20070226.html
3.36 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xml:lang="en" lang="en">
<head>
<title>Geospatial XG Teleconference -- 30 Oct 2006</title>
<link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET"
href="http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/base.css" />
<link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET"
href="http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/public.css" />
<link type="text/css" rel="STYLESHEET"
href="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/minutes-style.css" />
<meta content="Geospatial XG Teleconference" name="Title" />
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="content-type" />
</head>
<body>
<p><a href="http://www.w3.org/"><img src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_home"
alt="W3C" border="0" height="48" width="72" /></a></p>
<h1><a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/">Geospatial XG</a>
Teleconference</h1>
<h2>26 Feb 2007</h2>
<h2><a name="attendees" id="attendees">Attendees</a></h2>
<div class="intro">
<dl>
<dt>Present</dt>
<dd>Josh_Lieberman, Chris Goad, Andrew Turner</dd>
<dt>Chair</dt>
<dd>Josh Lieberman</dd>
<dt>Scribe</dt>
<dd>Josh Lieberman</dd>
</dl>
</div>
<h2>Contents</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="#agenda">Topics</a>
<ol>
<li><a href="#item01">Neogeo draft and Note status </a></li>
<li><a href="#item02">Spatial Ontology federation </a></li>
<li><a href="#item03">Incubator status and roadmap </a></li>
</ol>
</li>
<li><a href="#ActionSummary">Summary of Action Items</a></li>
</ul>
<hr />
<div class="meeting">
<h3 id="item01">Neogeo <a
href="http://mapbureau.com/neogeo/neogeo.xml">draft</a> and Note status</h3>
<p>Present draft reflects general feature model and use of ENTITY. No present
objections to incorporation in a draft Note. </p>
<h3 id="item02">Spatial Ontology federation</h3>
<p>Issue: "Adopting", "Quoting", "Importing" other geospatial ontologies as a
federation pattern. </p>
<p>Is there a straightforward ontology federation "meta-ontology"? </p>
<h3 id="item03">Incubator status and roadmap</h3>
<p>Alternatives: <ol>
<li>Continue on with spatial ontology and new charter until June</li>
<li>Finish up with neogeo and propose a Geospatial Interest Group (GIG)
soon</li>
</ol>
General opinion is that neither clearly builds interest better. Interest is a
cart-horse see-saw of data and applications. Hard to rush. The popularity of
GeoRSS is somewhat anomalous. We run with it but don't really know why it is.
</p>
<h2><a name="ActionSummary" id="ActionSummary">Summary of Action
Items</a></h2>
<!-- Action Items -->
<strong>ACTION:</strong> <span content="-72.423 42.3453">Raj Singh and Josh
Lieberman</span> to finish work on W3C Note for neogeo. <br />
<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> Everyone add to resource
listings in Spatial Ontology wiki for source materials. <br />
<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> Describe ontology federation
pattern, cite resources of interest such as geonames ontology, look for best
practice in serializing / realizing this. <br />
<br />
<strong>[NEW]</strong> <strong>ACTION:</strong> Bring RDF realization from
here back into georss.org as a means to engage the people there. <br />
<br />
</div>
<p>[End of minutes]<br />
</p>
<hr />
<address>
Minutes formatted with Amaya
</address>
<div class="diagnostics">
<hr />
</div>
</body>
</html>