w3c-process-perception.html 13 KB

Raw Blame History Permalink

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
  <head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
    <style type="text/css" media="all">
    @import "/QA/2006/01/blogstyle.css";
    </style>
    <meta name="keywords" content='blog, process, quality, w3c' />
    <meta name="description" content="W3C Process is often misunderstood. Arnaud Le Hors shared his impressions about it." />
    <meta name="revision" content="$Id: w3c-process-perception.html,v 1.41 2011/12/16 03:02:51 gerald Exp $" />
   <link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml" title="Atom" href="http://www.w3.org/QA/atom.xml" />
   <link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="RSS 1.0" href="http://www.w3.org/QA/news.rss" />
   <title>W3C, Process and Perception - W3C Blog</title>

   <link rel="start" href="http://www.w3.org/QA/" title="Home" />
   <link rel="prev" href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/04/wcag20_cr_april2008.html" title="WCAG 2.0 takes a giant leap forward — Now it's your turn" />
   <link rel="next" href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/05/web-typography.html" title="Web Typography - Your wish list" />

   <!--
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<rdf:Description
    rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/05/w3c-process-perception.html"
    trackback:ping="http://www.w3.org/QA/sununga/mt-tb.cgi/162"
    dc:title="W3C, Process and Perception"
    dc:identifier="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/05/w3c-process-perception.html"
    dc:subject="W3C Life"
    dc:description="W3C Process is often misunderstood. Arnaud Le Hors shared his impressions about it."
    dc:creator="Karl Dubost"
    dc:date="2008-05-01T00:59:06+00:00" />
</rdf:RDF>
-->

    <!-- <script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.w3.org/QA/mt.js"></script>-->

</head>
<body class="layout-one-column">
      <div id="banner">
      <h1 id="title">
	<a href="http://www.w3.org/"><img height="48" alt="W3C" id="logo" src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/WWW/w3c_home_nb" /></a>
W3C Blog
</h1>
    </div>

    <ul class="navbar" id="menu">
        <li><strong><a href="/QA/" title="W3C Blog Home">[ W3C Blog ]</a></strong></li>
        <li><a href="/QA/Library/" title="Documents and Publications on Web and Quality">Documents</a></li>
        <li><a href="/QA/Tools/" accesskey="3" title="Validators and other Tools">Tools</a></li>
        <li><a href="/2007/12/qa-blog-help/index#feedback">Feedback</a></li>
    </ul>
<div id="searchbox">
<form method="get" action="http://www.google.com/custom" enctype="application/x-www-form-urlencoded">
<p id="formbox"><input type="text" size="15" class="textfield" name="q" accesskey="E" maxlength="255" /> <input type="submit" class="submitfield" value="Search" id="goButton" name="sa" accesskey="G" /> <input type="hidden" name="cof" value="T:black;LW:72;ALC:#ff3300;L:http://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_home;LC:#000099;LH:48;BGC:white;AH:left;VLC:#660066;GL:0;AWFID:0b9847e42caf283e;" /><input type="hidden" id="searchW3C" name="sitesearch" checked="checked" value="www.w3.org/QA" /><input type="hidden" name="domains" value="www.w3.org/QA" /></p>
</form>
</div>


    <div id="main"><!-- This DIV encapsulates everything in this page - necessary for the positioning -->

                     <p class="content-nav">
                        <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/04/wcag20_cr_april2008.html">&laquo; WCAG 2.0 takes a giant leap forward — Now it's your turn</a> |
                        <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/">Main</a>
                        | <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/05/web-typography.html">Web Typography - Your wish list &raquo;</a>
                     </p>

                        <h2 class="entry-header">W3C, Process and Perception</h2>
                           <div class="entry-body">
                              <p><cite><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_Goodkind">Terry Goodkind</a></cite> said:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The mice think they are right, but my cat eats them anyways. This is the point, reality is nothing, perception is everything.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>We all live in our own world of perceptions and the world is shaped with these. I have read recently read a blog post by <cite><a href="http://lehors.wordpress.com/">Arnaud Le Hors</a></cite> saying:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Having been primarily involved in W3C both as a staff member and a member company representative I had grown to expect a certain quality level which has led me to be genuinely baffled by the whole OOXML experience. I just didn’t know how superior the W3C process was compared to that of ECMA and ISO/IEC. I just didn’t know those organizations had processes which are so broken that they would allow such a parody of a standards development to take place and such a low quality specification to be eventually endorsed as an international standard.</p>

  <p>There have been discussions within the W3C for a long time as to whether it should seek to become a PAS submitter and adopt a policy to systematically submit its standards to ISO/IEC. I used to think it should. I no longer think so. The W3C process is so superior to that of ECMA and ISO/IEC, it’s these organizations that need to learn from W3C and those who are working for the W3C standard label to be recognized at an international level in its own right have all my support.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Arnaud's words touched me; <a href="http://lehors.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/a-standards-quality-case-study-w3c/">the full article</a> is worth reading. It reminded me of my time working with Web technologies (in Web design agencies and organizations) prior to my W3C hiring. I was very condemning about W3C and its standards development. Then with time, with the accumulation of experiences and understanding, I realized (more than knowing) that the platform which is offered by W3C is a good compromise. </p>

<p>For sure, my words will be taken suspiciously because I'm right now an employee of W3C. Nothing is perfect at W3C. There are still issues, but the organization is flexible enough that it knows <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2007/01/standard_organizations_history">how to evolve when necessary</a>. People have a tendency to forget this. When I have been hired almost 8 years ago, the notion of test suites for a W3C specification to be published was considered as a big burden and not in the scope of W3C Working Groups. One of the reasons, I had been hired at this time was to change this mindset. It has been hard, painful sometimes, but we did it. The "we" include some W3C members, the wonderful participants of the former <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/">QA Working Group</a> and the dedicated work of the W3C QA Team, including <a href="http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/">Dominique Hazaël-Massieux</a>, <a href="http://www.w3.org/People/olivier/">Olivier Théreaux</a> and myself.</p>

<p>It is sometimes hard to understand how W3C is working. I have in the past tried to explain how all pieces fit together on mailing-lists or here on this blog.  I see comments  on mailing lists and blogs which should not be said, harsh words between people. Be careful about your perceptions, assumptions, they lead you sometimes in fights. This is not right.</p>

<p>W3C  is a community platform where people can work on Web technologies with different tools. One of these tools is the W3C Process. Use the tools for working.</p>

                           </div>
                           <div id="more" class="entry-more">


                           </div>
                       <p class="postinfo">Filed by <a href="http://www.w3.org/People/karl/">Karl Dubost</a> on May  1, 2008 12:59 AM in <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/archive/web_spotting/opinions_editorial/">Opinions &amp;amp; Editorial</a>, <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/archive/w3cqa_news/w3c_life/">W3C Life</a><br />
<span class="separator">|</span> <a class="permalink" href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/05/w3c-process-perception.html">Permalink</a>
                                 | <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/05/w3c-process-perception.html#comments">Comments (2)</a>
                                 | <a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/05/w3c-process-perception.html#trackback">TrackBacks (0)</a>
</p>


<h3 class="comments-header" id="comments">Comments</h3>
<div class="comment" id="comment-138313">
<p class="comment-meta" id="c138313">
<span class="comment-meta-author"><strong>shawn </strong></span>
<span class="comment-meta-date"><a href="#c138313">#</a> 2008-05-01</span>
</p>
<div class="comment-bulk">
<p>Here is a very brief introduction to some aspects of the W3C Process: <a href="http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/w3c-process" rel="nofollow">How WAI Develops Accessibility Guidelines through the W3C Process: Milestones and Opportunities to Contribute</a></p>

</div>
</div>


<div class="comment" id="comment-139124">
<p class="comment-meta" id="c139124">
<span class="comment-meta-author"><strong>Stéphane Deschamps </strong></span>
<span class="comment-meta-date"><a href="#c139124">#</a> 2008-05-05</span>
</p>
<div class="comment-bulk">
<blockquote>

<p>Then with time, with the accumulation of experiences and understanding, I realized (more than knowing) that the platform which is offered by W3C is a good compromise.</p>

</blockquote>

<p>My thoughts exactly. I'm not the last to complain about procedures and so on, but at least the W3C's processes try to be rigorous. Which in itself is something you guys should be proud of.</p>

</div>
</div>


  <div class="comments-open" id="comments-open">
<h3 class="comments-open-header">Leave a comment</h3>

<div class="comments-open-moderated">
   <p>
   Note: this blog is intended to foster <strong>polite
   on-topic discussions</strong>. Comments failing these
   requirements and spam will not get published. Please,
   enter your real name and email address. Every
   individual comment is reviewed by the W3C staff.
   This may take some time, thank you for your patience.
   </p>
   <p>
   You can use the following HTML markup (a href, b, i,
   br/, p, strong, em, ul, ol, li, blockquote, pre)
   and/or <a href="http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax">Markdown syntax</a>.</p>
</div>

<div id="comments-open-data">
<form method="post" action="http://www.w3.org/QA/sununga/beach.pl" id="comments-form">
<h4>Your comment</h4>
<div id="comments-open-text">
  <textarea id="comment-text" name="text" rows="20" cols="100"></textarea><br />
<label for="comment-text">Write your comment text here. Remember, keep the discussion on topic and courteous.</label>
</div>

<h4>About you</h4>
<div id="comment-form-name">
  <input type="hidden" name="static" value="1" />
<input type="hidden" name="entry_id" value="172" />
<input type="hidden" name="__lang" value="en" />
<label for="comment-author">Your Name</label>
<input id="comment-author" name="author" size="30" value="" />
</div>
<div id="comment-form-email">
<label for="comment-email">Your Email Address</label>
<input id="comment-email" name="email" size="30" value="" />
</div>

<div id="comments-open-footer">
<input type="submit" accesskey="s" name="post" id="comment-submit" value="Submit" />

</div>
</form>
</div>
</div>


<p id="gentime">This page was last generated on $Date: 2011/12/16 03:02:51 $</p>

      </div><!-- End of "main" DIV. -->

<address>

This blog is written by W3C staff and working group participants,<br />
&nbsp;and maintained by <a href="/People/CMercier/">Coralie Mercier</a>.<br />
Authorized parties may <a href="/QA/new">log in</a> to create a new entry.<br/>
<span id="poweredby">Powered by Movable Type, magpierss and a lot of Web Technology</span>
    </address>


    <p class="copyright">
      <a rel="Copyright" href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Copyright">Copyright</a> &copy; 1994-2011
      <a href="http://www.w3.org/"><acronym title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C</acronym></a>&reg;
      (<a href="http://www.csail.mit.edu/"><acronym title="Massachusetts Institute of Technology">MIT</acronym></a>,
      <a href="http://www.ercim.eu/"><acronym title="European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics">ERCIM</acronym></a>,
      <a href="http://www.keio.ac.jp/">Keio</a>),
      All Rights Reserved.
      W3C <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Legal_Disclaimer">liability</a>,
      <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#W3C_Trademarks">trademark</a>,
      <a rel="Copyright" href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-documents">document use</a>
      and <a rel="Copyright" href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software">software licensing</a>
      rules apply. Your interactions with this site are in accordance
      with our <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/privacy-statement#Public">public</a> and
      <a href="http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/privacy-statement#Members">Member</a> privacy
      statements.
    </p>

  </body>
</html>