, examples throughout this primer only use URIs.
If you are interested in learning more about the use of IRIs, you
might care to read the <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/International/articles/idn-and-iri/">paper</a>
prepared by the <a href="http://www.w3.org/International/">W3C
Internationalization Activity</a>.</p>
</div>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="notation" id="notation"></a>1.4 Notational
Conventions</h3>
<p>This document uses several XML namespaces, some of which are
defined by standards, and some are application-specific. Namespace
names of the general form "http://greath.example.com/..." represent
application or context-dependent URIs [<cite><a href=
"#RFC3986">IETF RFC 3986</a></cite>].Note also that the choice of
any namespace prefix is arbitrary and not semantically significant
(see [<cite><a href="#XMLInfoSet">XML Information
Set</a></cite>]).</p>
<p>Following the convention for XML syntax summary in
[<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART1">WSDL 2.0 Core</a></cite>], this primer
uses an informal syntax to describe the XML grammar of a WSDL 2.0
document:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>The syntax appears as an XML instance, but the values indicate
the data types instead of values.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Characters are appended to elements and attributes as follows:
"?" (0 or 1), "*" (0 or more), "+" (1 or more).</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Elements names ending in "…" indicate that elements/attributes
irrelevant to the context are being omitted.</p>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div1">
<h2><a name="basics" id="basics"></a>2. WSDL 2.0 Basics</h2>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="basic-example" id="basic-example"></a>2.1 Getting
Started: The GreatH Hotel Example</h3>
<p>This section introduces the basic concepts used in WSDL 2.0
through the description of a hypothetical hotel reservation
service. We start with a simple scenario, and later add more
requirements to illustrate how more advanced WSDL 2.0 features may
be used.</p>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="basics-greath-scenario" id=
"basics-greath-scenario"></a>2.1.1 Example Scenario: The GreatH
Hotel Reservation Service</h4>
<p>Hotel GreatH (a fictional hotel) is located in a remote island.
It has been relying on fax and phone to provide room reservations.
Even though the facilities and prices at GreatH are better than
what its competitor offers, GreatH notices that its competitor is
getting more customers than GreatH. After research, GreatH realizes
that this is because the competitor offers a Web service that
permits travel agent reservation systems to reserve rooms directly
over the Internet. GreatH then hires us to build a reservation Web
service with the following functionality:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p><em>CheckAvailability</em>. To check availability, the client
must specify a check-in date, a check-out date, and room type. The
Web service will return a room rate (a floating point number in
USD) if such a room is available, or a zero room rate if not. If
any input data is invalid, the service should return an error.
Thus, the service will accept a <code>checkAvailability</code>
message and return a <code>checkAvailabilityResponse</code> or
<code>invalidDataFault</code> message.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><em>MakeReservation</em>. To make a reservation, a client must
provide a name, address, and credit card information, and the
service will return a confirmation number if the reservation is
successful. The service will return an error message if the credit
card number or any other data field is invalid. Thus, the service
will accept a <code>makeReservation</code> message and return a
<code>makeReservationResponse</code> or
<code>invalidCreditCardFault</code> message.</p>
</li>
</ul>
We know that we will later need to build a complete system that
supports transactions and secured transmission, but initially we
will implement only minimal functionality. In fact, to simplify our
first example, we will implement only the
<em>CheckAvailability</em> operation.
<p>The next several sections proceed step-by-step through the
process of developing a WSDL 2.0 document that describes the
desired Web service. However, for those who can't wait to see a
complete example, here is the WSDL 2.0 document that we'll be
creating.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-initial" id="example-initial"></a><em><span>Example
2-1.</span> WSDL 2.0 Document for the GreatH Web Service (Initial
Example)</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
targetNamespace= "http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
xmlns:tns= "http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
xmlns:ghns = "http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc"
xmlns:wsoap= "http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap"
xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope"
xmlns:wsdlx= "http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-extensions">
<documentation>
This document describes the GreatH Web service. Additional
application-level requirements for use of this service --
beyond what WSDL 2.0 is able to describe -- are available
at http://greath.example.com/2004/reservation-documentation.html
</documentation>
<types>
<xs:schema
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc"
xmlns="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc">
<xs:element name="checkAvailability" type="tCheckAvailability"/>
<xs:complexType name="tCheckAvailability">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="checkInDate" type="xs:date"/>
<xs:element name="checkOutDate" type="xs:date"/>
<xs:element name="roomType" type="xs:string"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:element name="checkAvailabilityResponse" type="xs:double"/>
<xs:element name="invalidDataError" type="xs:string"/>
</xs:schema>
</types>
<interface name = "reservationInterface" >
<fault name = "invalidDataFault"
element = "ghns:invalidDataError"/>
<operation name="opCheckAvailability"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out"
style="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/iri"
wsdlx:safe = "true">
<input messageLabel="In"
element="ghns:checkAvailability" />
<output messageLabel="Out"
element="ghns:checkAvailabilityResponse" />
<outfault ref="tns:invalidDataFault" messageLabel="Out"/>
</operation>
</interface>
<binding name="reservationSOAPBinding"
interface="tns:reservationInterface"
type="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap"
wsoap:protocol="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/">
<fault ref="tns:invalidDataFault"
wsoap:code="soap:Sender"/>
<operation ref="tns:opCheckAvailability"
wsoap:mep="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/soap-response"/>
</binding>
<service name="reservationService"
interface="tns:reservationInterface">
<endpoint name="reservationEndpoint"
binding="tns:reservationSOAPBinding"
address ="http://greath.example.com/2004/reservation"/>
</service>
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="basics-getting-started" id=
"basics-getting-started"></a>2.1.2 Defining a WSDL 2.0 Target
Namespace</h4>
<p>Before writing our WSDL 2.0 document, we need to decide on a
<em>WSDL 2.0 target namespace</em> URI for it. The WSDL 2.0 target
namespace is analogous to an XML Schema target namespace.
Interface, binding and service names that we define in our WSDL 2.0
document will be associated with the WSDL 2.0 target namespace, and
thus will be distinguishable from similar names in a different WSDL
2.0 target namespace. (This will become important if using WSDL
2.0's import or interface inheritance mechanisms.)</p>
<p>The value of the WSDL 2.0 target namespace must be an absolute
URI. Furthermore, it should be dereferenceable to a WSDL 2.0
document that describes the Web service that the WSDL 2.0 target
namespace is used to describe. For example, the GreatH owners
should make the WSDL 2.0 document available from this URI. (And if
a WSDL 2.0 description is split into multiple documents, then the
WSDL 2.0 target namespace should resolve to a master document that
includes all the WSDL 2.0 documents needed for that service
description.) However, there is no absolute requirement for this
URI to be dereferenceable, so a WSDL 2.0 processor must not depend
on it being dereferenceable.</p>
<p>This recommendation may sound circular, but bear in mind that
the client might have obtained the WSDL 2.0 document from anywhere
-- not necessarily an authoritative source. But by dereferencing
the WSDL 2.0 target namespace URI, a user should be able to obtain
an authoritative version. Since GreatH will be the owner of the
service, the WSDL 2.0 target namespace URI should refer to a
location on the GreatH Web site or otherwise within its
control.</p>
<p>Once we have decided on a WSDL 2.0 target namespace URI, we can
begin our WSDL 2.0 document as the following empty shell.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-empty-shell" id=
"example-empty-shell"></a><em><span>Example 2-2.</span> An Initial
Empty WSDL 2.0 Document</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
targetNamespace= "http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
xmlns:tns= "http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
. . . >
. . .
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="example-empty-shell-explanation" id=
"example-empty-shell-explanation"></a>2.1.2.1 Explanation of
Example</h5>
<dl>
<dt class="label"><code><description</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>Every WSDL 2.0 document has a <code>description</code> element
as its top-most element. This merely acts as a container for the
rest of the WSDL 2.0 document, and is used to declare namespaces
that will be used throughout the document.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label">
<code>xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This is the XML namespace for WSDL 2.0 itself. We assign it as
the default namespace for this example by not defining a prefix for
it. In other words, any unprefixed elements in this example are
expected to be WSDL 2.0 elements (such as the
<code>description</code> element).</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code>targetNamespace=
"http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This defines the WSDL 2.0 target namespace that we have chosen
for the GreatH reservation service, as described above. Note that
this is not an actual XML namespace declaration. Rather, it is a
WSDL 2.0 attribute whose purpose is <em>analogous</em> to an XML
Schema target namespace.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code>xmlns:tns=
"http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This is an actual XML namespace declaration for use in our
GreatH service description. Note that this is the same URI that was
specified above as the value of the <code>targetNamespace</code>
attribute. This will allow us later to use the <code>tns:</code>
prefix in QNames, to refer to the WSDL 2.0 target namespace of the
GreatH service. (For more on QNames see [<cite><a href="#XMLNS">XML
Namespaces</a></cite>] section 3 <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names-20060816/#ns-qualnames">Qualified
Names</a>.)</p>
</dd>
</dl>
<p>Now we can start describing the GreatH service.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="basics-types" id="basics-types"></a>2.1.3 Defining
Message Types</h4>
<p>We know that the GreatH service will be sending and receiving
messages, so a good starting point in describing the service is to
define the message types that the service will use. We'll use XML
Schema to do so, because WSDL 2.0 processors are likely to support
XML Schema at a minimum. However, WSDL 2.0 does not prohibit the
use of some other schema definition language.</p>
<p>WSDL 2.0 allows message types to be defined directly within the
WSDL 2.0 document, inside the <code>types</code> element, which is
a child of the <code>description</code> element. (Later we'll see
how we can provide the type definitions in a separate document,
using XML Schema's <code>import</code> mechanism.) The following
schema defines <code>checkAvailability</code>,
<code>checkAvailabilityResponse</code> and
<code>invalidDataError</code> message types that we'll need.</p>
<p>In WSDL 2.0, all normal and fault message types must be defined
as single <em>elements</em> at the topmost level (though of course
each element may have any amount of substructure inside it). Thus,
a message type must not directly consist of a sequence of elements
or other complex type.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-initial-types" id=
"example-initial-types"></a><em><span>Example 2-3.</span> GreatH
Message Types</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
targetNamespace= "http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
xmlns:tns= "http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
xmlns:ghns = "http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc"
. . . >
...
<types>
<xs:schema
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc"
xmlns="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc">
<xs:element name="checkAvailability" type="tCheckAvailability"/>
<xs:complexType name="tCheckAvailability">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="checkInDate" type="xs:date"/>
<xs:element name="checkOutDate" type="xs:date"/>
<xs:element name="roomType" type="xs:string"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:element name="checkAvailabilityResponse" type="xs:double"/>
<xs:element name="invalidDataError" type="xs:string"/>
</xs:schema>
</types>
. . .
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="example-initial-types-explanation" id=
"example-initial-types-explanation"></a>2.1.3.1 Explanation of
Example</h5>
<dl>
<dt class="label"><code>xmlns:ghns =
"http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>We've added another namespace declaration. The <code>ghns</code>
namespace prefix will allow us (later, when defining an interface)
to reference the XML Schema target namespace that we define for our
message types. Thus, the URI we specify must be the same as the URI
that we define as the target namespace of our XML Schema types
(below) -- <em>not</em> the target namespace of the WSDL 2.0
document itself.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label">
<code>targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This is the XML Schema target namespace that we've created for
use by the GreatH reservation service. The
<code>checkAvailability</code>,
<code>checkAvailabilityResponse</code> and
<code>invalidDataError</code> element names will be associated with
this XML Schema target namespace.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code>checkAvailability</code>,
<code>checkAvailabilityResponse</code> and
<code>invalidDataError</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>These are the message types that we'll use. Note that these are
defined to be XML <em>elements</em>, as explained above.</p>
</dd>
</dl>
<p>Although we have defined several types, we have not yet
indicated which ones are to be used as message types for a Web
service. We'll do that in the next section.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="basics-interface" id="basics-interface"></a>2.1.4
Defining an Interface</h4>
<p>WSDL 2.0 enables one to separate the description of a Web
service's abstract functionality from the concrete details of how
and where that functionality is offered. This separation
facilitates different levels of reusability and distribution of
work in the lifecycle of a Web service and the WSDL 2.0 document
that describes it.</p>
<p>A WSDL 2.0 <code>interface</code> defines the abstract interface
of a Web service as a set of abstract <em>operations</em>, each
operation representing a simple interaction between the client and
the service. Each operation specifies the types of messages that
the service can send or receive as part of that operation. Each
operation also specifies a message exchange <em>pattern</em> that
indicates the sequence in which the associated messages are to be
transmitted between the parties. For example, the <em>in-out</em>
pattern (see <em>WSDL 2.0 Predefined Extensions</em>
[<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts</a></cite>] section
2.2.3 <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-adjuncts-20070626#in-out">In-Out</a>)
indicates that if the client sends a message <em>in</em> to the
service, the service will either send a reply message back
<em>out</em> to the client (in the normal case) or it will send a
fault message back to the client (in the case of an error). We will
explain more about message exchange <em>pattern</em>s in <a href=
"#more-interfaces-meps"><strong>2.4.4.3 Understanding Message
Exchange Patterns (MEPs)</strong></a></p>
<p>For the GreatH service, we will (initially) define an interface
containing a single operation, <code>opCheckAvailability</code>,
using the <code>checkAvailability</code> and
<code>checkAvailabilityResponse</code> message types that we
defined in the <code>types</code> section. We'll use the <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-adjuncts-20070626#in-out">in-out</a>
pattern for this operation, because this is the most natural way to
represent a simple request-response interaction. We could have
instead (for example) defined two separate operations using the
<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-adjuncts-20070626#in-out">in-only</a>
and <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-wsdl20-additional-meps-20070626#out-only">
out-only</a> patterns (see <em>WSDL 2.0 Predefined Extensions</em>
[<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts</a></cite>] section
2.2.1 <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-adjuncts-20070626#in-only">In-Only</a>
and section 2.2.5 <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-wsdl20-additional-meps-20070626#out-only">
Out-Only</a>), but that would just complicate matters for the
client, because we would then have to separately indicate to the
client developer that the two operations should be used together as
a request-response pair.</p>
<p>In addition to the normal input and output messages, we also
need to specify the fault message that we wish to use in the event
of an error. WSDL 2.0 permits fault messages to be declared within
the <code>interface</code> element in order to facilitate reuse of
faults across operations. If a fault occurs, it terminates whatever
message sequence was indicated by the message exchange pattern of
the operation.</p>
<p>Let's add these to our WSDL 2.0 document.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-initial-interface" id=
"example-initial-interface"></a><em><span>Example 2-4.</span>
GreatH Interface Definition</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
targetNamespace= "http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
xmlns:tns= "http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
xmlns:ghns = "http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc"
. . .
xmlns:wsdlx="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-extensions">
. . .
<types>
...
</types>
<interface name = "reservationInterface" >
<fault name = "invalidDataFault"
element = "ghns:invalidDataError"/>
<operation name="opCheckAvailability"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out"
style="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/iri"
wsdlx:safe = "true">
<input messageLabel="In"
element="ghns:checkAvailability" />
<output messageLabel="Out"
element="ghns:checkAvailabilityResponse" />
<outfault ref="tns:invalidDataFault" messageLabel="Out"/>
</operation>
</interface>
. . .
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="example-initial-interface-explanation" id=
"example-initial-interface-explanation"></a>2.1.4.1 Explanation of
Example</h5>
<dl>
<dt class="label"><code><interface name = "reservationInterface"
></code></dt>
<dd>
<p>Interfaces are declared directly inside the
<code>description</code> element. In this example, we are declaring
only one interface, but in general a WSDL 2.0 document may declare
more than one interface. Thus, each interface must be given a name
that is unique within the set of interfaces defined in this WSDL
2.0 target namespace. Interface names are tokens that must not
contain a space or colon (":").</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code><fault name =
"invalidDataFault"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>The <code>name</code> attribute defines a name for this fault.
The name is required so that when an operation is defined, it can
reference the desired fault by name. Fault names must be unique
within an interface.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code>element =
"ghns:invalidDataError"/></code></dt>
<dd>
<p>The <code>element</code> attribute specifies the schema type of
the fault message, as previously defined in the <code>types</code>
section.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code><operation
name="opCheckAvailability"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>The <code>name</code> attribute defines a name for this
operation, so that it can be referenced later when bindings are
defined. Operation names must also be unique within an interface.
(WSDL 2.0 uses separate symbol spaces for operation and fault
names, so operation name "foo" is distinct from fault name
"foo".)</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label">
<code>pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This line specifies that this operation will use the <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-adjuncts-20070626#in-out">in-out</a>
pattern as described above. WSDL 2.0 uses URIs to identify message
exchange patterns in order to ensure that the identifiers are
globally unambiguous, while also permitting future new patterns to
be defined by anyone. (However, just because someone defines a new
pattern and creates a URI to identify it, that does <em>not</em>
mean that other WSDL 2.0 processors will automatically recognize or
understand that pattern. As with any other extension, it can only
be used among processors that <em>do</em> recognize and understand
it.)</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label">
<code>style="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/iri"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This line indicates that the XML schema defining the input
message of this operation follows a set of rules as specified in
<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-adjuncts-20070626#_operation_iri_style">
IRI Style</a> that ensures the message can be serialized as an
IRI.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code>wsdlx:safe="true" ></code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This line indicates that this operation will not obligate the
client in any way, i.e., the client can safely invoke this
operation without fear that it may be incurring an obligation (such
as agreeing to buy something). This is further explained in
<a href="#more-interfaces-operations"><strong>2.4.4 Interface
Operations</strong></a>.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code><input messageLabel="In"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>The <code>input</code> element specifies an input message. Even
though we have already specified which message exchange pattern the
operation will use, a message exchange pattern represents a
template for a message sequence, and in theory could consist of
multiple input and/or output messages. Thus we must also indicate
which potential input message in the pattern this particular input
message represents. This is the purpose of the
<code>messageLabel</code> attribute. Since the <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-adjuncts-20070626#in-out">in-out</a>
pattern that we've chosen to use only has one input message, it is
trivial in this case: we simply fill in the message label "In" that
was defined in <em>WSDL 2.0 Predefined Extensions</em>
[<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts</a></cite>] section
2.2.3 <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-adjuncts-20070626#in-out">In-Out</a>
for the <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-adjuncts-20070626#in-out">in-out</a>
pattern. However, if a new pattern is defined that involve multiple
input messages, then the different input messages in the pattern
could then be distinguished by using different labels.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code>element="ghns:checkAvailability"
/></code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This specifies the message type for this input message, as
defined previously in the <code>types</code> section.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code><output messageLabel="Out" . .
.</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This is similar to defining an input message.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code><outfault ref="tns:invalidDataFault"
messageLabel="Out"/></code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This associates an output fault with this operation. Faults are
declared a little differently than normal messages. The
<code>ref</code> attribute refers to the name of a previously
defined fault in this interface -- not a message schema type
directly. Since message exchange patterns could in general involve
a sequence of several messages, a fault could potentially occur at
various points within the message sequence. Because one may wish to
associate a different fault with each permitted point in the
sequence, the <code>messageLabel</code> is used to indicate the
desired point for this particular fault. It does so indirectly by
specifying the message that will either trigger this fault or that
this fault will replace, depending on the pattern. (Some patterns
use a <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-adjuncts-20070626#fault-trigger">
message-triggers-fault rule</a>; others use a <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-adjuncts-20070626#fault-replacement">
fault-replaces-message</a> rule. See <em>WSDL 2.0 Predefined
Extensions</em> [<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0
Adjuncts</a></cite>] section 2.1.2 <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-adjuncts-20070626#fault-trigger">
Message Triggers Fault</a> and section 2.1.1 <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-adjuncts-20070626#fault-replacement">
Fault Replaces Message</a>.)</p>
</dd>
</dl>
<p>Now that we've defined the abstract interface for the GreatH
service, we're ready to define a binding for it.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="basics-binding" id="basics-binding"></a>2.1.5 Defining
a Binding</h4>
<p>Although we have specified <em>what</em> abstract messages can
be exchanged with the GreatH Web service, we have not yet specified
<em>how</em> those messages can be exchanged. This is the purpose
of a <em>binding</em>. A binding specifies concrete message format
and transmission protocol details for an interface, and must supply
such details for every operation and fault in the interface.</p>
<p>In the general case, binding details for each operation and
fault are specified using <code>operation</code> and
<code>fault</code> elements inside a <code>binding</code> element,
as shown in the example below. However, in some cases it is
possible to use defaulting rules to supply the information. The
WSDL 2.0 SOAP binding extension, for example, defines some
defaulting rules for operations. (See <em>Web Services Description
Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 2: Adjuncts</em> [<cite><a href=
"#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts</a></cite>], <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-adjuncts-20070626#soap-defaults">
Default Binding Rules</a>.)</p>
<p>In order to accommodate new kinds of message formats and
transmission protocols, bindings are defined using extensions to
the WSDL 2.0 language, via WSDL 2.0's open content model. (See
<a href="#adv-extensibility"><strong>4.1 Extensibility</strong></a>
for more on extensibility.) WSDL 2.0 Part 2 [<cite><a href=
"#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts</a></cite>] defines binding
extensions for SOAP 1.2 [<cite><a href="#SOAP12-PART1">SOAP 1.2
Part 1: Messaging Framework</a></cite>] and HTTP 1.1
[<cite><a href="#RFC2616">IETF RFC 2616</a></cite>] as predefined
extensions, so that SOAP 1.2 or HTTP 1.1 bindings can be easily
defined in WSDL 2.0 documents. However, other specifications could
define new binding extensions that could also be used to define
bindings. (As with any extension, other WSDL 2.0 processors would
have to know about the new constructs in order to make use of
them.)</p>
<p>For the GreatH service, we will use SOAP 1.2 as our concrete
message format and HTTP as our underlying transmission protocol, as
shown below.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-initial-binding" id=
"example-initial-binding"></a><em><span>Example 2-5.</span> GreatH
Binding Definition</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
targetNamespace= "http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
xmlns:tns= "http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
xmlns:ghns = "http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc"
xmlns:wsoap= "http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap"
xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope">
. . .
<types>
. . .
</types>
<interface name = "reservationInterface" >
...
</interface>
<binding name="reservationSOAPBinding"
interface="tns:reservationInterface"
type="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap"
wsoap:protocol="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/">
<operation ref="tns:opCheckAvailability"
wsoap:mep="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/soap-response"/>
<fault ref="tns:invalidDataFault"
wsoap:code="soap:Sender"/>
</binding>
. . .
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="example-initial-binding-explanation" id=
"example-initial-binding-explanation"></a>2.1.5.1 Explanation of
Example</h5>
<dl>
<dt class="label"><code>xmlns:wsoap=
"http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>We've added two more namespace declarations. This one is the
namespace for the SOAP 1.2 binding extension that is defined in
WSDL 2.0 Part 3 [<cite><a href="#SOAP12-PART1">SOAP 1.2 Part 1:
Messaging Framework</a></cite>]. Elements and attributes prefixed
with <code>wsoap:</code> are constructs defined there.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label">
<code>xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This namespace is defined by the SOAP 1.2 specification itself.
The SOAP 1.2 specification defines certain terms within this
namespace to unambiguously identify particular concepts. Thus, we
will use the <code>soap:</code> prefix when we need to refer to one
of those terms.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code><binding
name="reservationSOAPBinding"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>Bindings are declared directly inside the
<code>description</code> element. The <code>name</code> attribute
defines a name for this binding. Each name must be unique among all
bindings in this WSDL 2.0 target namespace, and will be used later
when we define a service endpoint that references this binding.
WSDL 2.0 uses separate symbol spaces for interfaces, bindings and
services, so interface "foo", binding "foo" and service "foo" are
all distinct.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label">
<code>interface="tns:reservationInterface"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This is the name of the interface whose message format and
transmission protocols we are specifying. As discussed in <a href=
"#more-bindings"><strong>2.5 More on Bindings</strong></a>, a
reusable binding can be defined by omitting the
<code>interface</code> attribute. Note also the use of the
<code>tns:</code> prefix, which refers to the previously defined
WSDL 2.0 target namespace for this WSDL 2.0 document. In this case
it may seem silly to have to specify the <code>tns:</code> prefix,
but in <a href="#adv-import-and-authoring"><strong>3.1 Importing
WSDL</strong></a> we will see how WSDL 2.0's import mechanism can
be used to combine components that are defined in different WSDL
2.0 target namespaces.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label">
<code>type="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This specifies what kind of concrete message format to use, in
this case SOAP 1.2.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label">
<code>wsoap:protocol="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This attribute is specific to WSDL 2.0's SOAP binding extension
(thus it uses the <code>wsoap:</code> prefix). It specifies the
underlying transmission protocol that should be used, in this case
HTTP.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code><operation
ref="tns:opCheckAvailability"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This is not defining a new operation; rather, it is referencing
the previously defined <code>opCheckAvailability</code> operation
in order to specify binding details for it. This element can be
omitted if defaulting rules are instead used to supply the
necessary information. (See the SOAP binding extension in WSDL 2.0
Part 2 [<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts</a></cite>]
section 4.3 <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-adjuncts-20070626#soap-defaults">
Default Binding Rules</a> .)</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label">
<code>wsoap:mep="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/soap-response"></code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This attribute is also specific to WSDL 2.0's SOAP binding
extension. It specifies the SOAP message exchange pattern (MEP)
that will be used to implement the abstract WSDL 2.0 message
exchange pattern (<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-adjuncts-20070626#in-out">in-out</a>)
that was specified when the <code>opCheckAvailability</code>
operation was defined.</p>
<p>When HTTP is used as the underlying transport protocol (as in
this example) the <code>wsoap:mep</code> attribute also controls
whether GET or POST will be used as the underlying HTTP method. In
this case, the use of
<code>wsoap:mep="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/soap-response"</code>
causes GET to be used by default. See also <a href=
"#adv-get-vs-post"><strong>2.5.7 HTTP GET Versus POST: Which to
Use?</strong></a>.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code><fault
ref="tns:invalidDataFault"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>As with a binding operation, this is not declaring a new fault;
rather, it is referencing a fault (<code>invalidDataFault</code>)
that was previously defined in the <code>opCheckAvailability</code>
interface, in order to specify binding details for it.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code>wsoap:code="soap:Sender"/></code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This attribute is also specific to WSDL 2.0's SOAP binding
extension. This specifies the SOAP 1.2 fault code that will cause
this fault message to be sent. If desired, a list of subcodes can
also be specified using the optional <code>wsoap:subcodes</code>
attribute.</p>
</dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="basics-service" id="basics-service"></a>2.1.6 Defining
a Service</h4>
<p>Now that our binding has specified <em>how</em> messages will be
transmitted, we are ready to specify <em>where</em> the service can
be accessed, by use of the <code>service</code> element.</p>
<p>A WSDL 2.0 <em>service</em> specifies a single interface that
the service will support, and a list of <em>endpoint</em> locations
where that service can be accessed. Each endpoint must also
reference a previously defined binding to indicate what protocols
and transmission formats are to be used at that endpoint. A service
is only permitted to have one interface. (See <a href=
"#adv-multiple-docs-describing-same-service"><strong>5.4 Multiple
Interfaces for the Same Service</strong></a> for further discussion
of this limitation.)</p>
<p>Here is a definition for our GreatH service.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-initial-service" id=
"example-initial-service"></a><em><span>Example 2-6.</span> GreatH
Service Definition</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
targetNamespace= "http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
xmlns:tns= "http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
xmlns:ghns = "http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc"
xmlns:wsoap= "http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap"
xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope">
. . .
<types>
. . .
</types>
<interface name = "reservationInterface" >
. . .
</interface>
<binding name="reservationSOAPBinding"
interface="tns:reservationInterface"
. . . >
. . .
</binding>
<service name="reservationService"
interface="tns:reservationInterface">
<endpoint name="reservationEndpoint"
binding="tns:reservationSOAPBinding"
address ="http://greath.example.com/2004/reservation"/>
</service>
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="example-initial-service-explanation" id=
"example-initial-service-explanation"></a>2.1.6.1 Explanation of
Example</h5>
<dl>
<dt class="label"><code><service
name="reservationService"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This defines a name for this service, which must be unique among
service names in the WSDL 2.0 target namespace. The name attribute
is required. It allows URIs to be created that identify components
in WSDL 2.0 description. (See <em>WSDL 2.0 Core Language</em>
[<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART1">WSDL 2.0 Core</a></cite>] appendix C
<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-20070626/#wsdl-iri-references">
IRI References for WSDL 2.0 constructs</a>.)</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label">
<code>interface="tns:reservationInterface"></code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This specifies the name of the previously defined interface that
these service endpoints will support.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code><endpoint
name="reservationEndpoint"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This defines an endpoint for the service, and a name for this
endpoint, which must be unique within this service.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label">
<code>binding="tns:reservationSOAPBinding"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This specifies the name of the previously defined binding to be
used by this endpoint.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code>address
="http://greath.example.com/2004/reservation"/></code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This specifies the physical address at which this service can be
accessed using the binding specified by the <code>binding</code>
attribute.</p>
</dd>
</dl>
<p>That's it! Well, almost.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="basics-documentation" id=
"basics-documentation"></a>2.1.7 Documenting the Service</h4>
<p>As we have seen, a WSDL 2.0 document is inherently only a
<em>partial</em> description of a service. Although it captures the
basic mechanics of interacting with the service -- the message
types, transmission protocols, service location, etc. -- in
general, additional documentation will need to explain other
application-level requirements for its use. For example, such
documentation should explain the purpose and use of the service,
the meanings of all messages, constraints on their use, and the
sequence in which operations should be invoked.</p>
<p>The <code>documentation</code> element allows the WSDL 2.0
author to include some human-readable documentation inside a WSDL
2.0 document. It is also a convenient place to reference any
additional external documentation that a client developer may need
in order to use the service. It can appear in a number of places in
a WSDL 2.0 document (see <a href=
"#wsdl-infoset-diagram"><strong>2.2.1 WSDL 2.0
Infoset</strong></a>), though in this example we have only
demonstrated its use at the beginning.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-initial-documentation" id=
"example-initial-documentation"></a><em><span>Example 2-7.</span>
Documenting the GreatH Service</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description
. . . >
<documentation>
This document describes the GreatH Web service. Additional
application-level requirements for use of this service --
beyond what WSDL 2.0 is able to describe -- are available
at http://greath.example.com/2004/reservation-documentation.html
</documentation>
. . .
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="example-initial-documentation-explanation" id=
"example-initial-documentation-explanation"></a>2.1.7.1 Explanation
of Example</h5>
<dl>
<dt class="label"><code><documentation></code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This element is optional, but a good idea to include. It can
contain arbitrary mixed content.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code>at
http://greath.example.com/2004/reservation-documentation.html</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>The most important thing to include is a pointer to any
additional documentation that a client developer would need in
order to use the service.</p>
</dd>
</dl>
<p>This completes our presentation of the GreatH example. In the
following sections, we will move on to look into more details of
various aspects of WSDL 2.0 specification.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="wsdl-xml-representation" id=
"wsdl-xml-representation"></a>2.2 WSDL 2.0 Infoset, Schema and
Component Model</h3>
<p>In computer science theory, a language consists of a (possibly
infinite) set of sentences, and each sentence is a finite string of
literal symbols or characters. A language specification must
therefore define the set of sentences in that language, and, to be
useful, it should also indicate the meaning of each sentence.
Indeed, this is the purpose of the WSDL 2.0 specification.</p>
<p>However, instead of defining WSDL 2.0 in terms of literal
symbols or characters, to avoid dependency on any particular
character encoding, WSDL 2.0 is defined in terms of the <em>XML
Infoset</em> [<cite><a href="#XMLInfoSet">XML Information
Set</a></cite>]. Specifically, a <em>WSDL 2.0 document</em>
consists of a <code>description</code> element information item (in
the XML Infoset) that conforms to the WSDL 2.0 specification. In
other words, a sentence in the WSDL 2.0 language is a
<code>description</code> element information item that obeys the
additional constraints spelled out in the WSDL 2.0
specification.</p>
<p>Since an XML Infoset can be created from more than one physical
document, a WSDL 2.0 document does not necessarily correspond to a
single <em>physical</em> document: the word "document" is used
figuratively, for convenience. Furthermore, since WSDL 2.0 provides
<code>import</code> and <code>include</code> mechanisms, a WSDL 2.0
document may reference other WSDL 2.0 documents to facilitate
convenient organization or reuse. In such cases, the meaning of the
including or importing document as a whole will depend (in part) on
the meaning of the included or imported document.</p>
<p>The XML Infoset uses terms like "element information item" and
"attribute information item". Unfortunately, those terms are rather
lengthy to repeat often. Thus, for convenience, this primer often
uses the terms "element" and "attribute" instead, as a shorthand.
It should be understood, however, that since WSDL 2.0 is based on
the XML Infoset, we really mean "element information item" and
"attribute information item", respectively.</p>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="wsdl-infoset-diagram" id=
"wsdl-infoset-diagram"></a>2.2.1 WSDL 2.0 Infoset</h4>
<p>The following diagram gives an overview of the XML Infoset for a
WSDL 2.0 document.</p>
<div class="figure" style="text-align: center"><br />
<img src="images/WSDL20InfosetModel.png" alt=
"WSDL 2.0 Infoset Diagram" />
<p style="text-align:left"><em><span>Figure 2-1.</span> WSDL 2.0
Infoset Diagram</em></p>
<br /></div>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="wsdl-schema" id="wsdl-schema"></a>2.2.2 WSDL 2.0
Schema</h4>
<p>The WSDL 2.0 specification supplies a <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl">normative WSDL 2.0 schema</a>, defined
in [<cite><a href="#XMLSchemaP1">XML Schema Structures</a></cite>],
which can be used as an aid in validating WSDL 2.0 documents. We
say "as an aid" here because WSDL 2.0 specification [<cite><a href=
"#WSDL-PART1">WSDL 2.0 Core</a></cite>] often provides further
constraints to the WSDL 2.0 schema. In addition to being valid with
the normative schema, a WSDL 2.0 document must also follow all the
constraints defined by the WSDL 2.0 specification.</p>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="element-order" id="element-order"></a>2.2.2.1 WSDL 2.0
Element Ordering</h5>
<p>This section gives an example of how WSDL 2.0 specification
constrains the WSDL 2.0 schema about the ordering of top WSDL 2.0
elements.</p>
<p>Although the WSDL 2.0 schema does not indicate the required
ordering of elements, the WSDL 2.0 specification (WSDL 2.0 Part 1
[<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART1">WSDL 2.0 Core</a></cite>] section
"<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-20070626#Description_XMLRep">XML
Representation of Description Component</a>") clearly states a set
of constraints about how the child elements of the
<code>description</code> element should be ordered. Thus, the order
of the WSDL 2.0 elements matters, even though the WSDL 2.0 schema
does not capture this constraint.</p>
<p>The following is a pseudo-content model of
<code>description</code>.</p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<<strong>description</strong>>
<documentation />?
[ <import /> | <include /> ]*
<types />?
[ <interface /> | <binding /> | <service /> ]*
</<strong>description</strong>>
</pre></div>
<p>In other words, the children elements of the
<code>description</code> element should be ordered as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>An optional <code>documentation</code> comes first, if
present.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>then comes zero or more elements from among the following, in
any order:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p><code>include</code></p>
</li>
<li>
<p><code>import</code></p>
</li>
<li>
<p>extensions</p>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<p>An optional <code>types</code> follows</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Zero or more elements from among the following, in any
order:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p><code>interface</code></p>
</li>
<li>
<p><code>binding</code></p>
</li>
<li>
<p><code>service</code></p>
</li>
<li>
<p>extensions.</p>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Note the term "extension" is used above as a convenient way to
refer to namespace-qualified extension elements. The namespace name
of such extension elements must not
be"http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl".</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="component-model" id="component-model"></a>2.2.3 WSDL
2.0 Component Model</h4>
<p>The WSDL 2.0 Infoset model above illustrates the required
structure of a WSDL 2.0 document, using the XML Infoset. However,
the WSDL 2.0 language also imposes many semantic constraints over
and above structural conformance to this XML Infoset. In order to
precisely describe these constraints, and as an aid in precisely
defining the meaning of each WSDL 2.0 document, the WSDL 2.0
specification defines a <em>component model</em> as an additional
layer of abstraction above the XML Infoset. Constraints and meaning
are defined in terms of this component model, and the definition of
each component includes a mapping that specifies how values in the
component model are derived from corresponding items in the XML
Infoset. The following diagram gives an overview of the WSDL 2.0
components and their containment hierarchy.</p>
<div class="figure" style="text-align: center"><br />
<img src="images/WSDL20Components.png" alt=
"WSDL 2.0 Components Containment hierarchy" />
<p style="text-align:left"><em><span>Figure 2-2.</span> WSDL 2.0
Components Containment hierarchy</em></p>
<br /></div>
<p>In general, the WSDL 2.0 component model parallels the structure
of the required XML Infoset illustrated above. For example, the
<em>Description</em>, <em>Interface</em>, <em>Binding</em>,
<em>Service</em> and <em>Endpoint</em> <em>components</em>
correspond to the <code>description</code>, <code>interface</code>,
<code>binding</code>, <code>service</code>, and
<code>endpoint</code> element information items, respectively.
Since WSDL 2.0 relies heavily on the component model to convey the
meaning of the constructs in the WSDL 2.0 language, you can think
of the Description component as representing the meaning of the
<code>description</code> element information item, and hence, it
represents the meaning of the WSDL 2.0 document as a whole.</p>
<p>Furthermore, each of these components has <em>properties</em>
whose values are (usually) derived from the element and attribute
information item children of those element information items. For
example, the Service component corresponds to the
<code>service</code> element information item, so the Service
component has an {endpoints} property whose value is a set of
Endpoint components corresponding to the <code>endpoint</code>
element information item children of that <code>service</code>
element information item. (Whew!)</p>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="import-component" id="import-component"></a>2.2.3.1
WSDL 2.0 Import and Include</h5>
<p>The WSDL 2.0 component model is particularly helpful in defining
the meaning of <code>import</code> and <code>include</code>
elements. The <code>include</code> element allows you to assemble
the contents of a given WSDL 2.0 namespace from several WSDL 2.0
documents that define components for that namespace. The components
defined by a given WSDL 2.0 document consist of those whose
definitions are contained in the document and those that are
defined by any WSDL 2.0 documents that are included in it via the
<code>include</code> element. The effect of the
<code>include</code> element is cumulative so that if document A
includes document B and document B includes document C, then the
components defined by document A consist of those whose definitions
are contained in documents A, B, and C.</p>
<p>In contrast, the <code>import</code> element does not define any
components. Instead, the <code>import</code> element declares that
the components whose definitions are contained in a WSDL 2.0
document for a given WSDL 2.0 namespace refer to components that
belong to a different WSDL 2.0 namespace. If a WSDL 2.0 document
contains definitions of components that refer to other namespaces,
then those namespaces must be declared via an <code>import</code>
element. The <code>import</code> element also has an optional
<code>location</code> attribute that is a hint to the processor
where the definitions of the imported namespace can be found.
However, the processor may find the definitions by other means, for
example, by using a catalog.</p>
<p>After processing any <code>include</code> elements and locating
the components that belong to any imported namespaces, the WSDL 2.0
component model for a WSDL 2.0 document will contain a set of
components that belong to the document's WSDL 2.0 namespace and any
imported namespaces. These components will refer to each other,
usually via QName references. A WSDL 2.0 document is invalid if any
component reference cannot be resolved, whether or not the
referenced component belongs to the same or a different
namespace.</p>
<p>We will cover a lot more about how to use WSDL 2.0 import and
include in <a href="#adv-import-and-authoring"><strong>3.1
Importing WSDL</strong></a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="more-types" id="more-types"></a>2.3 More on Message
Types</h3>
<p>Message types may be defined in various schema languages. In
this primer, we will only focus on the use of XML Schema
[<cite><a href="#XMLSchemaP1">XML Schema Structures</a></cite>]
since it's natively supported by WSDL 2.0. Message types defined in
other languages may be introduced into a WSDL 2.0
<code>description</code> via extensions, see the W3C notes
[<cite><a href="#altschemalangs">Alternative Schema Languages
Support</a></cite>] for more details.</p>
<p>The following is the XML syntax for the <code>wsdl:types</code>
element:</p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<description>
<<strong>types</strong>>
<documentation />*
[ <xs:import namespace="<em>xs:anyURI</em>" schemaLocation="<em>xs:anyURI</em>"? /> |
<xs:schema targetNamespace="<em>xs:anyURI</em>" /> |
<em>other extension elements</em> ]*
</<strong>types</strong>>
</description>
</pre></div>
<p>There are two ways to make XML Schema message definitions
visible, or in other words, available for reference by QName (see
WSDL 2.0 Part 1 [<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART1">WSDL 2.0
Core</a></cite>] "<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-20070626#qnameres">QName
Resolution</a>") in a WSDL 2.0 document: inlining or importing.
Inlining is to put the schema definitions directly within an
<code>xs:schema</code> element under <code>types</code>. Importing
is to have the schema defined in a separate document and then bring
it into the WSDL definition by using <code>xs:import</code>
directly under <code>types</code>.</p>
<p>In the following sections, we will provide examples for the
different mechanisms.</p>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="more-types-schema-inline" id=
"more-types-schema-inline"></a>2.3.1 Inlining XML Schema</h4>
<p>We have already seen an example of using inlined schema
definitions in section <a href="#basics-types"><strong>2.1.3
Defining Message Types</strong></a>. When XML Schema is inlined
directly in a WSDL 2.0 document, it uses the existing top-level
<code>xs:schema</code> element defined by XML Schema to do so, as
though a schema file had been copied and pasted into the
<code>types</code> element. The schema components defined in the
inlined schema are then available to the containing WSDL 2.0
<code>description</code> for reference by QName. For instance, in
<a href="#example-initial">Example 2-1</a>, the input message of
the interface operation "opCheckAvailability" is defined by the
"ghns:checkAvailability" element in the inlined schema.</p>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="more-types-schema-import" id=
"more-types-schema-import"></a>2.3.2 Importing XML Schema</h4>
<p>XML Schema components can be defined in separate schema files
and be made available to a WSDL2.0 <code>description</code> by
using <code>xs:import</code> directly under <code>types</code>.</p>
<p>There are many cases where one would prefer having schema
definitions in separate schema files. One reason is the reusability
of the schema definitions. Inlined schema definitions are only
available to the containing WSDL 2.0 <code>description</code>.
Although WSDL 2.0 provides a <code>wsdl:import</code> mechanism for
importing other WSDL files, schema definitions inlined in an
imported WSDL document are NOT automatically made available to the
importing WSDL 2.0 document, even though other WSDL 2.0 components
(such as Interfaces, Bindings, etc.) do become available.
Therefore, if one wishes to share schema definitions across several
WSDL 2.0 <code>description</code>s, these schema definitions should
instead be placed in separate XML Schema documents and imported
into each WSDL 2.0 <code>description</code> using
<code>xs:import</code> directly under <code>types</code>.</p>
<p>Let's see an example. Assuming the message types in <a href=
"#example-initial-types">Example 2-3</a> are defined in a separate
schema file named
"http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc.xsd" with a target
namespace "http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc", the
schema definition can then be brought into the WSDL 2.0
<code>description</code> using <code>xs:import</code>. Note that
only components in the imported namespace
"http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc" are available for
reference in the WSDL 2.0 document.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-schema-import" id=
"example-schema-import"></a><em><span>Example 2-8.</span>
<code>xs:import</code>ed Message Definitions that Are Visible to
the Containing WSDL 2.0 Description</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
targetNamespace= "http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
xmlns:tns= "http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
xmlns:ghns = "http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc"
. . . >
. . .
<types>
<xs:import namespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc"
schemaLocation= "http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc.xsd"/>
</types>
. . .
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>It's important to note that <code>xs:import</code> used directly
under <code>wsdl:types</code> has been given a different visibility
than <code>xs:import</code> used inside an inlined schema. An
inlined schema may use native XML schema <code>xs:import</code> to
bring in external schema definitions that are in different
namespaces; However, though this is the schema importing mechanism
recommended for WSDL 1.1 in <a href=
"http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.1-2004-08-24.html#WSDL_and_Schema_Import">
WS-I Basic Profile</a>, according to XML Schema specification, such
enclosed message definitions are only visible to the importing
schema (in this case, the inlined schema). They are not visible to
the containing WSDL 2.0 <code>description</code>.</p>
<p>If we change <a href="#example-schema-import">Example 2-8</a> to
use XML Schema's native <code>xs:import</code> element in an
inlined schema, the schema components defined in the namespace
http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc are not available to
our example WSDL 2.0 definition any more.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-schema-import1" id=
"example-schema-import1"></a><em><span>Example 2-9.</span>
<code>xs:import</code>ed Message Definitions in Inlined Schema Are
Not Visible to the Containing WSDL 2.0 Description</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
targetNamespace= "http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
xmlns:tns= "http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
xmlns:ghns = "http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc"
. . . >
. . .
<types>
<xs:schema targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvcWrapper">
<xs:import namespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc"
schemaLocation= "http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc.xsd"/>
</xs:schema>
</types>
. . .
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>Of course, an inlined XML schema may also use XML Schema's
native <code>xs:include</code> element to refer to schemas defined
in separate files when the included schema has no namespace or has
the same namespace as the including schema. In this case, according
to XML Schema, the included schema components become a part of the
including schema as though they had been copied and pasted into the
including schema. Hence, the included schema components are also
available to the containing WSDL 2.0 <code>description</code> for
reference by QName.</p>
<p>The following example has the same effect as <a href=
"#example-initial-types">Example 2-3</a>:</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-schema-import2" id=
"example-schema-import2"></a><em><span>Example 2-10.</span>
<code>xs:included</code> Message Definitions in Inlined Schema Are
Visible to the Containing WSDL 2.0 Description</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
targetNamespace= "http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
xmlns:tns= "http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
xmlns:ghns = "http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc"
. . . >
. . .
<types>
<xs:schema targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc">
<xs:include schemaLocation= "http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc.xsd"/>
</xs:schema>
</types>
. . .
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="more-types-import-include-summary" id=
"more-types-import-include-summary"></a>2.3.3 Summary of Import and
Include Mechanisms</h4>
<p>So far we have briefly covered both WSDL import and include and
schema import and include. The following table summarizes the
similarities and differences between the WSDL 2.0 and XML Schema
<code>include</code> and <code>import</code> mechanisms. We will
talk a lot more about importing mechanisms in <a href=
"#adv-import-and-authoring"><strong>3.1 Importing WSDL</strong></a>
and <a href="#adv-multiple-inline-schemas"><strong>3.2 Importing
Schemas</strong></a></p>
<a name="imin" id="imin"></a>
<table border="1">
<caption>Table 2-1. Summary of Import and Include
Mechanisms</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mechanism</th>
<th rowspan="1" colspan="1">Object</th>
<th rowspan="1" colspan="1">Meaning</th>
<th rowspan="1" colspan="1">Visibility of Schema Components</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">wsdl:import</td>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">WSDL 2.0 Namespace</td>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Declare that WSDL 2.0 components refer
to WSDL 2.0 components from a DIFFERENT targetNamespace.</td>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">XML Schema Components in the imported
<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-20070626#component-Description">
Description</a> component are NOT visible to the containing
<code>description</code>.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">wsdl:include</td>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">WSDL 2.0 Document</td>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Merge Interface, Binding and Service
components from another WSDL 2.0 document that has the SAME
targetNamespace.</td>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">XML Schema components in the included
<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-20070626#component-Description">
Description</a> component's {<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-20070626#property-Description.elementdeclarations">element
declarations</a>} and {<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-20070626#property-Description.typedefinitions">type
definitions</a>} properties are visible to the containing
<code>description</code>.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">wsdl:types/ xs:import</td>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">XML Schema Namespace</td>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Declare that XML Schema components
refer to XML Schema components from a DIFFERENT
targetNamespace.</td>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">XML Schema components in the imported
namespace are visible to the containing
<code>description</code>.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">wsdl:types/ xs:schema/xs:import</td>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">XML Schema Namespace</td>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Declare that XML Schema components
refer to XML Schema components from a DIFFERENT
targetNamespace.</td>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">XML Schema components in the imported
namespace are NOT visible to the containing
<code>description</code>.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">wsdl:types/ xs:schema/xs:include</td>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">XML Schema Document</td>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Merge XML Schema components from
another XML Schema document that has the SAME or NO
targetNamespace.</td>
<td rowspan="1" colspan="1">XML Schema components in the included
document are visible to the containing
<code>description</code>.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br /></div>
</div>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="more-interfaces" id="more-interfaces"></a>2.4 More on
Interfaces</h3>
<p>We previously mentioned that a WSDL 2.0 interface is basically a
set of operations. However, there are some additional capabilities
that we have not yet covered. First, let's review the syntax for
the <code>interface</code> element.</p>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="more-interfaces-interfaces" id=
"more-interfaces-interfaces"></a>2.4.1 Interface Syntax</h4>
<p>Below is the XML syntax summary of the <code>interface</code>
element, simplified by omitting optional
<code><documentation></code> elements:</p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<description targetNamespace="<em>xs:anyURI</em>" >
. . .
<interface name="<em>xs:NCName</em>"
extends="<em>list of xs:QName</em>"?
styleDefault="<em>list of xs:anyURI</em>"? >
<fault name="<em>xs:NCName</em>"
element="<em>xs:QName</em>"? >
</fault>*
<operation name="<em>xs:NCName</em>"
pattern="<em>xs:anyURI</em>"
style="<em>list of xs:anyURI</em>"?
wsdlx:safe="<em>xs:boolean</em>"? >
<input messageLabel="<em>xs:NCName</em>"?
element="<em>union of xs:QName, xs:Token</em>"? >
</input>*
<output messageLabel="<em>xs:NCName</em>"?
element="<em>union of xs:QName, xs:Token</em>"? >
</output>*
<infault ref="<em>xs:QName</em>" messageLabel="<em>xs:NCName</em>"? > </infault>*
<outfault ref="<em>xs:QName</em>" messageLabel="<em>xs:NCName</em>"? > </outfault>*
</operation>*
</interface>*
. . .
</description>
</pre></div>
<p>The <code>interface</code> element has two optional attributes:
<code>styleDefault</code> and <code>extends</code>. The
<code>styleDefault</code> attribute can be used to define a default
value for the <code>style</code> attributes of all operations under
this interface (see WSDL 2.0 Part 1 "<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-20070626#Interface_styleDefault_attribute">styleDefault
attribute information item</a>"). The <code>extends</code>
attribute is for inheritance, and is explained next.</p>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="more-interfaces-inheritance" id=
"more-interfaces-inheritance"></a>2.4.2 Interface Inheritance</h4>
<p>The optional <code>extends</code> attribute allows an interface
to extend or inherit from one or more other interfaces. In such
cases the interface contains the operations of the interfaces it
extends, along with any operations it defines directly. Two things
about extending interfaces deserve some attention.</p>
<p>First, an inheritance loop (or infinite recursion) is
prohibited: the interfaces that a given interface extends must NOT
themselves extend that interface either directly or indirectly.</p>
<p>Second, we must explain what happens when operations from two
different interfaces have the same target namespace and operation
name. There are two cases: either the component models of the
operations are the same, or they are different. If the component
models are the same (per the component comparison algorithm defined
in WSDL 2.0 Part 1 [<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART1">WSDL 2.0
Core</a></cite>] " <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-20070626#compequiv">Equivalence
of Components</a> ") then they are considered to be the same
operation, i.e., they are collapsed into a single operation, and
the fact that they were included more than once is not considered
an error. (For operations, component equivalence basically means
that the two operations have the same set of attributes and
descendants.) In the second case, if two operations have the same
name in the same WSDL 2.0 target namespace but are not equivalent,
then it is an error. For the above reason, it is considered good
practice to ensure that all operations within the same target
namespace are named uniquely.</p>
<p>Finally, since faults can also be defined as children of the
<code>interface</code> element (as described in the following
sections), the same name-collision rules apply to those
constructs.</p>
<p>Let's say the GreatH hotel wants to maintain a standard message
log operation for all received messages. It wants this operation to
be reusable across the whole reservation system, so each service
will send out, for potential use of a logging service, the content
of each message it receives together with a timestamp and the
originator of the message. One way to meet such requirement is to
define the log operation in an interface which can be inherited by
other interfaces. Assuming a <code>messageLog</code> element is
already defined in the ghns namespace with the required content,
the inheritance use case is illustrated in the following example.
As a result of the inheritance, the
<code>reservationInterface</code> now contains two operations:
<code>opCheckAvailability</code> and <code>opLogMessage</code></p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-faults" id="example-faults"></a><em><span>Example
2-11.</span> Interface Inheritance</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<description ...>
...
<interface name = "messageLogInterface" >
<operation name="opLogMessage"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-only">
<output messageLabel="out"
element="ghns:messageLog" />
</operation>
</interface>
<interface name="reservationInterface" <strong>extends</strong>="tns:messageLogInterface" >
<operation name="opCheckAvailability"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out"
style="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/iri"
wsdlx:safe = "true">
<input messageLabel="In"
element="ghns:checkAvailability" />
<output messageLabel="Out"
element="ghns:checkAvailabilityResponse" />
<outfault ref="tns:invalidDataFault" messageLabel="Out"/>
</operation>
</interface>
...
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>Now let's have a look at the element children of
<code>interface</code>, beginning with <code>fault</code>.</p>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="more-interfaces-faults" id=
"more-interfaces-faults"></a>2.4.3 Interface Faults</h4>
<p>The <code>fault</code> element is used to declare faults that
may occur during execution of operations of an interface. They are
declared directly under <code>interface</code>, and referenced from
operations where they apply, in order to permit reuse across
multiple operations.</p>
<p>Faults are very similar to messages and can be viewed as a
special kind of message. Both faults and messages may carry a
payload that is normally described by an element declaration.
However, WSDL 2.0 treats faults and messages slightly differently.
The messages of an operation directly refer to their element
declaration, however the faults of an operation indirectly refer to
their element declaration via a fault element that is defined on
the interface.</p>
<p>The reason for defining faults at the interface level is to
allow their reuse across multiple operations. This design is
especially beneficial when bindings are defined, since in binding
extensions like SOAP there is additional information that is
associated with faults. In the case of SOAP, faults have codes and
subcodes in addition to a payload. By defining faults at the
interface level, common codes and subcodes can be associated with
them, thereby ensuring consistency across all operations that use
the faults</p>
<p>The <code>fault</code> element has a required <code>name</code>
attribute that must be unique within the parent
<code>interface</code> element, and permits it to be referenced
from operation declarations. The optional <code>element</code>
attribute can be used to indicate a schema for the content or
payload of the fault message. Its value should be the QName of a
global element defined in the <code>types</code> section. Please
note that when other type systems are used to define the schema for
a fault message, additional attributes may need to be defined via
WSDL 2.0's attribute extension mechanism to allow the schema to be
associated with the fault.</p>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="more-interfaces-operations" id=
"more-interfaces-operations"></a>2.4.4 Interface Operations</h4>
<p>As shown earlier, the <code>operation</code> element is used to
indicate an operation supported by the containing interface. It
associates message schemas with a message exchange pattern (MEP),
in order to abstractly describe a simple interaction with a Web
service.</p>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="more-interfaces-op-attr" id=
"more-interfaces-op-attr"></a>2.4.4.1 Operation Attributes</h5>
<p>An <code>operation</code> has two required attributes and one
optional attribute:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>A required <code>name</code> attribute, as seen already, which
must be unique within the interface.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>A required <code>pattern</code> attribute whose value must be an
absolute URI that identifies the desired MEP for the
<code>operation</code>. MEPs are further explained in <a href=
"#more-interfaces-meps"><strong>2.4.4.3 Understanding Message
Exchange Patterns (MEPs)</strong></a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>An optional <code>style</code> attribute whose value is a list
of absolute URIs. Each URI identifies a certain set of rules that
were followed in defining this <code>operation</code>. It is an
error if a particular style is indicated, but the associated rules
are not followed. [<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0
Adjuncts</a></cite>] defines a set of styles, including</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>RPC Style. The RPC style is selected when the <code>style</code>
is assigned the value http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/rpc. It places
restrictions for Remote Procedure Call-types of interactions.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>IRI Style. The IRI style is selected when the <code>style</code>
is assigned the value http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/iri. It
places restrictions on message definitions so they may be
serialized into something like HTTP URL encoded.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The Multipart style. The Multipart style is selected when the
<code>style</code> is assigned the value
http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/multipart. In the HTTP binding, for
XForms clients, a message must be defined following the Multipart
style and serialized as "Multipart/form-data".</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>You can find more details of these WSDL 2.0 predefined styles.
Section <a href="#adv-RPCstyle"><strong>4.3 RPC Style</strong></a>
provides an example of using the RPC <code>style</code>.
[<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts</a></cite>] provides
examples for the IRI style and Multipart style.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Note that [<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0
Adjuncts</a></cite>] provides a predefined extension for indicating
operation safety. The <code>wsdlx:safe</code> global attribute
whose value is a boolean can be used with an operation to indicate
whether the operation is asserted to be "safe" (as defined in
Section 3.5 of the Web Architecture [<cite><a href="#webarch">Web
Architecture</a></cite>]) for clients to invoke. In essence, a safe
operation is any operation that does not give the client any new
obligations. For example, an operation that permits the client to
check prices on products typically would not obligate the client to
buy those products, and thus would be safe, whereas an operation
for purchasing products would obligate the client to pay for the
products that were ordered, and thus would not be safe.</p>
<p>An operation should be marked safe (by using the
<code>wsdlx:safe</code> and by setting its value to "true") if it
meets the criteria for a safe interaction defined in Section 3.5 of
the Web Architecture [<cite><a href="#webarch">Web
Architecture</a></cite>], because this permits the infrastructure
to perform efficiency optimizations, such as pre-fetch, re-fetch
and caching.</p>
<p>The default value of this attribute is false. If it is false or
is not set, then no assertion is made about the safety of the
operation; thus the operation may or may not be safe.</p>
</div>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="id2295836" id="id2295836"></a>2.4.4.2 Operation
Message References</h5>
<p>An <code>operation</code> will also have <code>input</code>,
<code>output</code>,<code>infault</code>, and/or
<code>outfault</code> element children that specify the ordinary
and fault message types to be used by that operation. The MEP
specified by the <code>pattern</code> attribute determines which of
these elements should be included, since each MEP has placeholders
for the message types involved in its pattern.</p>
<p>Since operations were already discussed in <a href=
"#basics-interface"><strong>2.1.4 Defining an
Interface</strong></a>, this section will merely comment on
additional capabilities that were not previously explained.</p>
<div class="div5">
<h6><a name="id2295901" id="id2295901"></a>2.4.4.2.1 The
messageLabel Attribute</h6>
<p>The <code>messageLabel</code> attribute of the
<code>input</code> and <code>output</code> elements is optional. It
is not necessary to explicitly set the <code>messageLabel</code>
when the MEP in use is one of the eight MEPs predefined in WSDL 2.0
Part 2 [<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts</a></cite>]
and it has only one message with a given direction.</p>
</div>
<div class="div5">
<h6><a name="id2295952" id="id2295952"></a>2.4.4.2.2 The element
Attribute</h6>
<p>The <code>element</code> attribute of the <code>input</code> and
<code>output</code> elements is used to specify the message content
schema (aka payload schema) when the content model is defined using
XML Schema. As we have seen already, it can specify the QName of an
element schema that was defined in the <code>types</code> section.
However, alternatively it can specify one of the following
tokens:</p>
<dl>
<dt class="label"><code>#any</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>The message content is any single element.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code>#none</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>There is no message content, i.e., the message payload is
empty.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code>#other</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>The message content is described by a non-XML type system.
Extension attributes specify the type.</p>
</dd>
</dl>
<p>The <code>element</code> attribute is also optional. If it is
not specified, then the message content is described by a non-XML
type system.</p>
<p>Note that there are situations that the information conveyed in
the <code>element</code> attribute is not sufficient for a service
implementation to uniquely identify an incoming message and
dispatch it to an appropriate operation. In such situations,
additional means may be required to aid identifying an incoming
message. See <a href="#adv-message-dispatch"><strong>5.1 Enabling
Easy Message Dispatch</strong></a> for more detail.</p>
</div>
<div class="div5">
<h6><a name="id2296126" id="id2296126"></a>2.4.4.2.3 Multiple
infault or outfault Elements</h6>
<p>When <code>infault</code> and/or <code>outfault</code> occur
multiple times within an <code>operation</code>, they define
alternative fault messages.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="more-interfaces-meps" id=
"more-interfaces-meps"></a>2.4.4.3 Understanding Message Exchange
Patterns (MEPs)</h5>
<p>WSDL 2.0 message exchange patterns (MEPs) are used to define the
sequence and cardinality of the abstract messages in an operation.
By design, WSDL 2.0 MEPs are abstract. First of all, they abstract
out specific message types. MEPs identify placeholders for
messages, and placeholders are associated with specific message
types when an operation is defined, which includes specifying which
MEP to use for that operation. Secondly, unless explicitly stated
otherwise, MEPs also abstract out binding-specific information like
timing between messages, whether the pattern is synchronous or
asynchronous, and whether the messages are sent over a single or
multiple channels.</p>
<p>It's worth pointing out that WSDL 2.0 MEPs do not exhaustively
describe the set of messages that may be exchanged between a
service and other nodes. By some prior agreement, another node
and/or the service may send other messages (to each other or to
other nodes) that are not described by the MEP. For instance, even
though an MEP may define a single message sent from a service to
one other node, a service defined by that MEP may multicast that
message to other nodes. To maximize reuse, WSDL 2.0 message
exchange patterns identify a minimal contract between other parties
and Web Services, and contain only information that is relevant to
both the Web service and the client that engages that service.</p>
<p>A total of eight MEPs are defined in [<cite><a href=
"#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts</a></cite>]. These MEPs should
cover the most common use cases, but they are not meant to be an
exhaustive list of MEPs that can ever be used by operations. More
MEPs can be defined for particular application needs by interested
parties. (See <a href="#more-interfaces-meps"><strong>2.4.4.3
Understanding Message Exchange Patterns (MEPs)</strong></a> )</p>
<p>For the eight MEPs defined by WSDL 2.0, some of them are
variations of others based on how faults may be generated. For
example, the In-Only pattern ("http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-only")
consists of exactly one message received by a service from some
other node. No fault can be generated. As a variation of In-Only,
Robust In-Only pattern ("http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/robust-in-only")
also consists of exactly one message received by a service, but in
this case faults can be triggered by the message and must be
delivered to the originator of the message. If there is no path to
this node, the fault must be discarded. For details about the
common fault generation models used by the eight WSDL 2.0 MEPs, see
[<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts</a></cite>].</p>
<p>Depending on how the first message in the MEP is initiated, the
eight WSDL 2.0 MEPs may be grouped into two groups: in-bound MEPs,
for which the service receives the first message in the exchange,
and out-bound MEPs, for which the service sends out the first
message in the exchange. (Such grouping is not provided in the WSDL
2.0 specification and is presented here only for the purpose of
easy reference in this primer).</p>
<p>A frequently asked question about out-bound MEPs is how a
service knows where to send the message. Services using out-bound
MEPs are typically part of large scale integration systems that
rely on mapping and routing facilities. In such systems, out-bound
MEPs are useful for specifying the functionality of a service
abstractly, including its requirements for potential customers,
while endpoint address information can be provided at deployment or
runtime by the underlying integration infrastructure. For example,
the GreatH hotel reservation system may require that every time a
customer interacts with the system to check availability, data
about the customer must be logged by a CRM system. At design time,
it's unknown which particular CRM system would be used together
with the reservation system. To address this requirement, we may
change the "reservationInterface" in <a href=
"#example-initial">Example 2-1</a> to include an out-bound
logInquiry operation. This <code>logInquiry</code> operation
advertises to potential service clients that customer data will be
made available by the reservation service at run time. When the
reservation service is deployed to GreatH's IT landscape,
appropriate configuration time and run time infrastructure will
help determine which CRM system will get the customer data and log
it appropriately. It's worth noting that in addition to being used
by a CRM system for customer management purpose, the same data may
also be used by a system performance analysis tool for different
purpose. Providing an out-bound operation in the reservation
service enables loose coupling and so improves the overall GreatH
IT landscape's flexibility and scalability.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-outbound-operation" id=
"example-outbound-operation"></a><em><span>Example 2-12.</span> Use
of outbound MEPs</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<description ...>
...
<interface name="reservationInterface">
...
<operation name="opCheckAvailability" ... >
<operation name="opLogInquiry"
<strong>pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-only"</strong>>
<<strong>output messageLabel="Out" element="ghns:customerData"</strong> />
</operation>
</interface>
...
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>Although the eight MEPs defined in WSDL 2.0 Part 2
[<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts</a></cite>] are
intended to cover most use cases, WSDL 2.0 has designed this set to
be extensible. This is why MEPs are identified by URIs rather than
a fixed set of tokens.</p>
<p>For more about defining new MEPs, see <a href=
"#adv-MEP"><strong>4.2 Defining New MEPs</strong></a>.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="more-bindings" id="more-bindings"></a>2.5 More on
Bindings</h3>
<p>Bindings are used to supply protocol and encoding details that
specify <em>how</em> messages are to be sent or received. Each
<code>binding</code> element uses a particular <em>binding
extension</em> to specify such information. WSDL 2.0 Part 2
[<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts</a></cite>] defines
several binding extensions that are typically used. However,
binding extensions that are not defined in WSDL 2.0 Part 2 can also
be used, provided that client and service toolkits support
them.</p>
<p>Binding information must be supplied for every operation in the
interface that is used in an endpoint. However, if the desired
binding extension provides suitable defaulting rules, then the
information will only need to be explicitly supplied at the
interface level, and the defaulting rules will implicitly propagate
the information to the operations of the interface. For example,
see the <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-adjuncts-20070626#soap-defaults">
Default Binding Rules</a> of SOAP binding extension in WSDL 2.0
Part 2 [<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0
Adjuncts</a></cite>].</p>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="more-bindings-wsdl" id="more-bindings-wsdl"></a>2.5.1
Syntax Summary for Bindings</h4>
<p>Since bindings are specified using extensions to the WSDL 2.0
language (i.e., binding extensions are not in the WSDL 2.0
namespace), the XML for expressing a binding will consist of a
mixture of elements and attributes from WSDL 2.0 namespace and from
the binding extension's namespace, using WSDL 2.0's open content
model.</p>
<p>Here is a syntax summary for <code>binding</code>, simplified by
omitting optional <code>documentation</code> elements. Bear in mind
that this syntax summary only shows the elements and attributes
defined within the WSDL 2.0 namespace. When an actual binding is
defined, elements and attributes from the namespace of the desired
binding extension will also be intermingled as required by that
particular binding extension.</p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<description targetNamespace="<em>xs:anyURI</em>" >
. . .
<<strong>binding</strong> name="<em>xs:NCName</em>" interface="<em>xs:QName</em>"? >
<fault ref="<em>xs:QName</em>" > </fault>*
<operation ref="<em>xs:QName</em>" >
<input messageLabel="<em>xs:NCName</em>"? > </input>*
<output messageLabel="<em>xs:NCName</em>"? > </output>*
<infault ref="<em>xs:QName</em>" messageLabel="<em>xs:NCName</em>"? > </infault>*
<outfault ref="<em>xs:QName</em>" messageLabel="<em>xs:NCName</em>"? > </outfault>*
</operation>*
</<strong>binding</strong>>*
. . .
</description>
</pre></div>
<p>The <code>binding</code> syntax parallels the syntax of
<code>interface</code>: each interface construct has a binding
counterpart. Despite this syntactic similarity, they are indeed
different constructs, since they are in different symbol spaces and
are designed for different purposes.</p>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="more-bindings-reusable" id=
"more-bindings-reusable"></a>2.5.2 Reusable Bindings</h4>
<p>A binding can either be reusable (applicable to any interface)
or non-reusable (specified for a particular interface).
Non-reusable bindings may be specified at the granularity of the
interface (assuming the binding extension provides suitable
defaulting rules), or on a per-operation basis if needed. A
non-reusable binding was demonstrated in <a href=
"#basics-binding"><strong>2.1.5 Defining a
Binding</strong></a>.</p>
<p>To define a reusable binding, the <code>binding</code> element
simply omits the <code>interface</code> attribute and omits
specifying any operation-specific and fault-specific binding
details. Endpoints can later refer to a reusable binding in the
same manner as for a non-reusable binding. Thus, a reusable binding
becomes associated with a particular interface when it is
referenced from an endpoint, because an endpoint is part of a
service, and the service specifies a particular interface that it
implements. Since a reusable binding does not specify an interface,
reusable bindings cannot specify operation-specific details.
Therefore, reusable bindings can only be defined using binding
extensions that have suitable defaulting rules, such that the
binding information only needs to be explicitly supplied at the
interface level.</p>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="more-bindings-faults" id=
"more-bindings-faults"></a>2.5.3 Binding Faults</h4>
<p>A binding <code>fault</code> associates a concrete message
format with an abstract fault of an interface. It describes how
faults that occur within a message exchange of an operation will be
formatted, since the fault does not occur by itself. Rather, a
fault occurs as part of a message exchange specified by an
interface <code>operation</code> and its binding counterpart, the
binding <code>operation</code>.</p>
<p>A binding <code>fault</code> has one required <code>ref</code>
attribute which is a reference, by QName, to an
<code>interface</code> <code>fault</code>. It identifies the
abstract interface <code>fault</code> for which binding information
is being specified. Be aware that the value of <code>ref</code>
attribute of all the <code>faults</code> under a
<code>binding</code> must be unique. That is, one cannot define
multiple bindings for the same interface fault within a given
<code>binding</code>.</p>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="bindingOperations" id="bindingOperations"></a>2.5.4
Binding Operations</h4>
<p>A binding <code>operation</code> describes a concrete binding of
an interface operation to a concrete message format. An interface
operation is uniquely identified by the WSDL 2.0 target namespace
of the interface and the name of the operation within that
interface, via the required <code>ref</code> attribute of binding
<code>operation</code>. As with faults, for each
<code>operation</code> within a <code>binding</code>, the value of
the <code>ref</code> attribute must be unique.</p>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="more-bindings-soap" id="more-bindings-soap"></a>2.5.5
The SOAP Binding Extension</h4>
<p>The WSDL 2.0 SOAP Binding Extension (see WSDL 2.0 Part 2
[<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts</a></cite>]) was
primarily designed to support the features of SOAP 1.2
[<cite><a href="#SOAP12-PART1">SOAP 1.2 Part 1: Messaging
Framework</a></cite>]. However, for backwards compatibility, it
also provides some support for SOAP 1.1 [<cite><a href=
"#SOAP11">SOAP 1.1</a></cite>].</p>
<p>An example using the WSDL 2.0 SOAP binding extension was already
presented in <a href="#basics-binding"><strong>2.1.5 Defining a
Binding</strong></a>, but some additional points are worth
mentioning:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Because the same binding extension is used for both SOAP 1.2 and
SOAP 1.1, a <code>wsoap:version</code> attribute is provided to
allow you to indicate which version of SOAP you want. If this
attribute is not specified, it defaults to SOAP 1.2.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The WSDL 2.0 SOAP binding extension defines a set of default
rules, so that bindings can be specified at the interface level or
at the operation level (or both), with the operation level taking
precedence. However, it does not define default binding rules for
faults. Thus, if a given interface defines any faults, then
corresponding binding information must be explicitly provided for
each such fault.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>If HTTP is used as the underlying protocol, then the binding can
(and should) control whether each operation will use HTTP GET or
POST. (See <a href="#adv-get-vs-post"><strong>2.5.7 HTTP GET Versus
POST: Which to Use?</strong></a>.)</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Here is an example that illustrates both a SOAP 1.2 binding (as
seen before) and a SOAP 1.1 binding.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-binding-soap" id=
"example-binding-soap"></a><em><span>Example 2-13.</span> SOAP 1.2
and SOAP 1.1 Bindings</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
xmlns:tns="http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
xmlns:ghns="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc"
xmlns:wsoap="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap"
xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope"
xmlns:soap11="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
....
<!-- SOAP 1.2 Binding -->
<binding name="reservationSOAPBinding"
interface="tns:reservationInterface"
type="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap"
wsoap:protocol="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/">
<operation ref="tns:opCheckAvailability"
wsoap:mep="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request-response"/>
<fault ref="tns:invalidDataFault"
wsoap:code="soap:Sender"/>
</binding>
<!-- SOAP 1.1 Binding -->
<binding name="reservationSOAP11Binding"
interface="tns:reservationInterface"
type="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap"
wsoap:version="1.1"
wsoap:protocol="http://www.w3.org/2006/01/soap11/bindings/HTTP/">
<operation ref="tns:opCheckAvailability"/>
<fault ref="tns:invalidDataFault"
wsoap:code="soap11:Client"/>
</binding>
<service name="reservationService"
interface="tns:reservationInterface">
<!-- SOAP 1.2 End Point -->
<endpoint name="reservationEndpoint"
binding="tns:reservationSOAPBinding"
address="http://greath.example.com/2004/reservation"/>
<!-- SOAP 1.1 End Point -->
<endpoint name="reservationEndpoint2"
binding="tns:reservationSOAP11Binding"
address="http://greath.example.com/2004/reservation"/>
</service>
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="more-bindings-soap-example-explanation" id=
"more-bindings-soap-example-explanation"></a>2.5.5.1 Explanation of
Example</h5>
<p>Most lines in this example is the same as previously explained
in <a href="#basics-binding"><strong>2.1.5 Defining a
Binding</strong></a>, so we'll only point out lines that are
demonstrating something new for SOAP 1.1 binding.</p>
<dl>
<dt class="label"><code><description ...
xmlns:soap11="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"></code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This is the namespace for terms defined within the SOAP 1.1
specification [<cite><a href="#SOAP11">SOAP 1.1</a></cite>].</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label">
<code><binding...wsoap:version="1.1"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This line indicates that this binding uses SOAP 1.1
[<cite><a href="#WSDL-SOAP11">WSDL 2.0 SOAP 1.1
Binding</a></cite>], rather than SOAP 1.2.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label">
<code>wsoap:protocol="http://www.w3.org/2006/01/soap11/bindings/HTTP/"></code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This line specifies that HTTP should be used as the underlying
transmission protocol. See also <a href=
"#adv-get-vs-post"><strong>2.5.7 HTTP GET Versus POST: Which to
Use?</strong></a>.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code><operation
ref="tns:opCheckAvailability"/></code></dt>
<dd>
<p>Note that <code>wsoap:mep</code> is not applicable to SOAP 1.1
binding.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label">
<code><fault...wsoap:code="soap11:Client"/></code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This line specifies the SOAP 1.1 fault code that will be used in
transmitting invalidDataFault.</p>
</dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="more-bindings-http" id="more-bindings-http"></a>2.5.6
The HTTP Binding Extension</h4>
<p>In addition to the WSDL 2.0 SOAP binding extension described
above, WSDL 2.0 Part 2 [<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0
Adjuncts</a></cite>] defines a binding extension for HTTP 1.1
[<cite><a href="#RFC2616">IETF RFC 2616</a></cite>] and HTTPS
[<cite><a href="#RFC2818">IETF RFC 2818</a></cite>], so that these
protocols can be used natively to send and receive messages,
without first encoding them in SOAP.</p>
<p>The HTTP binding extension provides many features to
control:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>Which HTTP operation will be used. (GET, PUT, POST, DELETE, and
other HTTP operations are supported.)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Input, output and fault serialization</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Transfer codings</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Authentication requirements</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Cookies</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>HTTP over TLS (https)</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>As with the WSDL 2.0 SOAP binding extension, the HTTP binding
extension also provides defaulting rules to permit binding
information to be specified at the interface level and used by
default for each operation in the affected interface, however,
defaulting rules are not provided for binding faults.</p>
<p>Here is an example of using the HTTP binding extension to check
hotel room availability at GreatH.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-bindings-http" id=
"example-bindings-http"></a><em><span>Example 2-14.</span> HTTP
Binding Extension</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
. . .
xmlns:whttp="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/http" >
. . .
<binding name="reservationHTTPBinding"
interface="tns:reservationInterface"
type="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/http"
whttp:methodDefault="GET">
<operation ref="tns:opCheckAvailability"
whttp:location="{checkInDate}" />
</binding>
<service name="reservationService"
interface="tns:reservationInterface">
<!-- HTTP 1.1 GET End Point -->
<endpoint name="reservationEndpoint"
binding="tns:reservationHTTPBinding"
address="http://greath.example.com/2004/checkAvailability/"/>
</service>
. . .
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="id2297429" id="id2297429"></a>2.5.6.1 Explanation of
Example</h5>
<p>Most of this example is the same as previously explained in
<a href="#basics-binding"><strong>2.1.5 Defining a
Binding</strong></a>, so we'll only point out lines that are
demonstrating something new for HTTP binding extension.</p>
<dl>
<dt class="label">
<code><description...xmlns:whttp="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/http"
></code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This defines the namespace prefix for elements and attributes
defined by the WSDL 2.0 HTTP binding extension.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label">
<code><binding...type="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/http"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>This declares the binding as being an HTTP binding.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code>whttp:methodDefault="GET"></code></dt>
<dd>
<p>The default method for operations in this interface will be HTTP
GET.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code>whttp:location="{checkInDate}"
></code></dt>
<dd>
<p>The <code>whttp:location</code> attribute specifies a pattern
for serializing input message instance data into the path component
of the request URI. The default binding rules for HTTP specify that
the default input serialization for GET is
<code>application/x-www-form-urlencoded</code>. Curly braces are
used to specify the name of a schema type in the input message
schema, which determines what input instance data will be inserted
into the path component of the request URI. The curly
brace-enclosed name will be replaced with instance data in
constructing the path component. Remaining input instance data (not
specified by <code>whttp:location</code>) will either be serialized
into the query string portion of the URI or into the message body,
as follows: if a "/" is appended to a curly brace-enclosed type
name, then any remaining input message instance data will be
serialized into the message body. Otherwise it will be serialized
into query parameters.</p>
<p>Thus, in this example, each of the elements in the
<code>tCheckAvailability</code> type will be serialized into the
query parameters. A sample resulting URI would therefore be
<code>http://greath.example.com/2004/checkAvailability/5-5-5?checkOutDate=6-6-5&roomType=foo</code>.</p>
</dd>
</dl>
<p>Here is an alternate example that appends "/" to the type name
in order to serialize the remaining instance data into the message
body:</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-bindings-http-path-subsset" id=
"example-bindings-http-path-subsset"></a><em><span>Example
2-15.</span> Serializing a Subset of Types in the Path</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
. . .
<operation ref="tns:opCheckAvailability"
whttp:location="bycheckInDate/{checkInDate/}" >
. . .
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>This would instead serialize to a request URI such as:
<code>http://greath.example.com/2004/checkAvailability/bycheckInDate/5-5-5</code>.
The rest of the message content would go to the HTTP message
body.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="adv-get-vs-post" id="adv-get-vs-post"></a>2.5.7 HTTP
GET Versus POST: Which to Use?</h4>
<p>When a binding using HTTP is specified for an operation, the
WSDL 2.0 author must decide which HTTP method is appropriate to use
-- usually a choice between GET and POST. In the context of the Web
as a whole (rather than specifically Web services), the W3C
Technical Architecture Group (TAG) has addressed the question of
when it is appropriate to use GET, versus when to use POST, in a
finding entitled <em>URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET
and POST</em> ([<cite><a href="#TAG-whenToUseGET">W3C TAG Finding:
Use of HTTP GET</a></cite>]). From the abstract:</p>
<p>"<em>. . . designers should adopt [GET] for safe operations such
as simple queries. POST is appropriate for other types of
applications where a user request has the potential to change the
state of the resource (or of related resources). The finding
explains how to choose between HTTP GET and POST for an application
taking into account architectural, security, and practical
considerations.</em>"</p>
<p>Recall that the concept of a safe operation was discussed in
<a href="#more-interfaces-op-attr"><strong>2.4.4.1 Operation
Attributes</strong></a>. (Briefly, a safe operation is one that
does not cause the invoker to incur new obligations.) Although the
<code>wsdlx:safe</code> attribute of an interface operation
indicates that the abstract operation is safe, it does not
automatically cause GET to be used at the HTTP level when the
binding is specified. The choice of GET or POST is determined at
the binding level:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>If the WSDL 2.0 SOAP binding extension is used (<a href=
"#more-bindings-soap"><strong>2.5.5 The SOAP Binding
Extension</strong></a>), with HTTP as the underlying transport
protocol, then GET may be specified by setting:</p>
<dl>
<dt class="label">
<code>wsoap:protocol="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>on the <code>binding</code> element (to indicate the use of HTTP
as the underlying protocol); and</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label">
<code>wsoap:mep="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/soap-response/"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>on the binding <code>operation</code> element, which causes GET
to be used by default.</p>
</dd>
</dl>
</li>
<li>
<p>If the WSDL 2.0 HTTP binding extension is used directly
(<a href="#more-bindings-http"><strong>2.5.6 The HTTP Binding
Extension</strong></a>), GET may be specified by setting
either:</p>
<dl>
<dt class="label"><code>whttp:methodDefault="GET"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>on the <code>binding</code> element; or</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code>whttp:method="GET"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>on the binding <code>operation</code> element, which overrides
<code>whttp:methodDefault</code> if set on the <code>binding</code>
element; or</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label"><code>wsdlx:safe="true"</code></dt>
<dd>
<p>on the bound <code>interface operation</code> . When the above
two items are not explicitly set, and when the bound interface
operation is marked safe, the HTTP Binding will by default set the
method to GET.</p>
</dd>
</dl>
</li>
</ul>
<p>For example, in the GreatH interface definition shown in
<a href="#example-initial-interface">Example 2-4</a>, the
wsdlx:safe attribute is set to "true". The HTTP binding definition
in <a href="#example-bindings-http">Example 2-14</a> may take
advantage of that and be simplified as below and still have the
http method set to GET by default:</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-binding-safety" id=
"example-binding-safety"></a><em><span>Example 2-16.</span> Safety
and HTTP Binding</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<binding name="reservationHTTPBinding"
interface="tns:reservationInterface"
type="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/http" >
<operation ref="tns:opCheckAvailability"
whttp:location="{checkInDate}"/>
</binding>
</pre></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div1">
<h2><a name="advanced-topic_ii" id="advanced-topic_ii"></a>3.
Advanced Topics I: Importing Mechanisms</h2>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="adv-import-and-authoring" id=
"adv-import-and-authoring"></a>3.1 Importing WSDL</h3>
<p>In some circumstances WSDL authors may want to split up a Web
service description into two or more documents. For example, if a
description is getting long or is being developed by several
authors, then it is convenient to divide it into several parts.
Another very important case is when you expect parts of the
description to be reused in several contexts. Clearly it is
undesirable to cut and paste sections of one document into another,
since that is error prone and leads to maintenance problems. More
importantly, you may need to reuse components that belong to a
wsdl:targetNamespace that is different than that of the document
you are writing, in which case the rules of WSDL 2.0 prevent you
from simply cutting and pasting them into your document.</p>
<p>To solve these problems, WSDL 2.0 provides two mechanisms for
modularizing Web service description documents: <code>import</code>
and <code>include</code>. This section discusses the import
mechanism and describes some typical cases where it may be
used.</p>
<p>The <code>import</code> mechanism lets one refer to the
definitions of Web service components that belong to other
namespaces. To illustrate this, consider the GreatH hotel
reservation service. Suppose that the reservation service uses a
standard credit card validation service that is provided by a
financial services company. Furthermore, suppose that companies in
the financial services industry decided that it would be useful to
report errors in credit card validation using a common set of
faults, and have defined these faults in the following Web service
description:</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"credit-card-faults" id="credit-card-faults"></a><em><span>Example
3-1.</span> Standard Credit Card Validation Faults
(credit-card-faults.wsdl)</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
targetNamespace="http://finance.example.com/CreditCards/wsdl"
xmlns:tns="http://finance.example.com/CreditCards/wsdl"
xmlns:cc="http://finance.example.com/CreditCards/xsd">
<documentation>
This document describes standard faults for use
by Web services that process credit cards.
</documentation>
<types>
<xs:import xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
namespace="http://finance.example.com/CreditCardFaults/xsd"
schemaLocation="credit-card-faults.xsd" />
</types>
<interface name="creditCardFaults">
<fault name="cancelledCreditCard" element="cc:CancelledCreditCard">
<documentation>Thrown when the credit card has been cancelled.</documentation>
</fault>
<fault name="expiredCreditCard" element="cc:ExpiredCreditCard">
<documentation>Thrown when the credit card has expired.</documentation>
</fault>
<fault name="invalidCreditCardNumber" element="cc:InvalidCreditCardNumber">
<documentation>Thrown when the credit card number is invalid.
This fault will occur if the wrong credit card type is specified.
</documentation>
</fault>
<fault name="invalidExpirationDate" element="cc:InvalidExpirationDate">
<documentation>Thrown when the expiration date is invalid.</documentation>
</fault>
</interface>
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>This example defines an interface,
<code>creditCardFaults</code>, that contains four faults,
<code>cancelledCreditCard</code>, <code>expiredCreditCard</code>,
<code>invalidCreditCardNumber</code>, and
<code>invalidExpirationDate</code>. These components belong to the
namespace
<code>http://finance.example.com/CreditCards/wsdl</code>.</p>
<p>Because these faults are defined in a different
wsdl:targetNamespace than the one used by the GreatH Web service
description, import must be used to make them available within the
GreatH Web service description, as shown in the following
example:</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"use-credit-card-faults" id=
"use-credit-card-faults"></a><em><span>Example 3-2.</span> Using
the Standard Credit Card Validation Faults
(use-credit-card-faults.wsdl)</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<description
targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc"
xmlns:ghns="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/resSvc"
xmlns:cc="http://finance.example.com/CreditCards/wsdl"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<documentation>
Description: The definition of the reservation Web service of
GreatH hotel. Author: Joe Somebody Date: 05/17/2004
</documentation>
<import namespace="http://finance.example.com/CreditCards/wsdl"
location="credit-card-faults.wsdl"/>
. . .
<interface name="reservation" extends="cc:creditCardFaults">
. . .
<operation name="makeReservation"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out">
<input messageLabel="In" element="ghns:makeReservation" />
<output messageLabel="Out"
element="ghns:makeReservationResponse" />
<outfault ref="invalidDataFault" messageLabel="Out" />
<outfault ref="cc:cancelledCreditCard" messageLabel="Out" />
<outfault ref="cc:expiredCreditCard" messageLabel="Out" />
<outfault ref="cc:invalidCreditCardNumber" messageLabel="Out" />
<outfault ref="cc:invalidExpirationDate" messageLabel="Out" />
</operation>
</interface>
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>The hotel reservation service declares that it is using
components from another namespace via the <code>import</code>>
element. The import element has a required <code>namespace</code>
attribute that specifies the other namespace, and an optional
<code>location</code> attribute that gives the processor a hint
where to find the description of the other namespace. The
<code>reservation</code> interface extends the
<code>creditCardFault</code> interface from the other namespace in
order to make the faults available in the reservation interface.
Finally, the <code>makeReservation</code> operation refers to the
standard faults in its <code>outfault</code> elements.</p>
<p>Another typical situation for using imports is to define a
standard interface that is to be implemented by many services. For
example, suppose the hotel industry decided that it was useful to
have a standard interface for making reservations. This interface
would belong to some industry association namespace, e.g.
<code>http://hotels.example.com/reservations/wsdl</code>. Each
hotel that implemented the standard reservation service would
define a service in its own namespace, e.g.
<code>http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/resSvc</code>. The
description of each service would import the
<code>http://hotels.example.com/reservations/wsdl</code> namespace
and refer to the standard reservation interface in it.</p>
</div>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="adv-multiple-inline-schemas" id=
"adv-multiple-inline-schemas"></a>3.2 Importing Schemas</h3>
<p>WSDL 2.0 documents may contain one or more XML schemas defined
within the <code>wsdl:types</code> element. This section
illustrates the correct way to refer to these schemas, both from
within the same document and from other documents.</p>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="id2298427" id="id2298427"></a>3.2.1 Schemas in
Imported Documents</h4>
<p>In this example, we consider some GreatH Hotel Web services that
retrieve and update reservation details. The retrieval Web service
is defined in the <code>retrieveDetails.wsdl</code> WSDL 2.0
document, along with a schema for the message format. The updating
Web service is defined in the <code>updateDetails.wsdl</code> WSDL
2.0 document which imports the first document and refers to both
WSDL 2.0 and schema definitions contained in the imported
document.</p>
<p><a href="#retrieveDetails.wsdl">Example 3-3</a> shows the
definition of the retrieval Web service in the
<code>http://greath.example.com/2004/services/retrieveDetails</code>
namespace. This WSDL 2.0 document also contains an inline schema
that describes the reservation detail in the
<code>http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails</code>
namespace. This schema is visible to the
<code>retrieveDetailsInterface</code> interface definition which
refers to it in the <code>retrieve</code> operation's output
message.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"retrieveDetails.wsdl" id=
"retrieveDetails.wsdl"></a><em><span>Example 3-3.</span> The
Retrieve Reservation Details Web Service:
retrieveDetails.wsdl</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/services/retrieveDetails"
xmlns:tns="http://greath.example.com/2004/services/retrieveDetails"
xmlns:wdetails="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<documentation>
This document describes the GreatH Retrieve Reservation Details
Web service.
</documentation>
<types>
<xs:schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails">
<xs:element name="reservationDetails">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="confirmationNumber"
type="string" />
<xs:element name="checkInDate" type="date" />
<xs:element name="checkOutDate" type="date" />
<xs:element name="roomType" type="string" />
<xs:element name="smoking" type="boolean" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
</xs:schema>
</types>
<interface name="retrieveDetailsInterface">
<operation name="retrieve"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out">
<input messageLabel="In" element="#none" />
<output messageLabel="Out"
element="wdetails:reservationDetails" />
</operation>
</interface>
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p><a href="#updateDetails.wsdl">Example 3-4</a> shows the
definition of the updating Web service in the
<code>http://greath.example.com/2004/services/updateDetails</code>
namespace. The <code>updateDetailsInterface</code> interface
extends the <code>retrieveDetailsInterface</code> interface.
However, the <code>retrieveDetailsInterface</code> belongs to the
<code>http://greath.example.com/2004/services/retrieveDetails</code>
namespace, so <code>updateDetails.wsdl</code> must import
<code>retrieveDetails.wsdl</code> to make that namespace
visible.</p>
<p>The <code>updateDetailsInterface</code> interface also uses the
<code>reservationDetails</code> element definition that is
contained in the inline schema of the imported
<code>retrieveDetails.wsdl</code> document. However, this schema is
not automatically visible within the
<code>updateDetails.wsdl</code> document. To make it visible, the
<code>updateDetails.wsdl</code> document must import the namespace
of the inline schema within the <code>types</code> element using
the XML schema <code>import</code> element.</p>
<p>In this example, the <code>schemaLocation</code> attribute of
the <code>import</code> element has been omitted. The
<code>schemaLocation</code> attribute is a hint to the WSDL 2.0
processor that tells it where to look for the imported schema
namespace. However, the WSDL 2.0 processor has already processed
the <code>retrieveDetails.wsdl</code> document which contains the
imported namespace in an inline schema so it should not need any
hints. However, this behavior depends on the implementation of the
processor and so cannot be relied on.</p>
<p>Although the WSDL 2.0 document may validly omit the
<code>schemaLocation</code> attribute, it is a best practice to
either provide a reliable value for it or move the inline schema
into a separate document, say <code>reservationDetails.xsd</code>,
and directly import it in the <code>types</code> element of both
<code>retrieveDetails.wsdl</code> and
<code>updateDetails.wsdl</code>. In general, schemas that are
expected to be referenced from more than one WSDL 2.0 document
should be defined in a separate schema document rather than be
inlined.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"updateDetails.wsdl" id="updateDetails.wsdl"></a><em><span>Example
3-4.</span> The Update Reservation Details Web Service:
updateDetails.wsdl</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/services/updateDetails"
xmlns:tns="http://greath.example.com/2004/services/updateetails"
xmlns:retrieve="http://greath.example.com/2004/services/retrieveDetails"
xmlns:details="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<documentation>
This document describes the GreatH Update Reservation Details
Web service.
</documentation>
<import
namespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/services/retrieveDetails"
location="retrieveDetails.wsdl" />
<types>
<xs:import
namespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails" />
</types>
<interface name="updateDetailsInterface"
extends="retrieve:retrieveDetailsInterface">
<operation name="update"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out">
<input messageLabel="In"
element="details:reservationDetails" />
<output messageLabel="Out"
element="details:reservationDetails" />
</operation>
</interface>
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="id2298802" id="id2298802"></a>3.2.2 Multiple Inline
Schemas in One Document</h4>
<p>A WSDL 2.0 document may define multiple inline schemas in its
<code>types</code> element. The two or more schemas may have the
same target namespace provided that they do not define the same
elements or types. It is an error to define the same element or
type more than once, even if the definitions are identical.</p>
<p>Each namespace of an inline schema becomes visible to the Web
service definitions. However, the namespaces are not automatically
visible to the other inline schemas. Each inline schema must
explicitly import any other namespace it references. The
<code>schemaLocation</code> attribute is not required in this case
since the WSDL 2.0 processor knows the location of each schema by
virtue of having processed the enclosing WSDL 2.0 document.</p>
<p>To illustrate this, consider <a href=
"#retrieveItems.wsdl">Example 3-5</a> which contains two inline
schemas. The
<code>http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationItems</code>
namespace contains some elements for items that appear in the
reservation details. The
<code>http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails</code>
namespace contains the <code>reservationDetails</code> element
which refers to the item elements. The schema for the
<code>http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails</code>
namespace contains an <code>import</code> element that imports the
<code>http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationItems</code>
namespace. No <code>schemaLocation</code> attribute is required for
this import since the schema is defined inline in the importing
document.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"retrieveItems.wsdl" id="retrieveItems.wsdl"></a><em><span>Example
3-5.</span> Multiple Inline Schemas: retrieveItems.wsdl</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/services/retrieveDetails"
xmlns:tns="http://greath.example.com/2004/services/retrieveDetails"
xmlns:wdetails="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<documentation>
This document describes the GreatH Retrieve Reservation Details
Web service.
</documentation>
<types>
<xs:schema targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationItems">
<xs:element name="confirmationNumber" type="string" />
<xs:element name="checkInDate" type="date" />
<xs:element name="checkOutDate" type="date" />
<xs:element name="roomType" type="string" />
<xs:element name="smoking" type="boolean" />
</xs:schema>
<xs:schema targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails"
xmlns:items="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationItems">
<xs:import
namespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationItems" />
<xs:element name="reservationDetails">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element ref="items:confirmationNumber" />
<xs:element ref="items:checkInDate" />
<xs:element ref="items:checkOutDate" />
<xs:element ref="items:roomType" />
<xs:element ref="items:smoking" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
</xs:schema>
</types>
<interface name="retrieveDetailsInterface">
<operation name="retrieve"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out">
<input messageLabel="In" element="#none" />
<output messageLabel="Out"
element="wdetails:reservationDetails" />
</operation>
</interface>
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="adv-schema-location" id=
"adv-schema-location"></a>3.2.3 The schemaLocation Attribute</h4>
<p>In the preceding examples, schemas were defined inline in WSDL
2.0 documents. This section discusses the correct way to specify a
<code>schemaLocation</code> attribute on a schema
<code>import</code> element to provide a processor with a hint for
locating these schemas.</p>
<p><a href="#updateDetails.wsdl">Example 3-4</a> shows how one WSDL
2.0 document imports a schema defined in another, i.e. <a href=
"#retrieveDetails.wsdl">Example 3-3</a>. Similarly, <a href=
"#retrieveItems.wsdl">Example 3-5</a> shows how one schema in a
WSDL 2.0 document imports another schema defined in the same
document. In both of these examples, the
<code>schemaLocation</code> attribute was omitted since the WSDL
2.0 processor was assumed to know how to locate the imported
schemas because they were part of the WSDL 2.0 documents being
processed. The <code>schemaLocation</code> attribute can be used to
give the processor a URI reference that explicitly locates the
schemas. A URI reference is a URI plus an optional fragment
identifier that indicates part of the resource. For schemas, the
fragment should identify the <code>schema</code> element. The
simplest way to accomplish this is to use the <code>id</code>
attribute, however XPointer (see [<cite><a href="#XPTR">XPointer
Framework</a></cite>]) can also be used.</p>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="id2299144" id="id2299144"></a>3.2.3.1 Using the id
Attribute to Identify Inline Schemas</h5>
<p><a href="#schemaIds.wsdl">Example 3-6</a> shows the use of the
<code>id</code> attribute. Both of the inline schemas have
<code>id</code> attributes. The id of the
<code>http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationItems</code>
schema is <code>items</code> and the id of the
<code>http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails</code>
schema is <code>details</code>. The <code>import</code> element in
the
<code>http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails</code>
schema uses the id of the
<code>http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationItems</code>
schema in the <code>schemaLocation</code> attribute, i.e.
<code>#items</code>.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"schemaIds.wsdl" id="schemaIds.wsdl"></a><em><span>Example
3-6.</span> Using Ids in Inline Schemas: schemaIds.wsdl</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/services/retrieveDetails"
xmlns:tns="http://greath.example.com/2004/services/retrieveDetails"
xmlns:wdetails="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<documentation>
This document describes the GreatH Retrieve Reservation Details
Web service.
</documentation>
<types>
<xs:schema id="items"
targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationItems">
<xs:element name="confirmationNumber" type="string" />
<xs:element name="checkInDate" type="date" />
<xs:element name="checkOutDate" type="date" />
<xs:element name="roomType" type="string" />
<xs:element name="smoking" type="boolean" />
</xs:schema>
<xs:schema id="details"
targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails"
xmlns:items="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationItems">
<xs:import
namespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationItems"
schemaLocation="#items" />
<xs:element name="reservationDetails">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element ref="items:confirmationNumber" />
<xs:element ref="items:checkInDate" />
<xs:element ref="items:checkOutDate" />
<xs:element ref="items:roomType" />
<xs:element ref="items:smoking" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
</xs:schema>
</types>
<interface name="retrieveDetailsInterface">
<operation name="retrieve"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out">
<input messageLabel="In" element="#none" />
<output messageLabel="Out"
element="wdetails:reservationDetails" />
</operation>
</interface>
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div1">
<h2><a name="advanced-topic_iii" id="advanced-topic_iii"></a>4.
Advanced Topics II: Extensibility and Predefined Extensions</h2>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="adv-extensibility" id="adv-extensibility"></a>4.1
Extensibility</h3>
<p>WSDL 2.0 provides an open content model, which allows XML
elements and attributes from other (non-WSDL 2.0) XML namespaces to
be interspersed in a WSDL 2.0 document. The qualified name
(complete with namespace URI) of the extension element or attribute
acts as an unambiguous name for the semantics of that
extension.</p>
<p>The namespace URI of the extension element should be
dereferenceable to a document that describes the semantics of that
extension. As of this writing, there is no generally accepted
standard for what kind of document that should be. However, the
<a href="http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/">W3C TAG</a> has been
discussing the issue (see TAG issue <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?type=1#namespaceDocument-8">
namespaceDocument-8</a>) and is likely to provide guidance at some
point.</p>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="adv-optional-versus-required" id=
"adv-optional-versus-required"></a>4.1.1 Optional Versus Required
Extensions</h4>
<p>Extensions can either be required or optional.</p>
<p>An <em>optional</em> extension is one that the client may either
engage or ignore, entirely at its discretion, and is signaled by
<code>wsdl:required="false"</code> or the absence of the
<code>wsdl:required</code> attribute (because it defaults to
false). Thus, a WSDL 2.0 processor, acting on behalf of the client,
that encounters an unknown optional extension can safely ignore it
and continue to process the WSDL 2.0 document. However, it is
important to stress that optional extensions are only optional to
the <em>client</em> -- not the service. A service must support all
optional and required extensions that it advertises in its WSDL 2.0
document.</p>
<p>A <em>required</em> extension is one that must be supported and
engaged by the client in order for the interaction to proceed
properly, and is signaled by <code>wsdl:required="true"</code>. If
a WSDL 2.0 processor, acting on behalf of the client, encounters a
required extension that it does not recognize or does not support,
then it cannot safely continue to process the WSDL 2.0 document. In
most practical cases, this is likely to mean that the processor
will require manual intervention to deal with the extension. For
example, a client developer might manually provide an
implementation for the required extension to the WSDL 2.0
processor.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="adv-MEP" id="adv-MEP"></a>4.2 Defining New MEPs</h3>
<p>As we mentioned in <a href=
"#more-interfaces-meps"><strong>2.4.4.3 Understanding Message
Exchange Patterns (MEPs)</strong></a>, even though the 8 MEPs
defined by WSDL 2.0 are intended to cover most of the common use
cases, there are situations that require new MEPs to be defined. In
this section, we will explain how new MEPs can be defined to
address special business requirements.</p>
<p>Following the wild success of its reservation service, GreatH
discovered that it could radically increase tourist interest by
supplying information on weather conditions, both to travel agents
and to the general touring public. This produced a challenge for
the service implementers: how could this information be supplied to
interested parties without requiring knowledge of web service
technology specifically, and of computers generally? At issue was
the desire to provide asynchronous updates to unsophisticated
customers without incurring onerous overheads for technical
support.</p>
<p>The solution adopted was to create a standard mailing list, and
to make available a small cross-platform web service client
(actually, a subscriber) that could be installed on any computer
with POP or IMAP access to a mailbox. The mailbox, once signed up
for the mailing list, could either be processed as "dedicated" (to
the GreatH weather service; travel agents did this) or as "general
purpose" (in which case the application would only examine those
emails that contained Subject headers associated with the service).
This required development of a binding to email, which is out of
scope for this example, but the resulting WSDL 2.0 was otherwise
quite straightforward.</p>
<p>Note: the email binding in use here supports publish/subscribe,
by supporting the robust-out-only MEP as well as the client/server
style in-out used for subscribing and unsubscribing. Details of
this binding would require a document as long as the primer, so
play along.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"weather-not-initial" id=
"weather-not-initial"></a><em><span>Example 4-1.</span> Weather
Notification Service (Initial)</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/weathSvc.wsdl"
xmlns:tns="http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/weathSvc.wsdl"
xmlns:wsoap="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap"
xmlns:email="http://www.example.com/webservices/email" >
<types>
. . .
</types>
<interface name="weatherInterface">
<operation name="opSubscribeWeather"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out">
<input element=". . ." />
<output element=". . ." />
</operation>
<operation name="opUnsubscribeWeather"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out">
<output element=". . ." />
<input element=". . ." />
</operation>
<operation name="opNotifyWeather"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/robust-out-only">
<output element=". . ." />
</operation>
</interface>
<binding name="weatherMailingListBinding"
interface="tns:weatherInterface
type="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap"
wsoap:protocol="http://www.example.com/bindings/email">
. . .
</binding>
<service name="weatherService"
interface="tns:weatherInterface">
<endpoint name="greatHWeatherList"
binding="tns:weatherMailingListBinding"
address="mailto:weather-owner@greath.example.com" />
</service>
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>Note: in the example, the messageLabels of all input and output
elements have been elided, as they are not necessary to
disambiguate (but note that the order of input and output elements
is not significant).</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the service was soon highjacked for the purpose
of annoyment. Repeatedly, hotels in less salubrious climes, and the
victims of various natural climactic disasters (hurricanes,
tornadoes) found themselves signed up to receive material full of
incomprehensible pointy brackets. They complained to GreatH, who
complained to their service designers.</p>
<p>Applying public key infrastructure to solving the problem was
immediately rejected as too complex and too heavyweight. Analysis
showed that the problem was simply to verify that the address
requesting information actually wanted that information.
Consequently, a new message exchange pattern was defined.</p>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="challenge-confirm" id="challenge-confirm"></a>4.2.1
Confirmed Challenge</h4>
<p>This pattern consists of two or more messages in order as
follows:</p>
<ol class="enumar">
<li>
<p>A message:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>indicated by a Message Label component whose message label is
"Request" and direction is "in"</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>received from some node N1</p>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<p>A message:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>indicated by a Message Label component whose message label is
"Challenge" and direction is "out"</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>sent to some node N2 (which <em>may</em> be the same node as
N1)</p>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<p>An optional message:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>indicated by a Message Label component whose message label is
"Confirmation" and direction is "in"</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>received from node N2</p>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<p>An optional message:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>indicated by a Message Label component whose message label is
"Response" and direction is "out"</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>sent to node N2</p>
</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ol>
<p>This pattern uses the rule Message Triggers Fault.</p>
<p>An operation using this message exchange pattern has a pattern
property with the value
"http://www.example.com/webservices/meps/confirmed-challenge".</p>
<p>Once the MEP had been defined (and the email binding
specification appropriately modified to indicate that this was a
supported MEP), the service was redefined and redeployed. Only the
changed operations are shown in the excerpt below.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"weather-not-final" id="weather-not-final"></a><em><span>Example
4-2.</span> Weather Notification Service (Revised)</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/weathSvc.wsdl"
xmlns:tns="http://greath.example.com/2004/wsdl/weathSvc.wsdl"
xmlns:wsoap="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap"
xmlns:email="http://www.example.com/webservices/email" >
. . .
<interface name="weatherInterface">
<operation name="opSubscribeWeather"
pattern="http://www.example.com/webservices/meps/confirmed-challenge">
<input messageLabel="Request" element=". . ." />
<output messageLabel="Challenge" element=". . ." />
<input messageLabel="Confirmation" element=". . ." />
<output messageLabel="Response" element=". . ." />
</operation>
<operation name="opUnsubscribeWeather"
pattern="http://www.example.com/webservices/meps/confirmed-challenge">
<output messageLabel="Challenge" element=". . ." />
<output messageLabel="Response" element=". . ." />
<input messageLabel="Confirmation" element=". . ." />
<input messageLabel="Request" element=". . ." />
</operation>
. . .
</interface>
. . .
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>Note: in the second example, the input and output examples are
not in the sequence in which they occur in the pattern; this
illustrates that the sequence is not significant. Note, however,
that for this pattern, the messageLabel attribute is required on
every input and output element.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="adv-RPCstyle" id="adv-RPCstyle"></a>4.3 RPC Style</h3>
<p>Section <a href="#more-interfaces-op-attr"><strong>2.4.4.1
Operation Attributes</strong></a> mentioned that the (optional)
<code>style</code> attribute of an interface operation is used to
indicate that the operation conforms to a particular pre-defined
operation style, or set of constraints. Actually, if desired the
<code>style</code> attribute can hold a list of URIs, indicating
that the operation simultaneously conforms to multiple styles.</p>
<p>Operation styles are named using URIs, in order to be
unambiguous while still permitted new styles to be defined without
requiring updates to the WSDL 2.0 language. WSDL 2.0 Part 2
[<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART2">WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts</a></cite>] defines
three such operation styles; one of these is the RPC Style
(<a href="http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20-adjuncts#RPCStyle">RPC
Style</a>).</p>
<p>The <em>RPC Style</em> is designed to facilitate programming
language bindings to WSDL 2.0 constructs. It allows a WSDL 2.0
interface operation to be easily mapped to a method or function
signature, such as a method signature in Java(TM) or C#. RPC Style
is restricted to operations that use the In-Out or In-Only MEPs
(see <a href="#more-interfaces-meps"><strong>2.4.4.3 Understanding
Message Exchange Patterns (MEPs)</strong></a>).</p>
<p>A WSDL 2.0 document makes use of the RPC Style in an interface
operation by first defining the operation in conformance with all
of the RPC Style rules, and then setting that operation's
<code>style</code> attribute to include the URI that identifies the
RPC Style, thus asserting that the operation does indeed conform to
the RPC Style. These rules permit the input and output message
schemas to map conveniently to inputs and outputs of a method
signature. Roughly, input elements map to input parameters, output
elements map to output parameters, and elements that appear both in
the input and output message schemas map to input/output
parameters. WSDL 2.0 Part 2 section "<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20-adjuncts#RPCStyle">RPC
Style</a>" provides full details of the mapping rules and
requirements.</p>
<p>The RPC Style also permits the full signature of the intended
mapping to be indicated explicitly, using the
<code>wrpc:signature</code> attribute defined in WSDL 2.0 Part 2
section "<a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20-adjuncts">wrpc:signature
Extension</a>". This is an (optional) extension to the WSDL 2.0
language whose value designates how input and output message schema
elements map to input and output parameters in the method
signature.</p>
<p>The example below illustrates how RPC Style may be used to
designate a signature. This example is a modified version of the
GreatH reservation service. In particular, the
<code>interface</code> and <code>types</code> sections have been
modified to specify and conform to the RPC Style.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-rpc-style" id="example-rpc-style"></a><em><span>Example
4-3.</span> Specifying RPC Style</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
. . .
<types>
<xs:element name="checkAvailability">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="checkInDate" type="xs:date"/>
<xs:element name="checkOutDate" type="xs:date"/>
<xs:element name="roomType" type="xs:string"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="checkAvailabilityResponse">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="roomType" type="xs:string"/>
<xs:element name="rateType" type="xs:string"/>
<xs:element name="rate" type="xs:double"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
. . .
</types>
<interface name = "reservationInterface" >
<operation name="checkAvailability"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out"
style="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/rpc"
wrpc:signature=
"checkInDate #in checkOutDate #in roomType #inout rateType #out rate #return">
<input messageLabel="In"
element="tns:checkAvailability" />
<output messageLabel="Out"
element="tns:checkAvailabilityResponse" />
</operation>
. . .
</interface>
. . .
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>Note that the interface operation's name
"<code>checkAvailability</code>", is the same as the localPart of
the input element's QName, "<code>tns:checkAvailability</code>".
This is one of the requirements of the RPC Style. The name of the
operation is used as the name of the method in a language binding,
subject to further mapping restrictions specific to the target
programming language. In this case, the name of the method would be
"<code>checkAvailability</code>".</p>
<p>The local children elements of the input element and output
element designate the parameters and the return type for a method
call. Note that the elements <code>checkInDate</code>,
<code>checkOutDate</code> are input parameters, however the element
<code>roomType</code> is an in-out parameter, as it appears both as
a local element child of both input and output elements. This
indicates that the reservation system may change the room type
requested based on availability.</p>
<p>The reservation service also returns a rate type for the
reservation, such as "rack rate". The return value for the method
is designated as the "rate" element.</p>
<p>Based on the value of the <code>wrpc:signature</code> attribute,
the method signature would be obtained following the order of the
parameters. A sample mapping is provided below for the Java(TM)
language. This example was created using JAX RPC 1.1
[<cite><a href="#jaxrpc">JAX RPC 1.1</a></cite>] for mapping simple
types to Java types and designated inout and output parameters by
using Holder classes.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-rpc-style-java-sig" id=
"example-rpc-style-java-sig"></a><em><span>Example 4-4.</span>
Sample Java(TM) Signature for RPC Style</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
public interface reservationInterface extends Remote{
double checkAvailability(java.util.calendar checkInDate,
java.util.calendar checkOutDate,
StringHolder roomType,
StringHolder rateType) throws RemoteException;
. . .
}
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>Programming languages may further specify how faults are mapped
to language constructs and their scopes, such as Exceptions, but
they are not specific to RPC style.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div1">
<h2><a name="advanced-topic_iv" id="advanced-topic_iv"></a>5.
Advanced Topics III: Miscellaneous</h2>
<p>This section covers various topics that may fall outside the
scope of WSDL 2.0, but shall provide useful background and best
practice guidances that may be useful when authoring a WSDL 2.0
document or implementing the WSDL 2.0 specification.</p>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="adv-message-dispatch" id=
"adv-message-dispatch"></a>5.1 Enabling Easy Message Dispatch</h3>
<p>It is desirable for a message recipient to have the capability
to uniquely identify a message type in order to handle it
correctly. The capability of identifying a message type is
typically used for dispatching purposes within an implementation of
a web service. Therefore, WSDL authors are recommended to consider
how to disambiguate message types when they develop their
services.</p>
<p>The context in which a Web service may be deployed plays an
important role in choosing an appropriate way to disambiguate and
identify message types. In a typical deployment, an endpoint
address may host a single service that is described by a WSDL
service element. In this case, when XSD is used, assigning unique
qualified names of global element declarations as inputs within the
interface that describes the service would be sufficient to
disambiguate the types of the messages that are received. However,
when endpoint address hosts multiple services, in essence
supporting several WSDL descriptions, the desire to disambiguate
message types should be considered within the context of all the
deployed services, not only within a single interface.</p>
<p>As explained in <a href=
"#more-interfaces-op-attr"><strong>2.4.4.1 Operation
Attributes</strong></a>, when XSD is used as the type system, a few
special tokens can be used for the <code>element</code> attributes.
Uniquely identifying a message type may become very difficult
when:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>any of these input elements within an interface has a value of
"#any"; or</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>more than one of these input elements (see below) has a value of
"#none"; or</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>the qualified names of the global element declarations that are
specified as input elements are NOT unique when considered
together.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>If any of the three cases above arise, disambiguation mechanisms
may be provided by means of an extension element (i.e., an element
that is not in the http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl namespace), having a
wsdl:required attribute with a value of "true". The semantics of
such an extension element would indicate the mechanism for
unambiguously identifing the mechanism that a message sender is
required to support in order to enable the message recipient to
unambiguously determine the message received.</p>
<p>For example, the WS-Addressing [<cite><a href=
"#WS-A">WS-Addressing</a></cite>] specification provides such a
disambiguation mechanism. It consists of an extension element which
may be marked as required, and defines a required [action] property
whose value is always present in a conformant message delivery. The
value of the action property can be used to disambiguate the
message by the receiver and there is a well defined way to
associate actions to messages in WS-Addressing specifications.
Further, WS-Addressing also provides an appropriate default action
value that identifies each message type uniquely.</p>
<p>When using the HTTP Binding, or when using the SOAP Binding with
the SOAP Response MEP, there is no SOAP envelope in a request
message, and thus mechanisms other than unique qualified names of
global element declarations, or headers such as wsa:Action, must be
considered. In these cases, the {address} and {http location}
properties may be constructed so as to provide a location that can
be correlated uniquely with an operation. For instance, one could
prefix the {http location} property with the operation name, or one
could ensure that the portion of the {http location} preceding the
first unescaped "{" character be unique per operation.</p>
</div>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="adv-versioning" id="adv-versioning"></a>5.2 Web
Service Versioning</h3>
<p>A WSDL 2.0 document describes a set of messages that a Web
service may send and receive. In essence, it describes a language
for interacting with that service. However it is possible for a Web
service to exchange other messages beyond those described in a
particular WSDL 2.0 document. Often this circumstance occurs
following an evolution of the client and/or service, and thus an
evolution of the interaction language.</p>
<p>How best to manage the evolution (versioning) of Web based
systems is, at the time of writing, the subject of a wide-ranging
debate. However, there are three activities within the W3C that are
directly relevant to versioning of Web services description:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>The <a href="http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/">Technical Architecture
Group (TAG)</a> has published guidance on the extensibility and
versioning of data formats in its Web Architecture document
[<cite><a href="#webarch">Web Architecture</a></cite>]. There is
also a more wide ranging draft finding on Versioning and
Extensibility [<cite><a href="#TAG-versioning">W3C TAG Finding:
Extending and Versioning Languages Part 1</a></cite>]. Both of
these works build upon the technical note on Web Architecture:
Extensible Languages [<cite><a href="#web-extensible">WebArch:
Extensible Languages</a></cite>].</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The <a href="http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema">XML Schema Working
Group</a> is collecting a series of use cases for schema versioning
as a part of the Schema 1.1 activity. See XML Schema Versioning Use
Cases [<cite><a href="#xsd-versioning">XML Schema: Versioning
Use-Cases</a></cite>].</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The Guide to Versioning XML Languages using XML Schema 1.1
[<cite><a href="#xsd-versioning-guide">Guide to Versioning XML
Languages using XML Schema 1.1</a></cite>] illustrates some
techniques for versioning XML languages enabled by features of XML
Schema 1.1 [<cite><a href="#xsd11">XML Schema 1.1</a></cite>].</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The <a href="http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/">Semantic
Web Best Practices and Deployments Working Group</a> is examining
how vocabularies may evolve. See [<cite><a href="#sw-vocabulary">SW
VocabManagementNote</a></cite>]</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>While incomplete, these activities all agree in one important
respect: that versioning is difficult, but you should anticipate
and plan for change.</p>
<p>The draft finding on Versioning and Extensibility details two
key approaches to versioning:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>compatible evolution; and</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>big bang.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="adv-versioning-compatible-evolution" id=
"adv-versioning-compatible-evolution"></a>5.2.1 Compatible
Evolution</h4>
<p>In <em>compatible evolution</em>, designers are expected to
limit changes to those that are either backward or forward
compatible, or both:</p>
<dl>
<dt class="label">Backward compatible</dt>
<dd>
<p>The receiver behaves correctly if it receives a message in an
<em>older</em> version of the interaction language.</p>
</dd>
<dt class="label">Forward compatible</dt>
<dd>
<p>The receiver behaves correctly if it receives a message in a
<em>newer</em> version of the interaction language.</p>
</dd>
</dl>
<p>Since Web services and their clients both send and receive
messages, these concepts can apply to both parties. However, since
WSDL 2.0 is service-centric, we will focus on the case of service
evolution.</p>
<p>There are three critical areas in which a service described in
WSDL 2.0 my evolve:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>The service now also supports additional binding. In compatible
evolution, this should be a safe addition, given that adding a new
binding should not impact any existing interactions using another
transport.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>An interface supports new operations. Again, in compatible
evolution this is usually safe, given that adding an additional
operation to an abstract interface should not impact any existing
interactions.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The message bodies may include additional data. How the message
contents may change within a description depends to a large extent
upon the type system being used to describe the message contents.
RelaxNG [<cite><a href="#relax-ng">RELAX NG</a></cite>] has good
support for describing vocabularies that ignore unknown XML, as
does OWL/RDF. XML Schema 1.0 has limited support for extending the
description of a message via the <code>xs:any</code> and
<code>xs:anyAttribute</code> constructs. XML Schema 1.1 has been
chartered to provide "changes necessary to provide better support
for versioning of schemas", and it is anticipated that this may
include improved support for more "open content" and therefore
better support for compatible evolution of messages.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The protocol used to exchange messages may provide mechanisms
for exchanging data outside of the message body. In the case of
SOAP, the WSDL 2.0 binding provides the ability to describe
application data to be exchanged as headers. The SOAP processing
model has a very good extensibility model with unknown headers
being ignored by a receiver by default. There is also a mechanism
whereby headers which are required as a part of an incompatible
change may be marked with a 'mustUnderstand' flag. Passing
additional items as headers may be the only way to compatibly
evolve messages with fixed bodies.</p>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="adv-versioning-big-bang" id=
"adv-versioning-big-bang"></a>5.2.2 Big Bang</h4>
<p>The <em>big bang</em> approach to versioning is the simplest to
currently represent in WSDL 2.0. In this approach, any change to a
WSDL 2.0 document implies a change to the document's namespace, a
change to the interface implies a new interface namespace and a
change to the message contents is communicated using a new message
namespace. This approach has particular benefits where an agent may
quickly tell if a service has changed by simply comparing the
namespace value.</p>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="ad-versioing-migration" id=
"ad-versioing-migration"></a>5.2.3 Evolving a Service</h4>
<p>Compatible changes are far more easily managed than incompatible
ones:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>With a compatible change the service need only support the
latest version of a service. A client may continue to use a service
adjusting to new version of the interface description at a time of
its choosing.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>With an incompatible change, the client receives a new version
of the interface description and is expected to adjust to the new
interface before old interface is terminated. Either the service
will need to continue to support both versions of the interface
during the hand over period, or the service and the clients are
coordinated to change at the same time. An alternative is for the
client to continue until it encounters an error, at which point it
uses the new version of the interface.</p>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="adv-versioning-combined" id=
"adv-versioning-combined"></a>5.2.4 Combined Approaches</h4>
<p>It is feasible to combine the "compatible evolution" and "big
bang" approaches in a variety of different ways. For example, the
namespace could be changed when message descriptions are changed,
but the namespace could stay the same when new operations are
added.</p>
<p>While the big bang approach is currently the easiest to
implement in WSDL 2.0, it can lead to a large number of cloned
interfaces that become difficult to manage, thus making the
compatible approach preferable to many for widely distributed
systems. In the end, the choice of a versioning strategy for Web
services described in WSDL 2.0 is left as an exercise to the
reader.</p>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="adv-versioning-examples" id=
"adv-versioning-examples"></a>5.2.5 Examples of Versioning and
Extending a Service</h4>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="id2301152" id="id2301152"></a>5.2.5.1 Additional
Optional Elements Added in Content</h5>
<p>The following example demonstrates how content may be extended
with additional content. The reservation service is changed to a
newer version that can accept an optional number of guests
parameter. The service provider wants existing clients to continue
to be able to use the service. The author adds the element into the
schema as an optional element.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-versioning-additional-elements" id=
"example-versioning-additional-elements"></a><em><span>Example
5-1.</span> XML Schema with Optional Elements</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<xs:complexType name="tCheckAvailability">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="checkInDate" type="xs:date"/>
<xs:element name="checkOutDate" type="xs:date"/>
<xs:element name="roomType" type="xs:string"/>
<xs:element name="numberOfGuests" type="xs:integer" minOccurs="0"/>
<xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>The author has the choice of keeping the same namespace or using
a different namespace for the additional content and the existing
content. In this scenario, it is a compatible change and the author
decides to keep the same namespace. This allows existing clients to
interact with a new service, and it allows newer clients to
interact with older services.</p>
</div>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="id2301217" id="id2301217"></a>5.2.5.2 Additional
Optional Elements Added to a Header</h5>
<p>Another option is to add the extension as a header block. This
is accomplished by defining an element for the extension and adding
a header element that references the element into the binding
operation as child of the input.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-versioning-additional-header-elements" id=
"example-versioning-additional-header-elements"></a><em><span>Example
5-2.</span> Additional optional elements added to a SOAP
header</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<xs:element name="NumberOfGuests" type="tNumberOfGuests"/>
<xs:complexType name="tNumberOfGuests">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="numberOfGuests" type="xs:integer" minOccurs="0"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<binding name="reservationSOAPBinding"
interface="tns:reservationInterface"
type="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap"
wsoap:protocol="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/">
<operation ref="tns:opCheckAvailability">
<input>
<wsoap:header element="tns:NumberOfGuests"/>
</input>
</operation>
...
</binding>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>It is also possible for the header to be marked with
soap:mustUnderstand set to true. The HTTP Binding has similar
functionality though without a mustUnderstand attribute.</p>
</div>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="id2301271" id="id2301271"></a>5.2.5.3 Additional
Mandatory Elements in Content</h5>
<p>This following example demonstrates an extension with additional
content. The reservation service requires a number of guests
parameter. The service provider wants existing clients to be unable
to use the service. The author adds the element into the schema as
a mandatory element.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-versioning-additional-mandatory-elements" id=
"example-versioning-additional-mandatory-elements"></a><em><span>Example
5-3.</span> Additional Mandatory Elements in Content</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<xs:complexType name="tCheckAvailabilityV2">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="checkInDate" type="xs:date"/>
<xs:element name="checkOutDate" type="xs:date"/>
<xs:element name="roomType" type="xs:string"/>
<xs:element name="numberOfGuests" type="xs:integer"/>
<xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="lax"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>The author has the choice of keeping the same namespace or using
a different namespace for the additional content and the existing
content. In this scenario, it is an incompatible change and the
author decides to use a new name but the same namespace. This type
is then used in the interface operation, and then binding and
service endpoints.</p>
</div>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="id2301354" id="id2301354"></a>5.2.5.4 Additional
Optional Operation Added to Interface</h5>
<p>Section <a href="#more-interfaces-inheritance"><strong>2.4.2
Interface Inheritance</strong></a> shows another type of versioning
or extension, where the reservationInterface extends the
MessageLogInterface. By definition of interface inheritance, a
client that understands just the MessageLogInterface will continue
to work with the reservationInterface, that it is backwards
compatible.</p>
</div>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="id2301385" id="id2301385"></a>5.2.5.5 Additional
Mandatory Operation Added to Interface</h5>
<p>Often mandatory operations are added to an interface. The Hotel
service decides to add an operation to the reservation service
which is a confirmation. The Hotel service requires that all
clients upgrade to the new interface to use the service. They have
a variety of options for indicating that the old interface is
deprecated.</p>
<p>By the definition of interface inheritance, they cannot use
interface inheritance for defining the extension.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-versioning-additional-mandatory-operation" id=
"example-versioning-additional-mandatory-operation"></a><em><span>Example
5-4.</span> Additional Mandatory Operation Added to the
Interface</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<interface name="reservationWithConfirmation" extends="cc:creditCardFaults">
...
<operation name="makeReservation">
<input messageLabel="In" element="ghns:makeReservation" />
<output messageLabel="Out" element="ghns:makeReservationResponse" />
<outfault ref="invalidDataFault" messageLabel="Out" />
<outfault ref="cc:cancelledCreditCard" messageLabel="Out" />
<outfault ref="cc:expiredCreditCard" messageLabel="Out" />
<outfault ref="cc:invalidCreditCardNumber" messageLabel="Out" />
<outfault ref="cc:invalidExpirationDate" messageLabel="Out" />
</operation>
<operation name="confirmReservation">
<input messageLabel="In" element="ghns:makeReservationResponse" />
<output messageLabel="Out" element="ghns:confirmReservationResponse" />
<outfault ref="expiredReservation" messageLabel="Out" />
</operation>
</interface>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>This interface cannot be bound and deployed at the existing URI
and indicate incompatibility, as the service will still accept the
makeReservation request. Changing the name of the interface from
reservation to reservationWithConfirmation or changing the name of
the operation from makeReservation to makeReservationV2 does not
affect the messages that are exchanged. Thus it can't be used as a
mechanism for indicating incompatibility. To indicate
incompatibility, a change must be made to something that appears in
the message. For a SOAP over HTTP request, the list is roughly the
URI, the SOAP Action HTTP Header, or the Message content.</p>
</div>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="id2301454" id="id2301454"></a>5.2.5.6 Indicating
Incompatibility by Changing the Endpoint URI</h5>
<p>To indicate incompatibility, the URI of the Hotel Endpoint can
be changed and messages send to the old Endpoint return a
Fault.</p>
</div>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="id2301490" id="id2301490"></a>5.2.5.7 Indicating
Incompatibility by Changing the SOAP Action</h5>
<p>The SOAP Action can be set for the makeReservation request, and
making it different than the earlier version should indicate
incompatibility.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-versioning-SOAP-Action" id=
"example-versioning-SOAP-Action"></a><em><span>Example 5-5.</span>
Indicating Incompatibility by changing the SOAP Action</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<binding name="reservationSOAPBinding"
interface="tns:reservationInterface"
type="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap"
wsoap:protocol="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/">
<operation ref="tns:makeReservation"
wsoap:action="tns:makeReservationV2"/>
. . .
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>Note that this mechanism is applicable on a per-binding basis.
The SOAP HTTP Binding provides for setting Action, but other
bindings may not provide such a facility.</p>
</div>
<div class="div4">
<h5><a name="id2301552" id="id2301552"></a>5.2.5.8 Indicating
Incompatibility by Changing the Element Content</h5>
<p>The namespace or name of the makeReservation element can be
changed, and then the interface and bindings changed. To indicate
incompatibility, requests using the old makeReservation QName
should probably return a fault. The new interface, with a changed
makeReservation, is:</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example-versioning-changing-element-content" id=
"example-versioning-changing-element-content"></a><em><span>Example
5-6.</span> Indicating incompatibility by changing the element
content</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<xs:element name="ghns2:makeReservation" type="ghns:tmakeReservation"/>
<interface . . .>
<operation name="makeReservation">
<input messageLabel="In" element="ghns2:makeReservation" />
</interface>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>The binding and service endpoints require no change.</p>
<p>Finally, the service could also provide an interface for
ghns:makeReservation that only returns a fault.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="adv-service-references" id=
"adv-service-references"></a>5.3 Describing Web Service Messages
That Refer to Other Web Services</h3>
<p>Hyperlinking is one of the defining characteristics of the Web.
The ability to navigate from one Web page to another is extremely
useful. It is therefore natural to apply this capability to Web
services. This section describes references to endpoints and
services, which are the Web service analogs of document
hyperlinks.</p>
<p>A <em>reference to an endpoint</em> is an element or attribute
that contains the address of a Web service endpoint. A
<em>reference to a service</em> is an element or attribute that
contains one or more references to the endpoints of a service. If
the interface or binding that the service or endpoint implements is
known at description time, it may be useful to add this information
to the WSDL 2.0 document that describes the Web service. This is
accomplished by using the <code>wsdlx:interface</code> or
<code>wsdlx:binding</code> attribute to annotate the XML Schema
component that defines the message.</p>
<p>One may wonder, from a Web architectural point of view, why
anything more than a URI would be needed to reference a Web
service. Indeed, a reference to a service does make use of one or
more URIs to indicate the endpoint addresses of a service. However,
it may also include additional metadata about that service, such as
the WSDL 2.0 interface and binding that the service supports.</p>
<p>References to services and endpoints will be illustrated by
expanding the GreatH example already discussed.</p>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="reservationDetails" id="reservationDetails"></a>5.3.1
The Reservation Details Web Service</h4>
<p>When designing a Web application it is natural to give each
important concept a URI. In the GreatH hotel reservation system,
the important concepts are reservations, so we begin our design by
assigning a URI to each reservation. Since each reservation has a
unique confirmation number, e.g OMX736, we create a URI for each
reservation by appending the confirmation number to a base URI,
e.g. http://greath.example.com/2004/reservation/OMX736. This URI
will be the endpoint address for a Reservation Details Web service
that can retrieve and update the state of a reservation. <a href=
"#reservationDetails-OMX736.xml">Example 5-7</a> shows the format
of the reservation detail.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"reservationDetails-OMX736.xml" id=
"reservationDetails-OMX736.xml"></a><em><span>Example 5-7.</span>
Detail for Reservation OMX736</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reservationDetails
xmlns="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails">
<confirmationNumber>OMX736</confirmationNumber>
<checkInDate>2005-06-01</checkInDate>
<checkOutDate>2005-06-03</checkOutDate>
<roomType>single</roomType>
<smoking>false</smoking>
</reservationDetails>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>The Reservation Details Web service provides operations for
retrieving and updating the detail for a reservation. <a href=
"#reservationDetails.wsdl">Example 5-8</a> shows the description
for this Web service. Note that there is no <code>service</code>
element in this description since the set of reservations is
dynamic. Instead, the endpoints for the reservations will be
returned by querying the Reservation List Web service.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"reservationDetails.wsdl" id=
"reservationDetails.wsdl"></a><em><span>Example 5-8.</span> The
Reservation Details Web Service Description:
reservationDetails.wsdl</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/services/reservationDetails"
xmlns:tns="http://greath.example.com/2004/services/reservationDetails"
xmlns:wdetails="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails"
xmlns:wsoap="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<documentation>
This document describes the GreatH Reservation Details Web
services. Use these services to retrieve or update reservation
details. Each reservation has its own service and endpoint. To
obtain the reference for a reservation service, make a request to
the GreatH Reservation List Web service. See
reservationList.wsdl for a description of the Reservation List
Web service.
</documentation>
<types>
<xs:import
namespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails"
schemaLocation="reservationDetails.xsd" />
</types>
<interface name="reservationDetailsInterface">
<operation name="retrieve"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out">
<input messageLabel="In" element="#none" />
<output messageLabel="Out"
element="wdetails:reservationDetails" />
</operation>
<operation name="update"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out">
<input messageLabel="In"
element="wdetails:reservationDetails" />
<output messageLabel="Out"
element="wdetails:reservationDetails" />
</operation>
</interface>
<binding name="reservationDetailsSOAPBinding"
interface="tns:reservationDetailsInterface"
type="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap"
wsoap:protocol="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/">
<operation ref="tns:retrieve"
wsoap:mep="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request-response" />
<operation ref="tns:update"
wsoap:mep="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request-response" />
</binding>
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p><a href="#reservationDetails.xsd">Example 5-9</a> shows the XML
schema elements that are used in this Web service.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"reservationDetails.xsd" id=
"reservationDetails.xsd"></a><em><span>Example 5-9.</span> The
Reservation Details Web Service XML Schema:
reservationDetails.xsd</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
elementFormDefault="qualified"
targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails"
xmlns:tns="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails"
xmlns:wdetails="http://greath.example.com/2004/services/reservationDetails"
xmlns:wsdli="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-instance"
xmlns:wsdlx="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-extensions"
wsdli:wsdlLocation="http://greath.example.com/2004/services/reservationDetails reservationDetails.wsdl">
<element name="confirmationNumber" type="string" />
<element name="checkInDate" type="date" />
<element name="checkOutDate" type="date" />
<element name="reservationDetails">
<complexType>
<sequence>
<element ref="tns:confirmationNumber" />
<element ref="tns:checkInDate" />
<element ref="tns:checkOutDate" />
<element name="roomType" type="string" />
<element name="smoking" type="boolean" />
</sequence>
</complexType>
</element>
<simpleType name="reservationDetailsSOAPEndpointType" wsdlx:binding="wdetails:reservationDetailsSOAPBinding">
<restriction base="anyURI"/>
</simpleType>
<element name="reservationDetailsSOAPEndpoint" type="tns:reservationDetailsSOAPEndpointType" />
<element name="reservationDetailsService">
<annotation>
<documentation>
This element contains references to the Reservation
Details Web Service endpoints for this reservation.
</documentation>
</annotation>
<complexType>
<sequence>
<element name="soap" type="tns:reservationDetailsSOAPEndpointType"/>
<element name="secure-soap" type="tns:reservationDetailsSOAPEndpointType"/>
</sequence>
</complexType>
</element>
</schema>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>This XML schema contains the usual definitions for the elements
that appear in the messages of the Web service. For example, the
<code>reservationDetails</code> element is used in the messages of
the <code>retrieve</code> and <code>update</code> operations. In
addition, the schema defines the simple type
<code>reservationDetailsSOAPEndpointType</code> which is based on
<code>xs:anyURI</code> and has the annotation <code>wsdlx:binding =
"wdetails:reservationDetailsSOAPBinding"</code> which means that
the URI is the address of a Reservation Details Web service
endpoint that implements the
<code>wdetails:reservationDetailsSOAPBinding</code> binding. Note
that the <code>wsdli:wsdlLocation</code> attribute is used to
define the location of the WSDL 2.0 document that defines the
<code>wdetails:reservationDetailsSOAPBinding</code> binding. This
annotated simple type is used to define the
<code>reservationDetailsSOAPEndpoint</code> element which will be
used in the Reservation List service.</p>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="reservationList" id="reservationList"></a>5.3.2 The
Reservation List Web Service</h4>
<p>Since the set of reservations changes as reservations are made
and cancelled, the Reservation Detail endpoints are not described
in a fixed WSDL 2.0 document. Instead they are returned as
references to endpoints in response to requests made on a
Reservation List Web service. The endpoint address for the
Reservation List service will be
http://greath.example.com/2004/reservationList.</p>
<p><a href="#reservationList-all.xml">Example 5-10</a> shows the
format of the response from the Reservation List service.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"reservationList-all.xml" id=
"reservationList-all.xml"></a><em><span>Example 5-10.</span>
Response from the Reservation List Web Service</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<reservationList
xmlns="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationList"
xmlns:details="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails">
<reservation>
<details:confirmationNumber>HSG635</details:confirmationNumber>
<details:checkInDate>2005-06-27</details:checkInDate>
<details:checkOutDate>2005-06-28</details:checkOutDate>
<details:reservationDetailsSOAPEndpoint>
http://greath.example.com/2004/reservation/HSG635
</details:reservationDetailsSOAPEndpoint>
</reservation>
<reservation>
<details:confirmationNumber>OMX736</details:confirmationNumber>
<details:checkInDate>2005-06-01</details:checkInDate>
<details:checkOutDate>2005-06-03</details:checkOutDate>
<details:reservationDetailsSOAPEndpoint>
http://greath.example.com/2004/reservation/OMX736
</details:reservationDetailsSOAPEndpoint>
</reservation>
<reservation>
<details:confirmationNumber>WUH663</details:confirmationNumber>
<details:checkInDate>2005-06-11</details:checkInDate>
<details:checkOutDate>2005-06-15</details:checkOutDate>
<details:reservationDetailsSOAPEndpoint>
http://greath.example.com/2004/reservation/WUH663
</details:reservationDetailsSOAPEndpoint>
</reservation>
</reservationList>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>Here, the
<code><details:reservationDetailsSOAPEndpoint></code>
elements contain references to the Reservation Details Web service
endpoints for the reservations HSG635, OMX736, and WUH663.</p>
<p><a href="#reservationList.wsdl">Example 5-11</a> shows the
description of the Reservation List Web service. Note that it
contains operations to retrieve the entire list and to query for a
list of reservations by confirmation number, check-in date, and
check-out date. In each case, the operation returns a list of
reservations.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"reservationList.wsdl" id=
"reservationList.wsdl"></a><em><span>Example 5-11.</span> The
Reservation List Web Service Description:
reservationList.wsdl</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<description
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl"
targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/services/reservationList"
xmlns:tns="http://greath.example.com/2004/services/reservationList"
xmlns:details="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails"
xmlns:list="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationList"
xmlns:wsoap="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<documentation>
This document describes the GreatH Reservation List Web
services. Use this service to retrieve lists of reservations
based on a variety of search criteria.
</documentation>
<types>
<xs:import
namespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails"
schemaLocation="reservationDetails.xsd" />
<xs:import
namespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationList"
schemaLocation="reservationList.xsd" />
</types>
<interface name="reservationListInterface">
<operation name="retrieve"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out">
<input messageLabel="In" element="#none" />
<output messageLabel="Out" element="list:reservationList" />
</operation>
<operation name="retrieveByConfirmationNumber"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out">
<input messageLabel="In"
element="details:confirmationNumber" />
<output messageLabel="Out" element="list:reservationList" />
</operation>
<operation name="retrieveByCheckInDate"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out">
<input messageLabel="In" element="details:checkInDate" />
<output messageLabel="Out" element="list:reservationList" />
</operation>
<operation name="retrieveByCheckOutDate"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out">
<input messageLabel="In" element="details:checkOutDate" />
<output messageLabel="Out" element="list:reservationList" />
</operation>
</interface>
<binding name="reservationListSOAPBinding"
interface="tns:reservationListInterface"
type="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap"
wsoap:protocol="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/">
<operation ref="tns:retrieve"
wsoap:mep="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request-response" />
<operation ref="tns:retrieveByConfirmationNumber"
wsoap:mep="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request-response" />
<operation ref="tns:retrieveByCheckInDate"
wsoap:mep="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request-response" />
<operation ref="tns:retrieveByCheckOutDate"
wsoap:mep="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request-response" />
</binding>
<service name="reservationListService"
interface="tns:reservationListInterface">
<endpoint name="reservationListEndpoint"
binding="tns:reservationListSOAPBinding"
address="http://greath.example.com/2004/reservationList" />
</service>
</description>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p><a href="#reservationList.xsd">Example 5-12</a> shows the schema
for the messages used in the Reservation List Web service.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"reservationList.xsd" id=
"reservationList.xsd"></a><em><span>Example 5-12.</span> The
Reservation List Schema: reservationList.xsd</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
elementFormDefault="qualified"
targetNamespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationList"
xmlns:tns="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationList"
xmlns:details="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails"
xmlns:wsdli="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-instance">
<import
namespace="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-instance" />
<import
namespace="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails"
schemaLocation="reservationDetails.xsd" />
<element name="reservation">
<annotation>
<documentation>
A reservation contains the confirmation number, check-in
and check-out dates, and a reference to a Reservation
Details Web service.
</documentation>
</annotation>
<complexType>
<sequence>
<element ref="details:confirmationNumber" />
<element ref="details:checkInDate" />
<element ref="details:checkOutDate" />
<element ref="details:reservationDetailsSOAPEndpoint" />
</sequence>
</complexType>
</element>
<element name="reservationList">
<annotation>
<documentation>
A reservation list contains a sequence of zero or more
reservations.
</documentation>
</annotation>
<complexType>
<sequence>
<element ref="tns:reservation" minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="unbounded">
</element>
</sequence>
<attribute ref="wsdli:wsdlLocation" />
</complexType>
</element>
</schema>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>In the preceding example, there was a single endpoint associated
with each Reservation Detail Web service. Suppose GreatH hotel
decided to provide a second, secure endpoint. In this case,
references to services would be used to collect together the
endpoints for each reservation. The reservationDetails.xsd schema
defines the <code>reservationDetailsService</code> element for this
purpose. It contains the nested elements <code>soap</code> and
<code>secure-soap</code> which are each of type
<code>reservationDetailsSOAPEndpointType</code> and therefore
contain the address of an endpoint that implements the
<code>wdetails:reservationDetailsSOAPBinding</code> binding.</p>
<p><a href="#reservationServiceReferences-HSG635.xml">Example
5-13</a> shows an example of a message that contains a reference to
the service for reservation HGS635. Note that the service contains
two endpoints, one of which provides secure access to the
Reservation Details Web service.</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"reservationServiceReferences-HSG635.xml" id=
"reservationServiceReferences-HSG635.xml"></a><em><span>Example
5-13.</span> A Reference to the Reservation Details Web
Service</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<details:reservationDetailsService
xmlns:details="http://greath.example.com/2004/schemas/reservationDetails"
<details:soap>
http://greath.example.com/2004/reservation/HSG635
</details:soap>
<details:secure-soap>
https://greath.example.com/2004/reservation/HSG635
</details:secure-soap>
</details:reservationDetailsService>
</pre></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="reservationDetails_HTTP" id=
"reservationDetails_HTTP"></a>5.3.3 Reservation Details Web Service
Using HTTP Transfer</h4>
<p>This section presents a variation on the example in <a href=
"#reservationDetails"><strong>5.3.1 The Reservation Details Web
Service</strong></a> . It illustrates the use of HTTP transfer
operations, GET and PUT, to retrieve and update GreatH hotel
reservation details using the Representational State Transfer
(REST) architectural style described by Roy Fielding
[<cite><a href="#rest">REST</a></cite>] . REST is a distillation of
the architectural properties that Dr. Fielding identified as being
vital to the Web's robustness and enormous scalability.</p>
<p>Since each reservation in our example will have a distinct URI,
the Reservation Details Web service can be offered using HTTP GET
and HTTP PUT. The binding would be modified as follows:</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"reservationDetails_HTTP_example" id=
"reservationDetails_HTTP_example"></a><em><span>Example
5-14.</span> Reservation Details Web Service Using HTTP
Transfer</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
. . .
<binding name="reservationDetailsHTTPBinding"
type="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/http"
interface="tns:reservationDetailsInterface" >
<operation ref="tns:retrieve"
whttp:method="GET" />
<operation ref="tns:update"
whttp:method="PUT" />
</binding>
. . .
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>As with the example in <a href=
"#reservationDetails"><strong>5.3.1 The Reservation Details Web
Service</strong></a> , service and endpoint elements are not
provided because the Reservation List Web service provides the
endpoints.</p>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="reservationList_HTTP_GET" id=
"reservationList_HTTP_GET"></a>5.3.4 Reservation List Web Service
Using HTTP GET</h4>
<p>This section continues the REST-style example of <a href=
"#reservationDetails_HTTP"><strong>5.3.3 Reservation Details Web
Service Using HTTP Transfer</strong></a> by modifying the example
of <a href="#reservationList"><strong>5.3.2 The Reservation List
Web Service</strong></a> to use HTTP GET.</p>
<p>The SOAP version of the Reservation List Web service above
offers four different search operations. These can also be
expressed as various parameters in a URI used by HTTP GET:</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example_reservationList_HTTP_GET" id=
"example_reservationList_HTTP_GET"></a><em><span>Example
5-15.</span> Reservation List Web Service Using HTTP GET</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
. . .
<binding name="reservationListHTTPBinding"
type="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/http"
interface="tns:reservationListInterface"
whttp:methodDefault="GET">
<operation ref="tns:retrieve"
whttp:location="" />
<operation ref="tns:retrieveByConfirmationNumber"
whttp:location="reservationList/ConfirmationNumber/{confirmationNumber/}" />
<operation ref="tns:retrieveByCheckInDate"
whttp:location="reservationList/CheckInDate/{checkInDate/}" />
<operation ref="tns:retrieveByCheckOutDate"
whttp:location="reservationList/CheckOutDate/{checkOutDate/}" />
</binding>
. . .
<service . . . >
<endpoint name="reservationListEndpoint"
binding="tns:reservationListHTTPBinding"
address="http://greath.example.com/2004/reservationList" />
. . .
</service>
. . .
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>A retrieval by Confirmation Number URI would look like:
<code>http://greath.example.com/2004/reservationList/ConfirmationNumber/HSG635
.</code></p>
<p>Alternatively, a single query type may be provided. This query
type is a sequence of optional items. Any items in the sequence are
serialized into the URI query string. A query sequence for any of
ConfirmationNumber, checkInDate, checkOutDate would look like
this:</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example_reservationList_HTTP_GET_single" id=
"example_reservationList_HTTP_GET_single"></a><em><span>Example
5-16.</span> Query Sequence Using a Single Query Type</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
<element name="reservationQuery">
<annotation>
<documentation>
A reservation contains the confirmation number, check-in
and check-out dates, and a reference to a Reservation
Details Web service.
</documentation>
</annotation>
<complexType>
<sequence>
<element ref="details:confirmationNumber" minOccurs="0"/>
<element ref="details:checkInDate" minOccurs="0"/>/>
<element ref="details:checkOutDate" minOccurs="0"/>/>
</sequence>
</sequence>
</complexType>
</element>
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>The WSDL 2.0 service that offers this type serialized as a
parameter would look like this:</p>
<div class="exampleOuter">
<p style="text-align: left" class="exampleHead"><a name=
"example_reservationList_HTTP_GET_single_wsdl" id=
"example_reservationList_HTTP_GET_single_wsdl"></a><em><span>Example
5-17.</span> WSDL 2.0 for Using a Single Query Type</em></p>
<div class="exampleInner">
<pre xml:space="preserve">
. . .
<interface name="reservationListInterfaceWithQuery">
<operation name="retrieveByReservationQuery"
pattern="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out">
<input messageLabel="In"
element="details:ReservationQuery" />
<output messageLabel="Out"
element="list:reservationList" />
</operation>
</interface>
<binding name="reservationListQueryHTTPBinding"
type="http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/http"
interface="tns:reservationListInterfaceWithQuery"
whttp:methodDefault="GET">
<operation ref="tns:retrieveByReservationQuery"
whttp:location="reservationList/{ReservationQuery}}" />
</binding>
. . .
<endpoint name="reservationListEndpoint"
binding="tns:reservationListHTTPBinding"
address="http://greath.example.com/2004/reservationList" />
. . .
</pre></div>
</div>
<p>Various URIs would be:
<code>http://greath.example.com/2004/reservationList/ReservationQuery?confirmationNumber=HSG635</code>
<code>http://greath.example.com/2004/reservationList/ReservationQuery?checkInDate=06-06-05</code>
.</p>
<p>It is important to observe that using the URI serialization can
result in very flexible queries and few operations. The previous
discrete SOAP operations are collapsed into one "parameterized"
operation.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="adv-multiple-docs-describing-same-service" id=
"adv-multiple-docs-describing-same-service"></a>5.4 Multiple
Interfaces for the Same Service</h3>
<p>Suppose a Web service wishes to expose two different interfaces:
a customer interface for its regular users, and a management
interface for its operator. A <code>wsdl:service</code> specifies
only one wsdl:interface, so to achieve the desired effect the
service provider would somehow need to indicate a relationship
between two services. How can a service provider indicate a
relationship between services? Potential strategies include:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p><strong>Declare both interfaces in the same wsdl:description
element.</strong> Although WSDL 2.0 does not ascribe any particular
significance to the fact that two wsdl:services are declared within
the same wsdl:description, an application or toolkit could
interpret this to mean that they are related in some way.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Declare both interfaces in the same
wsdl:targetNamespace.</strong> Again, although WSDL 2.0 does not
ascribe any particular significance to the fact that two
wsdl:services are declared within the same wsdl:targetNamespace, an
application or toolkit could interpret this to mean that they are
related in some way.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Add an extension to WSDL 2.0</strong> that links
together all services that are related in this way. WSDL 2.0's open
content model permits extension elements from other namespaces to
appear in a WSDL 2.0 document.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Declare them in completely separate WSDL 2.0 documents,
but use the same endpoint address for both.</strong> I.e., declare
a <code>wsdl:interface</code> and <code>wsdl:service</code> for the
customer interface in one WSDL 2.0 document, and a
<code>wsdl:interface</code> and <code>wsdl:service</code> for the
management interface in a different WSDL 2.0 document, but use the
same endpoint address for both. (By "different WSDL 2.0 document"
we mean that both documents are never included or imported into the
same WSDL 2.0 descriptions component.) Although this approach may
work in some circumstances, it means that the same endpoint address
would be used for two different purposes, which is apt to cause
confusion or ambiguity. Furthermore, it is contrary to the Web
architectural principle that different URIs should be used to
identify different Web resources. (See the Web Architecture
[<cite><a href="#webarch">Web Architecture</a></cite>] section on
<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#URI-collision">URI
collision</a>.)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p><strong>Use inheritance to combine the customer interface and
management interface</strong> into a single, larger wsdl:interface.
Of course, this reduces modularity and means that the management
interface becomes exposed to the customers, which is not good.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Bear in mind that since the above strategies step outside of the
WSDL 2.0 language specifies (and are therefore neither endorsed nor
forbidden by the WSDL 2.0 specification) the WSDL 2.0 specification
cannot define or standardize their semantics.</p>
<p>The desire to express relationships between services is also
relevant to Web service versioning, discussed next.</p>
</div>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="adv-rdf-mapping" id="adv-rdf-mapping"></a>5.5 Mapping
to RDF and Semantic Web</h3>
<p>WSDL 2.0 is a language designed primarily with XML syntax. While
XML is almost universally understood, it has several issues:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>The ability to compose two XML documents into one depends on the
languages of those documents. WSDL 2.0 does not permit Web service
descriptions in different targetNamespaces to be merged into a
single (physical) XML document.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The ability to extend XML languages with other XML languages
depends on the languages again. WSDL 2.0 is extremely extensible,
but the meaning of every single extension in WSDL 2.0 must be
defined explicitly. Putting a piece of XMI (XML format for UML)
into a WSDL 2.0 document may have different meaning from putting it
into an XHTML document. Therefore XML-based extensibility has very
high cost if many languages are involved.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Similarly, extending another XML language with pieces of WSDL
2.0, while possible, has to be defined for all the possible
destinations. Putting a WSDL 2.0 interface element into a UDDI
registry may mean a different thing from putting that interface
element into an XHTML document.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Finally, the meaning of a portion of a WSDL 2.0 document is not
defined by the WSDL 2.0 specification. While an interface element
could form a single XML document, it is not a WSDL 2.0 document, so
its meaning is largely undefined.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Applications that require such levels of composability (or
decomposability) are increasingly being based on RDF
[<cite><a href="#rdf">RDF</a></cite>], a graph-based knowledge
representation language, and Web Ontology Language (OWL)
[<cite><a href="#owl">OWL</a></cite>], which can be thought of as
an advanced schema language for RDF. Effectively, a WSDL 2.0
document represented in RDF can be more easily extended with
arbitrary RDF assertions and the WSDL 2.0 information can be more
easily associated with arbitrary other knowledge.</p>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="adv-rdf-rep-wsdl" id="adv-rdf-rep-wsdl"></a>5.5.1 RDF
Representation of WSDL 2.0</h4>
<p><em>WSDL 2.0: Mapping to RDF</em> [<cite><a href="#RDFmap">WSDL
2.0 RDF Mapping</a></cite>] describes how WSDL 2.0 constructs can
be expressed in RDF using classes of resources (described with an
ontology expressed in OWL) and assertions over individual
resources. As RDF represents knowledge using resources and
relationships between them, we need to turn WSDL 2.0 concepts into
this model. This is done as follows.</p>
<ol class="enumar">
<li>
<p>First, all components in WSDL 2.0 (like Interfaces, Operations,
Bindings, Services, Endpoints etc., including extensions) are
turned into resources identified with the appropriate URIs created
according to <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-20070626#wsdl-iri-references">
Appendix C IRI-References for WSDL 2.0 Components</a> of
[<cite><a href="#WSDL-PART1">WSDL 2.0 Core</a></cite>].</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Further, things are represented as resources:</p>
<ol class="enumla">
<li>
<p>Element declarations gathered from XML Schema (or similarly,
other components from other type systems)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Message content models</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Message exchange patterns (the URI identifying the MEP is the
URI of the resource)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Operation styles (similarly to MEPs, the URI of an operation
style is the URI of the resource)</p>
</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>
<p>All the resources above are given the appropriate types using
rdf:type statements (an interface will belong to the class
Interface and an operation within an interface will belong to the
class InterfaceOperation, for example).</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>All relationships in WSDL 2.0 (like an Operation's belonging to
an Interface and having a given operation style) are turned into
RDF statements using appropriate properties, such as
<code>operation</code> and <code>operationStyle</code>.</p>
</li>
</ol>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="adv-notes-on-uris" id="adv-notes-on-uris"></a>5.6
Notes on URIs</h3>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="adv-namespaces-and-schema-locations" id=
"adv-namespaces-and-schema-locations"></a>5.6.1 XML Namespaces and
Schema Locations</h4>
<p>It is a common misperception to equate either the target
namespace of an XML Schema or the value of the <code>xmlns</code>
attribute in XML instances with the location of the corresponding
schema. Even though namespaces are URIs, and URIs may be locations,
and it may be possible to retrieve a schema from such a location,
this does not mean that the retrieved schema is the <em>only</em>
schema that is associated with that namespace. There can be
multiple schemas associated with a particular namespace, and it is
up to a processor of XML to determine which one to use in a
particular processing context. The WSDL 2.0 specification provides
the processing context here via the <code>import</code> mechanism,
which is based on XML Schema's term for the similar concept.</p>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="adv-relative-uris" id="adv-relative-uris"></a>5.6.2
Relative URIs</h4>
<p>Throughout this document there are fully qualified URIs used in
WSDL 2.0 and XSD examples. In some cases, fully qualified URIs were
used simply to illustrate the referencing concepts. However, the
use of relative URIs is allowed and warranted in many cases. For
information on processing relative URIs, see <a href=
"http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt">RFC3986</a>.</p>
</div>
<div class="div3">
<h4><a name="adv-generating-uris" id=
"adv-generating-uris"></a>5.6.3 Generating Temporary URIs</h4>
<p>In general, when a WSDL 2.0 document is published for use by
others, it should only contain URIs that are globally unique. This
is usually done by allocating them under a domain name that is
controlled by the issuer. For example, the W3C allocates namespace
URIs under its base domain name, w3.org.</p>
<p>However, it is sometimes desirable to make up a temporary URI
for an entity, for use during development, but not make the URI
globally unique for all time and have it "mean" that version of the
entity (schema, WSDL 2.0 document, etc.). <em>Reserved Top Level
DNS Names</em> [<cite><a href="#RFC2606">IETF RFC 2606</a></cite>]
specifies some URI base names that are reserved for use for this
type of behavior. For example, the base URI "http://example.org/"
can be used to construct a temporary URI without any unique
association to an entity. This means that two people or programs
could choose to simultaneously use the temporary URI "
http://example.org/userSchema" for two completely different
schemas. As long as the scope of use of these URIs does not
intersect, then they would be unique enough. However, it is not
recommended that " http://example.org/" be used as a base for
stable, fixed entities.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div1">
<h2><a name="References" id="References"></a>6. References</h2>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="Normative-References" id=
"Normative-References"></a>6.1 Normative References</h3>
<dl>
<dt class="label"><a name="RFC2119" id="RFC2119"></a>[IETF RFC
2119]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt">Key words
for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels</a></cite>, S.
Bradner, Author. Internet Engineering Task Force, March 1997.
Available at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="RFC3023" id="RFC3023"></a>[IETF RFC
3023]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3023.txt">XML Media
Types</a></cite>, M. Murata, S. St. Laurent, D. Kohn, Authors.
Internet Engineering Task Force, January 2001. Available at
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3023.txt</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="RFC3986" id="RFC3986"></a>[IETF RFC
3986]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt">Uniform
Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax</a></cite>, T.
Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, L. Masinter, Authors. Internet
Engineering Task Force, January 2005. Available at
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="RFC3987" id="RFC3987"></a>[IETF RFC
3987]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987.txt">Internationalized Resource
Identifiers (IRIs)</a></cite>, M. Duerst, M. Suignard, Authors.
Internet Engineering Task Force, January 2005. Available at
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987.txt</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="XML10" id="XML10"></a>[XML 1.0]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816">Extensible Markup
Language (XML) 1.0 (Fourth Edition)</a></cite>, T. Bray, J. Paoli,
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, and E. Maler, Editors. World Wide Web
Consortium, 10 February 1998, revised 16 August 2006. This version
of the XML 1.0 Recommendation is
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816. The <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xml">latest version of XML 1.0</a> is
available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xml.</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="XMLInfoSet" id="XMLInfoSet"></a>[XML
Information Set]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-infoset-20040204/">XML
Information Set (Second Edition)</a></cite>, J. Cowan and R. Tobin,
Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 24 October 2001, revised 4
February 2004. This version of the XML Information Set
Recommendation is
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-infoset-20040204/. The <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset">latest version of XML
Information Set</a> is available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset.</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="XMLNS" id="XMLNS"></a>[XML
Namespaces]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names-20060816/">Namespaces in
XML 1.0 (Second Edition)</a></cite>, T. Bray, D. Hollander, A.
Layman, and R. Tobin, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 14
January 1999, revised 16 August 2006. This version of Namespaces in
XML 1.0 Recommendation is
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names-20060816/. The <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names/">latest version of Namespaces in
XML</a> is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names.</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="XMLSchemaP1" id="XMLSchemaP1"></a>[XML
Schema Structures]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-1-20041028/">XML Schema
Part 1: Structures Second Edition</a></cite>, H. Thompson, D.
Beech, M. Maloney, and N. Mendelsohn, Editors. World Wide Web
Consortium, 2 May 2001, revised 28 October 2004. This version of
the XML Schema Part 1 Recommendation is
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-1-20041028. The <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/">latest version of XML Schema
Part 1</a> is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1.</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="XMLSchemaP2" id="XMLSchemaP2"></a>[XML
Schema Datatypes]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028/">XML Schema
Part 2: Datatypes Second Edition</a></cite>, P. Byron and A.
Malhotra, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 2 May 2001, revised
28 October 2004. This version of the XML Schema Part 2
Recommendation is
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028. The <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/">latest version of XML Schema
Part 2</a> is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2.</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="WSDL-PART1" id="WSDL-PART1"></a>[WSDL
2.0 Core]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-20070626">Web Services
Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 1: Core
Language</a></cite>, R. Chinnici, J-J. Moreau, A. Ryman, S.
Weerawarana, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 26 June 2007. This
version of the "Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version
2.0 Part 1: Core Language" Recommendation is available is available
at http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-20070626. The <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20">latest version of "Web Services
Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 1: Core Language"</a>
is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20.</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="WSDL-PART2" id="WSDL-PART2"></a>[WSDL
2.0 Adjuncts]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-adjuncts-20070626">Web
Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 2:
Adjuncts</a></cite>, R. Chinnici, H. Haas, A. Lewis, J-J. Moreau,
D. Orchard, S. Weerawarana, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 26
June 2007. This version of the "Web Services Description Language
(WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 2: Adjuncts" Recommendation is available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-adjuncts-20070626. The
<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-adjuncts">latest version of
"Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 2:
Adjuncts"</a> is available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-adjuncts.</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="WSDL-SOAP11" id="WSDL-SOAP11"></a>[WSDL
2.0 SOAP 1.1 Binding]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-wsdl20-soap11-binding-20070626">Web
Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 SOAP 1.1
Binding</a></cite>, A. Vedamuthu, Editor. World Wide Web
Consortium, 26 June 2007. This version of the "Web Services
Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 SOAP 1.1 Binding" Working
Group Note is available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-wsdl20-soap11-binding-20070626. The
<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-soap11-binding">latest version
of "Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 SOAP 1.1
Binding"</a> is available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-soap11-binding.</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="RDFmap" id="RDFmap"></a>[WSDL 2.0 RDF
Mapping]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-wsdl20-rdf-20070626">Web Services
Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0: RDF Mapping</a></cite>, J.
Kopecký, B. Parsia, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 26 June
2007. This version of the "Web Services Description Language (WSDL)
Version 2.0: RDF Mapping" Working Group Note is available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-wsdl20-rdf-20070626. The <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-rdf">latest version of "Web Services
Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0: RDF Mapping"</a> is
available at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-rdf.</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="webarch" id="webarch"></a>[Web
Architecture]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-webarch-20041215/">Architecture of
the World Wide Web, Volume One</a></cite>, Ian Jacobs, Norman
Walsh, Editors. W3C Recommendation, 15 December, 2004. Available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-webarch-20041215/ .</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="wsarch" id="wsarch"></a>[WS
Architecture]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-webarch-20041215/">Web Services
Architecture</a></cite>, David Booth, et al., Editors. W3C Working
Group Note, 11 February 2004. Available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-ws-arch-20040211/ .</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="WSAGLOSS" id="WSAGLOSS"></a>[WS
Glossary]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-ws-gloss-20040211/">Web Services
Glossary</a></cite>, Hugo Haas, Allen Brown, Editors. W3C Working
Group Note, 11 February 2004. Available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/NOTE-ws-gloss-20040211/ .</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="DESCRIBEMEDIA" id=
"DESCRIBEMEDIA"></a>[Describing Media Content of Binary Data in
XML]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-media-types/">Describing Media Content of
Binary Data in XML</a></cite>, Anish Karmarkar, Ümit Yalçınalp,
Editors. W3C Working Group Note 4 May 2005. Available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-media-types/</dd>
</dl>
</div>
<div class="div2">
<h3><a name="Informative-References" id=
"Informative-References"></a>6.2 Informative References</h3>
<dl>
<dt class="label"><a name="RFC2606" id="RFC2606"></a>[IETF RFC
2606]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2606.txt">Reserved
Top Level DNS Names</a></cite>, D. Eastlake, A. Panitz, Authors.
Network Working Group, Internet Engineering Task Force, June 1999.
Available at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2606.txt.</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="RFC2616" id="RFC2616"></a>[IETF RFC
2616]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt">Hypertext
Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1</a></cite>, R. Fielding, J. Gettys,
J. Mogul, H. Frystyk, L. Masinter, P. Leach, T. Berners-Lee,
Authors. Internet Engineering Task Force, June 1999. Available at
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt.</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="RFC2818" id="RFC2818"></a>[IETF RFC
2818]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2818.txt">HTTP Over
TLS</a></cite>, E. Rescorla, Author. Internet Engineering Task
Force, May 2000. Available at
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2818.txt.</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="SOAP11" id="SOAP11"></a>[SOAP 1.1]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/">Simple Object
Access Protocol (SOAP) 1.1</a></cite>, D. Box, D. Ehnebuske, G.
Kakivaya, A. Layman, N. Mendelsohn, H. Frystyk Nielsen, S. Thatte,
D. Winer, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 8 May 2000. This
version of the Simple Object Access Protocol 1.1 Note is
http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508.</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="SOAP12-PART1" id=
"SOAP12-PART1"></a>[SOAP 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-soap12-part1-20070427/">SOAP Version
1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework (Second Edition)</a></cite>, M.
Gudgin, M. Hadley, N. Mendelsohn, J-J. Moreau, H. Frystyk Nielsen,
Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 24 June 2003, revised 27 April
2007. This version of the "SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1: Messaging
Framework" Recommendation is
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-soap12-part1-20070427/. The <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/">latest version of "SOAP
Version 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework"</a> is available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/.</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="SOAP12-PART2" id=
"SOAP12-PART2"></a>[SOAP 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-soap12-part2-20070427/">SOAP Version
1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts</a></cite>, M. Gudgin, M. Hadley, N.
Mendelsohn, J-J. Moreau, and H. Frystyk Nielsen, Editors. World
Wide Web Consortium, 7 May 2003, revised 27 April 2007. This
version of the "SOAP Version 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts" Recommendation
is http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-soap12-part2-20070427/. The
<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part2/">latest version of
"SOAP Version 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts"</a> is available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part2/.</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="SOAP-MTOM" id="SOAP-MTOM"></a>[SOAP
MTOM]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-soap12-mtom-20050125/">SOAP Message
Transmission Optimization Mechanism</a></cite> , M. Gudgin, N.
Mendelsohn, M. Nottingham, H. Ruellan, Editors. World Wide Web
Consortium, 25 January, 2005. This version of SOAP Message
Transmission Optimization Mechanism is available at <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-soap12-mtom-20050125/">http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-soap12-mtom-20050125/</a>
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-soap12-mtom-20050125/.</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="WSDReqs" id="WSDReqs"></a>[WSD
Requirements]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-ws-desc-reqs-20021028">Web Services
Description Requirements</a></cite>, J. Schlimmer, Editor. World
Wide Web Consortium, 17 October 2002. This version of the Web
Services Description Requirements document is
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-ws-desc-reqs-20021028. The <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-desc-reqs/">latest version of Web Services
Description Requirements</a> is available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-desc-reqs.</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="WS-A" id="WS-A"></a>[WS-Addressing]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-addr-core/">Web Services
Addressing 1.0 - Core</a></cite>, Martin Gudgin, Marc Hadley,
Editor. World Wide Web Consortium, 17 August 2005. This version of
the Web Services Addressing 1.0 - Core document is available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-addr-core/. The <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-addr-core/">latest version of Web Services
Description Requirements</a> is available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-addr-core/.</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="XPTR" id="XPTR"></a>[XPointer
Framework]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xptr-framework-20030325/">XPointer
Framework</a></cite>, Paul Grosso, Eve Maler, Jonathan Marsh,
Norman Walsh, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 25 March 2003.
This version of the XPointer Framework Proposed Recommendation is
http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xptr-framework-20030325/ The <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xptr-framework/">latest version of XPointer
Framework</a> is available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/xptr-framework/.</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="TAG-whenToUseGET" id=
"TAG-whenToUseGET"></a>[W3C TAG Finding: Use of HTTP GET]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/whenToUseGet">URIs, Addressability,
and the use of HTTP GET and POST</a></cite>, Ian Jacobs, Editor.
World Wide Web Consortium, 21 March 2004. Available at
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/whenToUseGet</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="TAG-versioning" id=
"TAG-versioning"></a>[W3C TAG Finding: Extending and Versioning
Languages Part 1]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/versioning">Extending and
Versioning Languages Part 1</a></cite> David Orchard, Editor. World
Wide Web Consortium, 26 March 2006. Available at
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/versioning</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="web-extensible" id=
"web-extensible"></a>[WebArch: Extensible Languages]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-webarch-extlang">Web
Architecture: Extensible Languages</a></cite> , Tim Berners-Lee,
Dan Connolly, Authors. W3C Note 10 Feb 1998. Available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-webarch-extlang</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="xsd-versioning" id=
"xsd-versioning"></a>[XML Schema: Versioning Use-Cases]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/xsd-versioning-use-cases/">XML Schema
Versioning Use Cases</a></cite> , Hoylen Sue. W3C XML Schema
Working Group Draft, 31 January 2006. Available at
http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/xsd-versioning-use-cases/</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="xsd-versioning-guide" id=
"xsd-versioning-guide"></a>[Guide to Versioning XML Languages using
XML Schema 1.1]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-guide2versioning">Guide to
Versioning XML Languages using XML Schema 1.1</a></cite>, David
Orchard. W3C XML Schema Working Group Draft, 28 September 2006.
Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-guide2versioning</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="xsd11" id="xsd11"></a>[XML Schema
1.1]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xmlschema11-1-20060831/">XML Schema
1.1 Part 1: Structures</a></cite>, H. Thompson, C. M.
Sperberg-McQueen, Shudi (Sandy) Gao, N. Mendelsohn, David Beech,
Murray Maloney, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 31 August 2006.
This Working Draft of XML Schema 1.1 Part 1 is
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xmlschema11-1-20060831/. The <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-1/">latest version of XML Schema
1.1 Part 1</a> is available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-1/.</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="sw-vocabulary" id=
"sw-vocabulary"></a>[SW VocabManagementNote]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://esw.w3.org/topic/VocabManagementNote">Vocabulary
Management</a></cite> , Thomas Baker, et al. Semantic Web Best
Practices and Deployment Working Group Note, 8 Feb 2005. Available
at http://esw.w3.org/topic/VocabManagementNote</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="relax-ng" id="relax-ng"></a>[RELAX
NG]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/relax-ng/spec-20011203.html">RELAX
NG Specification</a></cite>, James Clark, MURATA Makoto, Editors.
OASIS Committee Specification, 3 December 2001. Available at
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/relax-ng/spec-20011203.html</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="jaxrpc" id="jaxrpc"></a>[JAX RPC
1.1]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://java.sun.com/xml/downloads/jaxrpc.html">Java(TM) API for
XML-based Remote Procedure Call (JAX-RPC) Specification, version
1.1</a></cite>, Roberto Chinnici,et al. 14 October, 2003. Available
at http://java.sun.com/xml/downloads/jaxrpc.html</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="rest" id="rest"></a>[REST]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/pubs/dissertation/rest_arch_style.htm">
Representational State Transfer (REST)</a></cite>, Roy Thomas
Fielding, Author. 2000. Available at
http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/pubs/dissertation/top.htm</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="rdf" id="rdf"></a>[RDF]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/">Resource
Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract
Syntax</a></cite>, Graham Klyne, Jeremy J. Carroll, Editors. W3C
Recommendation, 10 February 2004. Available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="owl" id="owl"></a>[OWL]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/">OWL Web Ontology
Language Reference</a></cite>, Mike Dean,Guus Schreiber, Editors.
W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004 . Available at
http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/</dd>
<dt class="label"><a name="altschemalangs" id=
"altschemalangs"></a>[Alternative Schema Languages Support]</dt>
<dd><cite><a href=
"http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/altschemalangs.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8&rev=1.3">
Discussion of Alternative Schema Languages and Type System Support
in WSDL</a></cite>, A. Lewis, B. Parsia, Editors.</dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="back div1">
<h2><a name="acknowledgments" id="acknowledgments"></a>A.
Acknowledgements (Non-Normative)</h2>
<p>This document is the work of the <a href=
"http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/">W3C Web Service Description
Working Group</a>.</p>
<p>Members of the Working Group are (at the time of writing, and by
alphabetical order): Charlton Barreto (Adobe Systems, Inc), Allen
Brookes (Rogue Wave Softwave), Dave Chappell (Sonic Software),
Helen Chen (Agfa-Gevaert N. V.), Roberto Chinnici (Sun
Microsystems), Kendall Clark (University of Maryland), Glen Daniels
(Sonic Software), Paul Downey (British Telecommunications), Youenn
Fablet (Canon), Ram Jeyaraman (Microsoft), Tom Jordahl (Adobe
Systems), Anish Karmarkar (Oracle Corporation), Jacek Kopecky (DERI
Innsbruck at the Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, Austria),
Amelia Lewis (TIBCO Software, Inc.), Philippe Le Hegaret (W3C),
Michael Liddy (Education.au Ltd.), Kevin Canyang Liu (SAP AG),
Jonathan Marsh (WSO2), Monica Martin (Sun Microsystems), Josephine
Micallef (SAIC - Telcordia Technologies), Jeff Mischkinsky (Oracle
Corporation), Dale Moberg (Cyclone Commerce), Jean-Jacques Moreau
(Canon), David Orchard (BEA Systems, Inc.), Gilbert Pilz (BEA
Systems, Inc.), Tony Rogers (Computer Associates), Arthur Ryman
(IBM), Adi Sakala (IONA Technologies), Michael Shepherd (Xerox),
Asir Vedamuthu (Microsoft Corporation), Sanjiva Weerawarana (WSO2),
Ümit Yalçınalp (SAP AG), Peter Zehler (Xerox).</p>
<p>Previous members were: Eran Chinthaka (WSO2), Mark Nottingham
(BEA Systems, Inc.), Hugo Haas (W3C), Vivek Pandey (Sun
Microsystems), Bijan Parsia (University of Maryland), Lily Liu
(webMethods, Inc.), Don Wright (Lexmark), Joyce Yang (Oracle
Corporation), Daniel Schutzer (Citigroup), Dave Solo (Citigroup),
Stefano Pogliani (Sun Microsystems), William Stumbo (Xerox),
Stephen White (SeeBeyond), Barbara Zengler (DaimlerChrysler
Research and Technology), Tim Finin (University of Maryland),
Laurent De Teneuille (L'Echangeur), Johan Pauhlsson (L'Echangeur),
Mark Jones (AT&T), Steve Lind (AT&T), Sandra Swearingen
(U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Air Force), Philippe Le Hégaret
(W3C), Jim Hendler (University of Maryland), Dietmar Gaertner
(Software AG), Michael Champion (Software AG), Don Mullen (TIBCO
Software, Inc.), Steve Graham (Global Grid Forum), Steve Tuecke
(Global Grid Forum), Michael Mahan (Nokia), Bryan Thompson (Hicks
& Associates), Ingo Melzer (DaimlerChrysler Research and
Technology), Sandeep Kumar (Cisco Systems), Alan Davies
(SeeBeyond), Jacek Kopecky (Systinet), Mike Ballantyne (Electronic
Data Systems), Mike Davoren (W. W. Grainger), Dan Kulp (IONA
Technologies), Mike McHugh (W. W. Grainger), Michael Mealling
(Verisign), Waqar Sadiq (Electronic Data Systems), Yaron Goland
(BEA Systems, Inc.), Ümit Yalçınalp (Oracle Corporation), Peter
Madziak (Agfa-Gevaert N. V.), Jeffrey Schlimmer (Microsoft
Corporation), Hao He (The Thomson Corporation), Erik Ackerman
(Lexmark), Jerry Thrasher (Lexmark), Prasad Yendluri (webMethods,
Inc.), William Vambenepe (Hewlett-Packard Company), David Booth
(W3C), Sanjiva Weerawarana (IBM), Asir Vedamuthu (webMethods,
Inc.), Igor Sedukhin (Computer Associates), Martin Gudgin
(Microsoft Corporation), Rebecca Bergersen (IONA Technologies), Ugo
Corda (SeeBeyond).</p>
<p>The people who have contributed to <a href=
"http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/">discussions on
www-ws-desc@w3.org</a> are also gratefully acknowledged.</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>